Jump to content

Player Ratings v Luton


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, S72 Owl said:

Dawson 5 - nothing he could do about the goal 

Palmer 4 - not really in the game. Not a wing back

Lees 4 - much improved performance from Barnsley. Our best defender 

Iorfa 3 - looked out of place in the middle of the back 3. Surely him and lees should swap

Borner 3 - Poor again

FF 6 - Not a wing back but looked like our biggest threat first half and worked hard

Bannan 4 - overun, outbattled, in midfield on his own against 3 again

Lee 5 - neat and tidy and worked hard but can no longer play in a 2 

Windas 4 - didn’t do enough 

De Cruz 5 - worked hard, few good touches, no support

Wickham 3 - awful again, lazy again

 

 

On the wind up surely lol

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, McRightSide said:

Dawson - 4 tug

Palmer - 5 slightly above tug

Lees - 3 super tug

Iorfa - 2 really super tug

Börner - 3 super tug

Lee - 6 passable

Bannan - 4 tug

Windass - 3 super tug

Da Cruz - 3 super tug

FF - 6 MOTM

Wickham - 2 super tug 

 

Monk - 1 the biggest pile of tug of them all. Desperate selection tonight, didn’t work.

 

Just throwing players on the pitch with no plan or thought.

 

WTF was Iorfa doing playing inside Lees and Börner?


Hutchinson and Westwood or relegation. Your choice Gaz.


Night all XOXO

 

Depressingly accurate.

Forestieri at left wing back though, imagine telling him that's what you've got planned for him. Iorfa played like someone told him we were reverting to 3 centre-backs about 5 minutes before kick-off, might give Da Cruz a mark or 2 higher for effort.

 

Imagine having a striker that looks less mobile than Nuhiu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to summarise that performance absolutely shocking.

 

The three centrebacks looked they thought the football was a wasp nest.

 

Hoof ball to Wickham who didn't win a ball all night but then again what  do you expect when that's not his game.

 

Bannan totally overrun in central midfield.

 

MoM FF   For 45 minutes of endeavour playing in a position that he didn't have a clue how to play.

 

If this performance was a one off it could be forgiven as a bad day at the office but the last 7 league performances have been rotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our MOM was Forestieri…………………...a no. 10 / wide striker who was asked to play LEFT WING BACK ,and was hooked at half time !!!!!!!!!

Just let that sink in.

 

I have been pushing for 3-5-2 but by Christ I thought  we would work on it first and then pick people in proper positions.....I just cant back Monk one iota after tonight, his positional selections were laughable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dawson - 4

 

Palmer - 2

Lees - 0

Iorfa - 0

Borner - 0

FF - 5 least bad with harris and thats a forward who only has a right foot playing lwb, the by far worse time to try 352 when reach and fox injured! Delusional.

 

Bannan - 2

Windass - 2 cant run, so much for letting him get his own players in

Lee - 3

 

Cruz - 2 so much for letting him get his own players in

Wickham - 2 ditto, rhodes mk2 so far

 

Harris - 5 a rarity, got some crosses in

 

Ff lwb then subbed when least bad

Not going to 433 at ht

 

Possibly worse team selection and tactics ive ever seen, since eustace had hirsty on bench in the 80's anyway whilst losing every game.

 

Utterly clueless, no wonder hes never achieved anything and stays in a job 2 minutes, dressing room gone, its that bad id even get warnock in.

 

Awful run and he clearly has no answers, matter of time now, never thought those players could ever be made to look lg 2 whilst playing a lg 1 side.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dawson 6 - Poor kicking.  Good hands.  Bit flappy. 
 

Lees 2 - Playing poorly, can’t head or pass. 

Iorfa 2 - Lost Bambi on Ice. 

Borner 4 - Slow but battled and came forward. 
 

Lee 3 - Not himself.  He’s done.  Offers little. 
Bannan 3 - Pressed out of the game as usual. 
 

FF 5 - Tried to be positive.  Failed to deliver. 
Windass 5 - Got in behind but lost ball lots. 
Palmer 3 - Poor tracking.  Slows things up front. 
 

Da Cruz 5 - Huffs and puffs.  Delivers nothing. 
Wickham 4 - Not strong enough.  
 

Subs

Harris 7 - Bright and looked a threat. 
Nuhiu 4 - Won headers to no one. 
Murphy 6 - Looked ok.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Kagoshimaowl

Dawson 4 he’s pants. Their second goal should have stood as he just totally misjudged it

Palmer 5 passable

Lees 2 I don’t want him to play ever again. He’s a total shambles now.

Iorfa 4 get the right studs you muppet. Awful back pass for goal

Borner 3 he’s bobbar! Slower than an elephant 

Forestieri 4 at left wing back?   Eh?

Lee 5 pants but battled

Bannan 4 diabolical. That tackle near the end was pathetic 

Windass 4 non existent after a few good runs early on

Da Cruz 4 very skillful but never looks likely to hurt a team

Wickham 2 is this really our Connor? Not Nuhiu in disguise?

 

Harris 6 looked lively and with a point to prove

Nuhiu 2 shocking finish at the end

Murphy 3

 

Monk -1 get this idiot out of my club before it’s too late. Forestieri at Lwb? Lees in a 3 when Hutch is perfect for that role and he’s at home. Dawson still in even though confidence is shot. Windass our of position.  The list goes on. A masterclass in uselessness!

MONK OUT!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dawson 5. A few decent saves kept score down but looks short of confidence. Can’t see why second goal for them wasn’t given.

Palmer 5. Our best defender on the night.

Borner 3. Played like a pub player. Gave the ball away so many times, made runs that were pointless. Think he was some weird sweeper , a disaster tactically

Iorfa 2. Will never play that badly again. Horrendous.

Lees 3. Marginally better than Iorfa and Borner but looks way, way short of form. 
FF 6. Must have been wondering what his team mates were playing at.

Bannan 3. Now completely out of form in all areas. Incredibly poor.

Da Cruz. 3. Looks a long way short at this level. No craft or guile at all, ran down blind alleys, didn’t use the ball well

Windass 3. Has added nothing. Got we miss Luongo.

Lee 5. Not the player he was, but ran and tried.

Wickham 2. Houston, we have a striker problem. Looks a shadow of the player he was. 

Murphy 6. Lively , ran and did ok

harris 6. Same as murph

Nuhiu 6. Ran, battled and did ok .

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mcmigo said:

Dawson 5. A few decent saves kept score down but looks short of confidence. Can’t see why second goal for them wasn’t given.

Palmer 5. Our best defender on the night.

Borner 3. Played like a pub player. Gave the ball away so many times, made runs that were pointless. Think he was some weird sweeper , a disaster tactically

Iorfa 2. Will never play that badly again. Horrendous.

Lees 3. Marginally better than Iorfa and Borner but looks way, way short of form. 
FF 6. Must have been wondering what his team mates were playing at.

Bannan 3. Now completely out of form in all areas. Incredibly poor.

Da Cruz. 3. Looks a long way short at this level. No craft or guile at all, ran down blind alleys, didn’t use the ball well

Windass 3. Has added nothing. Got we miss Luongo.

Lee 5. Not the player he was, but ran and tried.

Wickham 2. Houston, we have a striker problem. Looks a shadow of the player he was. 

Murphy 6. Lively , ran and did ok

harris 6. Same as murph

Nuhiu 6. Ran, battled and did ok .

Just spat my coffee out! :biggrin:

Edited by royalowlisback
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dawson 3 for the saves but abysmal with the ball at his feet

Palmer 3 although could have been a 2

Lees 1 Sorry but way way off and this is the club captain  absolute gash

Iorfa 1 Worst I have seen from him that back pass was awful

Borner 3 at least tried to move us forward but lack of options meant he kept losing it

Nando 5 Not a wingback our best player 1st half should have stuck one on the pillock that put him there
Lee 3 Sorry he's done it's a shame but we need to move on

Bannan 2 got the build of a 12yr old up against Izzy Brown it was a total mis match can't get the image of the aerial battle they had out my head

Windass 3 looked OK for about 15 mins  and fact he's not been playing showed

Da Cruz  4 made a couple of good runs off the ball but ball never came as we would lose it

Wickham 2  ball didn't stick but we never got forward to link with him so not all his fault

 

Harris 4 Looked a threat at times but tended to try doing it all

Dave 1 Garbage he's been Garbage for 7 years says it all that at one time we were a better side with him in

Murphy 3 didn't offer much really ran around a bit

 

MONK - 1,000,000,000 (minus) Nando at left wing-back is actually more bizarre than JOS's 5-5-0 away to Milwall (that nearly worked at least) it was obvious it wasn't working after 5 mins 1-0 flatters us massively couldn't have argued if it had been 3 or 4  nil at half time. I know the options were limited but lees off and oddjob on palmer to left back should have been the first change after about 15 mins

 

Overall pathetic performance don't know why I have renewed my season ticket really starting to wish I hadn't still I have time to cancel it another pathetic performance against Reading on Saturday to look forward too  reckon everyone of them is looking to avoid any physicality  until we play Man City in the cup looking to make sure they are fit for it. I'd play the under 23's if they don't pull there fingers out there Ar53'5 we would do no worse and at least they would try

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...