Jump to content
stabbo

Connor Wickham Signs - OFFICIAL

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, woodys said:

Guessing they were at Sunderland same time?

Reckon so yes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on Wednesday get him signed and in team tomorrow. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 09/01/2020 at 16:52, Sweet Shezza said:

To see if he can regain his fitness and become a real asset? If not, ship him out and spend his wage elsewhere. 

I don’t know how long he’s been out or how long is left on his contract. 

Been fit all season just not featured 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't believe that people on here are happy enough to sign player who had decent stint with us so long ago, and couldn't get bothered to get out on loan and improve himself as a footballer... Don't think we got ourself a bargain here.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We don’t want Conor whickam - just no. 
 

he’d have to play 10 games just to get match fit.

 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, malek said:

Can't believe that people on here are happy enough to sign player who had decent stint with us so long ago, and couldn't get bothered to get out on loan and improve himself as a footballer... Don't think we got ourself a bargain here.

 

Although... he is literally going out on loan so clearly can be bothered.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ka58 said:

We don’t want Conor whickam - just no. 
 

he’d have to play 10 games just to get match fit.

 

Match fit like the game against Norwich he scored in last week?

Edited by casbahowl
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, casbahowl said:

Match fit like the game against Norwich he scored in last week?


Coming off the bench is different to starting games and playing 90 minutes.

 

I’d still be happy to see Wickham back here but given how little football he’s played in the last few years it’d be a gamble

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ka58 said:

We don’t want Conor whickam - just no. 
 

he’d have to play 10 games just to get match fit.

 

So you’d rather just have Nuhiu, Rhodes and Winnall?  Wow, just wow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ka58 said:

We don’t want Conor whickam - just no. 
 

he’d have to play 10 games just to get match fit.

 

 

17 minutes ago, Kagoshimaowl said:

So you’d rather just have Nuhiu, Rhodes and Winnall?  Wow, just wow

I hate the type of post that Kagoshimaowl made. Ka58 doesn’t say that he’d rather just have Nuhiu, Rhodes and Winnall; he says that, in his opinion, we don’t need Wickham - that’s two different things. I would hope that Kagoshimaowl’s post is unintentional because I haven’t seen such a post from him previously. 

Edited by shandypants
  • Agree 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, shandypants said:

 

I hate the type of post that Kagoshimaowl made. Ka58 doesn’t say that he’d rather just have Nuhiu, Rhodes and Winnall; he says that, in his opinion, we don’t need Wickham - that’s two different things. I would hope that Kagoshimaowl’s post is unintentional because I haven’t seen such a post from him previously. 

What I mean is I’d rather take a risk on Wickham who would be great for us if he stays fit than sticking with the 3 useless stooges.

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every single loan signing is a gamble. I’d rather gamble on a proven player like Wickham then spunk a load of cash on a ‘wonder kid’ from Liverpool, city etc and be dictated to if they play or not. 

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, ka58 said:

We don’t want Conor whickam - just no. 
 

he’d have to play 10 games just to get match fit.

 

 

Featured in three matches in a row for Palace between 26th December and 5th January, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 90 minutes, think it's fair to say his fitness is building quite nicely he wouldn't be starting from scratch with us.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Rogers said:

played for us before - tick
Injury prone - tick

big wages - tick

 

The prefect Wednesday signing 

 

 


This ^^^^^
The majority of our fans these days seem to be pre pubescent morons

  • Disagree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, REDAs_biG_piECE said:


This ^^^^^
The majority of our fans these days seem to be pre pubescent morons

The irony of your username is strong.

  • Haha 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Rogers said:

played for us before - tick
Injury prone - tick

big wages - tick

 

The prefect Wednesday signing 

 

 

 

 

Affinity for the club - tick

Still young with plenty to give - tick

Desperate to prove himself and push on - tick

Quality player with premier league pedigree - tick

Available at a discount price if a loan goes well - tick

  • Like 2
  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, uɐıɹɐqɯıɹ⅁ said:

 

 

Affinity for the club - tick

Still young with plenty to give - tick

Desperate to prove himself and push on - tick

Quality player with premier league pedigree - tick

Available at a discount price if a loan goes well - tick


I think this loan signing is a calculated gamble and something we should pursue. I wouldn’t have looked at it if fletcher was fit but we need that type now and Wickham is the perfect fit. I understand that Palace are happy paying the majority of wages as well. 
 

We still need another striker but someone who has that movement and with pace. 

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, is Wickham starting or on the bench today? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, REDAs_biG_piECE said:


This ^^^^^
The majority of our fans these days seem to be pre pubescent morons

Idiot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...