beswetherick Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 Big if... but if we did bring him back and the season got voided it’d probably be the best transfer ever. £4m for a season long loan for a season that doesn’t count. Personally I’d have him back every day of the week. He was the best manager we’ve had in years and exactly the kind of person we need to carry out the huge rebuilding job when the football starts back up again. Yeah we’d all have to swallow our pride a bit but you can guarantee we wouldn’t be getting beat 5-0 by Blackburn at home under Bruce Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retired Owls Fan Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 One of my rules in life. Never get with an ex. You think she'd have learnt a few tricks and gained a bit more experience. The reality is, they're a bit heavier, looser and you don't touch the sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulldog Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 (edited) We were 16th when he arrived and at the end of the season finished 12th. 18 games, 7 wins He then left as soon as a premier club came knocking. I take it the op is asking a rhetorical question? Edited April 16, 2020 by Bulldog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
room0035 Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 30 minutes ago, Bulldog said: We were 16th when he arrived and at the end of the season finished 12th. 18 games, 7 wins He then left as soon as a premier club came knocking. I take it the op is asking a rhetorical question? You can look at it many different ways under Bruce we invested in the future players like Iorfa, Harris, Borner signed for nothing and a good loan in Murphy (eventually) and we don't know about Bates as GM has never given him a chance. Iorfa and Borner with their partnership at the beginning of the season was one of the reason before GM start messing with the formation and personnel why we were in 3rd at Xmas. Neither would have been at the club if SB had not been here. Since Bruce Left GM brought in Da Cruz, Wickham, Windass and some kid from the Italian 3rd division. None of the loan signings have been regulars other than a goal or two from Windass have added very little to the team. I would say on the team side we played better under Bruce and we were going into this season thinking a few tweaks and we could push the play offs. Under GM I cannot wait for the season to finish and hope we don't get dragged into a relegation dog fight and fear for the summer when he has to rebuild the team when players the likes of Da Cruz he has been tracking for his type of players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiggy Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 3 hours ago, NorthernOwl said: Not something we have to worry about with Monk as no chance anyone else would want him. If you have a good manager then they are in demand, it's the risk you run. Totally agree, but I still wouldn’t have him back at considerable cost so he can do it again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harrysgame Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 Pointless really, he will have plenty of offers if and when he goes.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yeadonowl Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 not a cat in hells chance he lied to the fans at Lincoln and couldn't wait to get out of the door fast enough after all DC and fans did for him with regards to the extended leave and he just treated us with total contempt. I only wish he'd been sacked by Xmas at Newcaslte Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inspector Lestrade Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 Played for united Walked away from Wednesday No third chances Plus the fact soon as things go bad, then his history with us will be used against him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flying V Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 Problem is, if GM left who would do better than SB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulldog Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 1 hour ago, room0035 said: You can look at it many different ways under Bruce we invested in the future players like Iorfa, Harris, Borner signed for nothing and a good loan in Murphy (eventually) and we don't know about Bates as GM has never given him a chance. Iorfa and Borner with their partnership at the beginning of the season was one of the reason before GM start messing with the formation and personnel why we were in 3rd at Xmas. Neither would have been at the club if SB had not been here. Since Bruce Left GM brought in Da Cruz, Wickham, Windass and some kid from the Italian 3rd division. None of the loan signings have been regulars other than a goal or two from Windass have added very little to the team. I would say on the team side we played better under Bruce and we were going into this season thinking a few tweaks and we could push the play offs. Under GM I cannot wait for the season to finish and hope we don't get dragged into a relegation dog fight and fear for the summer when he has to rebuild the team when players the likes of Da Cruz he has been tracking for his type of players. I stand by my post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adelphi1867 Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 5 hours ago, lanzaroteowl said: It would take a lot of eating humble pie on his behalf and swallowing a lot of hurt pride on ours. But we would have been top six if he hadn't left. Not according to the Bruce. He said it would take 3-4 transfer windows to clear the decks and bring in the right sort of players to push on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanzaroteowl Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, adelphi1867 said: Not according to the Bruce. He said it would take 3-4 transfer windows to clear the decks and bring in the right sort of players to push on. Well I presume he had the first January as we signed someone, cant recall who. He had the pre season one and he would have had this January. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dewsburyowl58 Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 Don’t like the look of his side kicks so it’s a no from me . He shafted us bigtime Let’s not forget that . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
camffiti Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 Clearly a better manager than Monk, however IF he wanted to come back (I doubt it) and IF DC would have him back (I doubt it) ... As soon as he lost a match, previous bad blood would resurface with the fanbase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LondonOwl313 Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 I'm a big fan of him as a manager and believe that if he'd stayed we'd have made the play offs this season. But I 100% wouldn't have him back here after what happened. It would be too embarrassing all round and would never work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LondonOwl313 Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 26 minutes ago, adelphi1867 said: Not according to the Bruce. He said it would take 3-4 transfer windows to clear the decks and bring in the right sort of players to push on. He was just saying that to lower expectations because he's experienced with the media and managing. He wouldn't have come here initially if he didn't think he'd be able to have a run at being promoted... he wouldn't have wanted to wait 4 transfer windows to be ready for that. I think he'd have been quietly confident he could have got the play offs given we had top 6 form under him last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twolaptops Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 Minimum Wage....no contract terms......bonus if he gets us promoted.........................then sack him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 Don't think DC would take him back. Dont think Bruce would want to come back. A non-starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bannofan Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 Well, if your question is really could we take a manager back , considering the circumstances in which he left, yes I would take him back. 1) Steve Bruce has never shown loyalty in his managerial career. Not sure why any of supporters thought we would be different. 2) He's a decent manager, would probably be the best we could hope for if we went for someone established. He recruited good players in the short time he was here. 3) When he left it was for probably his last shot at a Premier league job , which also happened to be his home town club. It was a perfectly understandable resignation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beswetherick Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 To be fair with the payoff he’s gonna get from the Saudis, he’ll probably buy himself a solid gold trumpet and join the Barmy Army full time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now