Jump to content
@owlstalk

Interesting read in todays Yorkshire Post

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, torres said:

 

It wasn't me that said it, i just agreed.

 

No need for a heart attack 

 


 

Why would you agree to such a self serving post though?

 

its a nonsense

 

Those sitting online all day criticising every media outlet should have their internet taken off em

 

lol

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:


 

Why would you agree to such a self serving post though?

 

its a nonsense

 

Those sitting online all day criticising every media outlet should have their internet taken off em

 

lol

 

 

As the briefest of brief oversights it is passable as an article  - just!

 

It fills space set out to discuss Wednesday, so job done as far as the paper in question is concerned

 

It would be the equivalent of us writing Man City will need a defender next season or Arsenal have to improve in the transfer market  - its just basic stuff.

 

If people are unaware then i apologise. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, torres said:

 

As the briefest of brief oversights it is passable as an article  - just!

 

It fills space set out to discuss Wednesday, so job done as far as the paper in question is concerned

 

It would be the equivalent of us writing Man City will need a defender next season or Arsenal have to improve in the transfer market  - its just basic stuff.

 

If people are unaware then i apologise. 


 

apology accepted

 

glad you’ve finally seen the light

 

now don’t do it again

 

lol

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, @owlstalk said:


 

apology accepted

 

glad you’ve finally seen the light

 

now don’t do it again

 

lol

 

 

When you pop out of Alan Biggs' bottom you might see some light too 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, torres said:

 

When you pop out of Alan Biggs' bottom you might see some light too 


 

How bad must you feel knowing he posts more insightful things online than you do then?

 

lol

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, torres said:

 

What did you learn from the article that you didn't know?

 

Apart from we conceded 4 in the first half against Brentford, when we all thought it was 3?

What an odd comment. 

 

It's a perfectly reasonable depth of coverage for a daily paper. If you're a committed Wednesday fan the answer will be you didn't learn very much.

 

But most people will have only the haziest idea of what the position at Hillsborough is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, thewookieisdown said:

What an odd comment. 

 

It's a perfectly reasonable depth of coverage for a daily paper. If you're a committed Wednesday fan the answer will be you didn't learn very much.

 

But most people will have only the haziest idea of what the position at Hillsborough is. 


 

This.

 

But some find it necessary to feed their own egos by posting that they already know everything 

 

It’s a social media phenomena and no mistake 

 

Before the internet we never had blokes running between groups of people shouting “I ALREADY KNOW THAT”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, thewookieisdown said:

What an odd comment. 

 

It's a perfectly reasonable depth of coverage for a daily paper. If you're a committed Wednesday fan the answer will be you didn't learn very much.

 

But most people will have only the haziest idea of what the position at Hillsborough is. 

 

And after reading it will still have the haziest idea 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:


 

How bad must you feel knowing he posts more insightful things online than you do then?

 

lol

 

 

The day Biggs writes something insightful is the day Joey Pelupessy wins the Ballon D'or  

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Castleford Owl said:

For me, if Monk stays now then he has to oversee the rebuild. If we want someone else to do it, then they have to be brought in ASAP. There are other players aside from the out of contract ones that need to be moved on (in my opinion); bringing somebody else in at the end of the season means they have to re-assess the squad themselves and waste more time. It's a tough situation.

 

for me Monk HAS to stay and oversee the rebuild, he'll have seen enough to finally decide who needs to be moved on in the summer

 

my worry is someone new comes in, results improve and contracts are dished out when they shouldn't be, this viscous circle will then just continue.

 

I'm thinking back to Bruce giving new contracts to Lee, Westwood and Palmer, I'd have released all of them.

 

this season I want them all released a part from Fletcher (on a sensible contract so would mean wage cut) and Fox as he's a good squad player, but if I'm honest if both leave I wouldn't lose much sleep.

 

The rest HAVE To go, also Rhodes, Westwood and Lees we should look to move on as soon as the season ends.


I'd also be listening to sensible offers for Bannan and Reach, as long as we re-invest back into the 1st team with young, hungry players

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think Monk will last his usual year 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, @owlstalk said:

YorkshirePost.jpg



Thanks to War Of The Monster Trucks for the heads up on this article in todays Yorkshire Post

Make sure you pick up a copy today

No thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YorkshirePost.jpg

 

For those wondering what the rest of the headline is. It's...

 

Tigers chief McCann has had the rug pulled from underwear

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, torres said:

Must have taken the best part of 15 minutes to write that brilliant insight 

 

4 hours ago, @owlstalk said:



*someone posts media clip*

*Immediately the content is ignored and the publication/journalist attacked instead*

EVERY

SINGLE

TIME

 

4 hours ago, McRightSide said:

 

It's a comment on content, not the writer.

 

4 hours ago, @owlstalk said:



You missed my point

I'm not talking about THIS article

I'm talking about ANY article that's posted on here and the immediate need for fans to jump on it rather than discuss the content of it

And then when you bring it up (as I have done above) you immediately get the critic of the journalist coming back at you saying 'yeah but...' about that particular article


 


Just in case anyone wants a summary of the content.

 

Essentially its

 

NOT

 

EVERY

 

SINGLE

 

TIME

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The last three short paragraphs suggests he thinks Monk is getting the bullet if we have another disastrous result. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...