Jump to content
ANDY

Breaking news. Club statement.

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, BARMYARMY2010 said:

I've defended the club from the get go from all the "spurious" claims by the "owlstalk" posse who claimed with absolute certainty that Chansiri,Meire,Redgate and the club were for wants of a better word "guilty" of their charges,no ifs,no buts,no maybe's,Chansiri was gunna be banned from football by the "authorities",we (swfc) were gunna be hit with an unprecedented points deduction,potentially relegated two divisions,followed by administration (even some claimed that Chansiri had spent all Daddy's money)just because the "owlstalk" posse said so........the misconduct charge has been dismissed against the three individuals,so now all the"owlstalk" posse have is the EFL's  potential FFP Rule break by swfc,which even that is looking spurious,because like you and others have said,swfc made a profit within the three year period................gunna be an interesting one innit .

.




WOW

Firing bullets off all over the place at a totally imaginary 'posse'


Do you realise how ridiculous that just made you look/sound?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, @owlstalk said:




WOW

Firing bullets off all over the place at the imaginary 'posse'


Do you realise how ridiculous that just made you look/sound?

Right back at ya with the wow,selective reading or what.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, @owlstalk said:



Am I misunderstanding it?

 

lol

 

There are posters on here that have been posting shyte about Chansiri and what they hoped/knew would happen in regards to a "punishment" since the charges were first brought,same peeps time after time,the "posse" as i called em,you telling me you haven't seen/read those posts ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BARMYARMY2010 said:

There are posters on here that have been posting shyte about Chansiri and what they hoped/knew would happen in regards to a "punishment" since the charges were first brought,same peeps time after time,the "posse" as i called em,you telling me you haven't seen/read those posts ?

 


Ah right

 

I was right then - you're firing off bullets at this imaginary 'posse'


Same lazy kind of labelling as those who come on Owlstalk and call people 'people on here' or 'you lot' or 'all those on here'

 

That's like saying 'all those on Twitter' or 'all them on Facebook' or 'all that lot in Meadowhall'


Sad times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, @owlstalk said:

 


Ah right

 

I was right then - you're firing off bullets at this imaginary 'posse'


Same lazy kind of labelling as those who come on Owlstalk and call people 'people on here' or 'you lot' or 'all those on here'


Sad times.

There's nothing imaginary about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BARMYARMY2010 said:

There's nothing imaginary about it.

 

lol


Ooooookkkkkaaayyyyyyy then

 

You're basically acting like the old blokes that walk round town shouting at buildings at buildings mate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:

 

lol


Ooooookkkkkaaayyyyyyy then

 

You're basically acting like the old blokes that walk round town shouting at buildings at buildings mate

Right,so there weren't posts about "fraudulent" accountancy,there weren't posts about unprecedented points deductions,there weren't posts about Chansiri being banned from football,there weren't posts about Meire,Bruce leaving because they knew what was coming from pretty much the same peeps,imagined the lot of it i did...................Behave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, BARMYARMY2010 said:

Right,so there weren't posts about "fraudulent" accountancy,there weren't posts about unprecedented points deductions,there weren't posts about Chansiri being banned from football,there weren't posts about Meire,Bruce leaving because they knew what was coming from pretty much the same peeps,imagined the lot of it i did...................Behave.

 

 

If you mean was it discussed, debated and talked about then yes of course it was mate


That's what a football forum is for, what it does, and what happens on them

As for there being a 'posse' - give over... you sound ridiculous.


Not sure what you're trying to get at.

 


What do you think we should be allowed to discuss in your opinion?

Or is it just opinions you don't agree with that you want banned?
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I'd like to know if Tonto, get's a mention I mean he is a baddy int he. (opened a can of beans here ant i).

Edited by daleblue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, @owlstalk said:

 

 

If you mean was it discussed, debated and talked about then yes of course it was mate


That's what a football forum is for, what it does, and what happens on them

As for there being a 'posse' - give over... you sound ridiculous.


Not sure what you're trying to get at.

How come threads were closed/removed if it was only discussion/debate/talk,no litigious accusations,by as it happens the very same people you think i "imagined" ?

Me being ridiculous on here,fit right in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BARMYARMY2010 said:

How come threads were closed/removed if it was only discussion/debate/talk,no litigious accusations,by as it happens the very same people you think i "imagined" ?

Me being ridiculous on here,fit right in.

 

 

So now you're arguing that our moderators removed potentially libellous stuff? Surely that's what they're supposed to do routinely when stuff is spotted (or even better when reported by the community)

As for the 'posse' you've made up in your head....

You're sounding like a conspiracy theorist mate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, @owlstalk said:

 

 

So now you're arguing that our moderators removed potentially libellous stuff? Surely that's what they're supposed to do routinely when stuff is spotted (or even better when reported by the community)

As for the 'posse' you've made up in your head....

You're sounding like a conspiracy theorist mate

Not at all,i'm saying the very fact that stuff of a litigious nature was removed because of a few samey,samey peeps kind of backs up what i'm saying,the "posse" can't discuss/debate,that's no conspiracy theory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where's Randolph Scott, when you need him.

423786753_giphy(7).gif.570c4aca42690e12df14ffebd75ab12b.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BARMYARMY2010 said:

Not at all,i'm saying the very fact that stuff of a litigious nature was removed because of a few samey,samey peeps kind of backs up what i'm saying,the "posse" can't discuss/debate,that's no conspiracy theory.

 

 

Who's in this 'posse'?

Which members have you seen in this posse?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:

 

 

So now you're arguing that our moderators removed potentially libellous stuff? Surely that's what they're supposed to do routinely when stuff is spotted (or even better when reported by the community)

As for the 'posse' you've made up in your head....

You're sounding like a conspiracy theorist mate


you remove stuff you don’t agree with wether it’s libellous or not ,  where’s that thread gone you was claiming everyone should believe Chris Waddles crap views in that article he put out ?  Fairly sure you removed posts in that thread 

Edited by Royal_D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:

 

 

Who's in this 'posse'?

Which members have you seen in this posse?

Your're the guvnor of this place,find em and read em.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BARMYARMY2010 said:

Your're the guvnor of this place,find em and read em.

 

 

So they don't exist then


Thought not

 

(wasn't expecting you to suddenly conjur up this imaginary posse in real life given it/they don't exist)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, @owlstalk said:

 

 

So they don't exist then


Thought not

 

(wasn't expecting you to suddenly conjur up this imaginary posse in real life given it/they don't exist)

Aye,made it all up i did,just for the craic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BARMYARMY2010 said:

Aye,made it all up i did,just for the craic.

 

I've asked you who this posse is


If it existed you'd be able to show/tell us


Simples

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...