Jump to content
@owlstalk

Today’s starting lineup

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, GerOwl said:

 

Without playing matches.

 

Maybe worded it wrong, should have left it at fit rather than match fit.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Lord Snooty said:

Dawson

Urhoghide     Iorfa    Borner    Palmer

Forestieri     Lee   Pelupessy   Harris

Nuhiu    Da  Druz

 

Another new player in?

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Birley Owl 1867 said:

Play better then.


what like nuhiu lol he’s been particularly impressive this season hasnt he. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Birley Owl 1867 said:

Bannan deservedly dropped. Took long enough.

 

Wickham didnt look like a footballer Wednesday night.

 

Lees was awful too.

 

Yet people still moan 

 

Monk cant win


Not against the bottom three he can’t 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, McRightSide said:


Not against the bottom three he can’t 

You'll see soon enough why your mate has been dropped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, McRightSide said:

Jos-tastic 

 

He’s given up.

 

So no doubt you would have a wildly different line-up? Under the current circumstances of injuries and form, that back 5 almost picks itself for a start. The only places where Monk has a number of options are up front and out wide, and it's not like we have people spectacularly out-performing anyone else there either whereby the selections are obvious.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, camffiti said:

Bannan & Lees - The 2 remaining starters (Westwood & Hutch have already been bombed out) from our decent play off season, have been dropped

 

Surely this is what the Stingers wanted? post-445-0-03457500-1407231008.png

Didn't Lee and FF play at Wembley plus Dave on the bench?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:

D40F0702-4D8A-4C6A-94D2-1F7BBCFA5E6E.jpeg

 

WTF:

 

3-0 Reading 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, DJMortimer said:

We've reached that point with some supporters where everything the manager does has to be ridiculed, belittled and lambasted.

 

There's nothing especially revolutionary about that line-up. Bannan, Lees and Wickham all took a good deal of criticism during the week and the manager has dropped them for players in the same position. Had he not done so, no doubt he would have been slagged off for that instead. 

 

Whether the squad are on Monk's side or care about the club and it's supporters are different matters.

 

You've been on Owlstalk long enough to know how it works: everything must be reduced to a binary decision. You either rate a player or you don't. A manager is either in or out - there's no room for shades of grey here.

 

Some have decided that Monk's bad, therefore everything Monk ever does is bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Birley Owl 1867 said:

Monk cant win

 Exactly...

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2roland2 said:


I actually agree with his back 4 I think it should have been same at Luton tbf. No grumbles from me on that. I’m just fed up knowing no matter who plays we will waste another 90 mins knocking stupid long balls for it to come back for the entire game. 


My post isn't aimed necessarily at who he's picked, more that he chops & changes the back line every week. One of the keys to not conceding is a settled back line.  

 

For what it's worth I'd have gone with Odubajo rather than the young lad. If we concede early the atmosphere could get toxic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, upperwinngardensowl said:

Pelu bleeding pessy!!

Any manager that picks him deserves all he gets. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, onlyonedavidhirst said:

 

And you think Pelupessy can be better than a spectator? Plus change Bannans role, do something to stop him being a spectator, anything rather than play Pelupessy in preference

 

 

You can't change his role. Bannan is a law unto himself. That's the point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Birley Owl 1867 said:

You'll see soon enough why your mate has been dropped.


Winning one game Without Bannan is not the same as winning over a hundred with him...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, areNOTwhatTHEYseem said:

 

You've been on Owlstalk long enough to know how it works: everything must be reduced to a binary decision. You either rate a player or you don't. A manager is either in or out - there's no room for shades of grey here.

 

Some have decided that Monk's bad, therefore everything Monk ever does is bad.

 

I'm fascinated by human psychology. I've seen this pattern repeat itself so many times, and not just at this club. Personally, I don't like the idea that my attitudes and opinions might be so easily subject to such predictable and simplistic principles, but maybe that's just me? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Grez Bez

Always gutted to see Pelupessy & Nuhiu start

 

Would have preferred Hunt and Wickham.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG  

he has lost it 

another boring afternoon ending in defeat a draw at best in my opinion 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Terryowl said:

Well what more can be said, clearly last throw of the dice for Monk.

Monk  OUT.

 

Monk is going nowhere, get used to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...