Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I’ll be amazed if Monk states that Nuhiu’s substitution was tactical. Surely, we should have brought Winnall off for Fletcher or Rhodes before Nuhiu?!!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feck that, more importantly, Lee should’ve come on for Hutch as the 2nd sub to get a threat going from midfield and to step up the tempo

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He went down injured which is unusual for him,  suspect that was the main reason.

 

No doubt some will still be blaming the defeat on him though. Even though he was the only player who created a real chance in 90 minutes. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Much more effective than winall 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fletcher clearly was no where near fit and shouldn't have even been in squad,winnall waste of a shirt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, alanharper said:

He went down injured which is unusual for him,  suspect that was the main reason.

 

No doubt some will still be blaming the defeat on him though. Even though he was the only player who created a real chance in 90 minutes. 

I agree. I thought he was arguably our best player in the first half. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, markg said:

Much more effective than winall 

Still accomplished the square root of feck all.

 

Fletch clearly still crocked, the rest of our strikers are flipping abysmal.  That includes Crown Prince Nuhiu.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, shandypants said:

I agree. I thought he was arguably our best player in the first half. 

More than Iorfa or Borner?????

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, alanharper said:

He went down injured which is unusual for him,  suspect that was the main reason.

 

No doubt some will still be blaming the defeat on him though. Even though he was the only player who created a real chance in 90 minutes. 

He only went down when bb bollocked him for not working hard enough. Mardycunt

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, alanharper said:

He went down injured which is unusual for him,  suspect that was the main reason.

 

No doubt some will still be blaming the defeat on him though. Even though he was the only player who created a real chance in 90 minutes. 

 

We had 3 chances in the first half that were better opportunities than the one Hull scored from. The Harris chance as you say was really well created by Nuhiu, Reach completely fluffed his finish from close range and Winnall fired into the Kop, the ball was a bit behind him but a confident striker would have made more of it. Then Rhodes gets played in 2nd half and.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, markg said:

Much more effective than winall 

 

So was I. And I was on row 40. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Winnall more likely to score and a better player. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Andrew_Owl said:

Winnall more likely to score and a better player. 

 

Do we have another player with same name? 

 

Winnall I watched today was poor today along with everyone else. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, bradowl said:

 

Do we have another player with same name? 

 

Winnall I watched today was poor today along with everyone else. 

Today he was yes, everyone was rubbish today. But my point was that Winnall is more of a goal scorer than Nuhiu.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, markg said:

Much more effective than winall 

Winnall-not really an apt name for such a throw striker. Should change his name to Win-f-all.

Edited by airborne_rat_of_s6
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:rolleyes:Yes, keep it short and simple, blame Nuhui, all the numpties rip him to shreds even though it was 0.0 when he went off.:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, shandypants said:

I agree. I thought he was arguably our best player in the first half. 

Thought he was pretty poor like most of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Andrew_Owl said:

...Winnall is more of a goal scorer than Nuhiu.

 

Not for us he isn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end of the day neither Nuihu, Winnall or Rhodes are good enough; they all need to be got rid of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, hirstyboywonder said:

 

We had 3 chances in the first half that were better opportunities than the one Hull scored from. The Harris chance as you say was really well created by Nuhiu, Reach completely fluffed his finish from close range and Winnall fired into the Kop, the ball was a bit behind him but a confident striker would have made more of it. Then Rhodes gets played in 2nd half and.....

Does sweet f a   There I finished it off for you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...