Jump to content
Guest addedtime

Chansiri charged - could be banned from football

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, billyblack said:

Thats your view. Enjoy it.

 

I was merely stating that the EFL have voiced there area of concern. People were saying they were unsure. Lets see what the outcome is.

Just to add this. If the EFL really dont know what they are doing, DC has all his paperwork in order and all the accounting was done correctly as people have alluded to then the club has nothing to worry about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


1 minute ago, OWLERTON GHOST said:

Here Bertie have one of mine ...

The action version .....

 

 

20191013_211915.gif.4e297d4d349f681f09f1d9bf9a301025.gif

 

 

 

I Bloody love Catchphrase I do .......

 

I didn’t realise mine hadn’t worked properly.

 

Thanks for that.

 

BountifulSecretAmericansaddlebred-size_r

 

  • Haha 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, billyblack said:

The statement they issued has told us where there issues lie.

 

Yes - 14/11/19:

 

The EFL has reviewed a large number of documents obtained from the Club as part of this process and concluded there is sufficient evidence to justify issuing charges of Misconduct. The charges are in respect of a number of allegations regarding the process of how and when the stadium was sold and the inclusion of the profits in the 2017/18 accounts.

All charges will be considered by an independent Disciplinary Commission and, if the charges are proven, the Commission can impose any of the sanctions set out in EFL Regulation 92.2.

So the charge is Misconduct to which there is no apparent precedent in this case. The penalties in 92.2, if found guilty are so wide; from 92.2.1 order a party to do or refrain from doing anything, to 92.2.9 recommend expulsion from membership of The League, any talk of points deduction is premature.

Three weeks ago that press release was issued, and nothing has changed. Some hack then realized that appendix 3 Owners & Directors Test is triggered and those Directors (Relevant Persons) at the time of the accounts' period could also be implicated. It was there all along:

(d) in relation to the assessment of their compliance with this Appendix 3 (and/or any similar or equivalent rules of the Premier League and/or Football Association) at any time, they were found to have:

(i) failed to provide all relevant information (including, without limitation, information relating to any other individual who would qualify as a Relevant Person but has not been disclosed, including where they are acting as a proxy, agent or nominee for another Person); or

(ii) provided false, misleading or inaccurate information,

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, sonofbert2 said:

 

I didn’t realise mine hadn’t worked properly.

 

Thanks for that.

 

BountifulSecretAmericansaddlebred-size_r

 

I've got a speed controller app that can adjust rate of thrust on that gif from bump n grind to rabbit injection ..lol

(One for the Mk1 GTI owners there)

  • Haha 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Animis said:

 

Yes - 14/11/19:

 

The EFL has reviewed a large number of documents obtained from the Club as part of this process and concluded there is sufficient evidence to justify issuing charges of Misconduct. The charges are in respect of a number of allegations regarding the process of how and when the stadium was sold and the inclusion of the profits in the 2017/18 accounts.

All charges will be considered by an independent Disciplinary Commission and, if the charges are proven, the Commission can impose any of the sanctions set out in EFL Regulation 92.2.

So the charge is Misconduct to which there is no apparent precedent in this case. The penalties in 92.2, if found guilty are so wide; from 92.2.1 order a party to do or refrain from doing anything, to 92.2.9 recommend expulsion from membership of The League, any talk of points deduction is premature.

Three weeks ago that press release was issued, and nothing has changed. Some hack then realized that appendix 3 Owners & Directors Test is triggered and those Directors (Relevant Persons) at the time of the accounts' period could also be implicated. It was there all along:

(d) in relation to the assessment of their compliance with this Appendix 3 (and/or any similar or equivalent rules of the Premier League and/or Football Association) at any time, they were found to have:

(i) failed to provide all relevant information (including, without limitation, information relating to any other individual who would qualify as a Relevant Person but has not been disclosed, including where they are acting as a proxy, agent or nominee for another Person); or

(ii) provided false, misleading or inaccurate information,

 

 

Thanks, i had read that but others obviously hadnt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mycroft said:

 

At no point was anyone on the edge of their seat under Stu stewardship, nice bloke that he was and he did indeed sign some decent players but his tactics and the football he conjured was terrible.  

 

Having said that he would have made a very decent trainer and was disappointed that he didn't stick around.

 

Edge of your seat lol 

Depends If your only interested in spangly flicks and tricks bud. 

I loved all the westty wonder saves last gasp tackles and everyone battling as a team and throwing bodies on the line. 

It was even more nerve racking if we had grabbed a goal and where defending for our lives. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, shezzas left peg said:

Depends If your only interested in spangly flicks and tricks bud. 

I loved all the westty wonder saves last gasp tackles and everyone battling as a team and throwing bodies on the line. 

It was even more nerve racking if we had grabbed a goal and where defending for our lives. 

 

Each to their own but for me watching us play in CC first season was edge of your seat stuff.  The crowd watched the game instead of discussing banal crap with their mates.

 

Christ knows why CC changed his strategy and tactics.  

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, OWLERTON GHOST said:

Thanks for your question 

Shezza ...

I reckon it's just downright shoddy flower arrangement practices..

 

 

Thanks no Promble .....

Serves him right for using red & white roses.... 

You know that's banned lol

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, OWLERTON GHOST said:

Here Bertie have one of mine ...

The action version .....

 

 

20191013_211915.gif.4e297d4d349f681f09f1d9bf9a301025.gif

 

 

 

I Bloody love Catchphrase I do .......

 

Just say what you see 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mycroft said:

 

Each to their own but for me watching us play in CC first season was edge of your seat stuff.  The crowd watched the game instead of discussing banal crap with their mates.

 

Christ knows why CC changed his strategy and tactics.  

As you say each to their own bud. 

As for cc we got lucky over and over with dramatic late winners that papered over the cracks of his system and styles frailties in the first season as we conceded too many first half goals and had to throw the kitchen sink at it second half as my memory serves me. 

I think he realised this and tried to keep us tighter at the back and not concede as many first half goals. 

We still ended up having to have a real go second half though. 

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, billyblack said:

Just to add this. If the EFL really dont know what they are doing, DC has all his paperwork in order and all the accounting was done correctly as people have alluded to then the club has nothing to worry about.

The King of Competence will triumph again. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, sonofbert2 said:

 

Not obvious or unusual according to a few folk who actually know what they’re talking about on here.

 

Folk are always very ready to “take sides” on here when our club is under attack for various stuff and 99% of the time it’s our side.

 

Very strange it’s not the case, and hasn’t been ever, with concerns to anything relating to DC for a group of posters on here.

 

 

 

 

 

I think, had this been an exception - a one off - then there would perhaps be more support for him on here.

 

As it is, we have been sponsored by non-existent companies for a while now and been asked to buy into ridiculous schemes to drag us out of potential FFP punishments. 

 

Much of the support on here has even missed the point - selling the ground, although not palatable, is / was not against the rules. Inflating the value and, even more so, backdating it, very much is. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hookowl said:

 

Or, as has been suggested before on here. The auditors took their time to ensure they were happy with everything before signing the accounts off.

Making sure they'd covered their tracks more like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hookowl said:

 

Or, as has been suggested before on here. The auditors took their time to ensure they were happy with everything before signing the accounts off.


what happens with these auditors that have signed these Potentially illegal books off ??  If the EFL are saying there incorrect will the auditors also be in trouble ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, billyblack said:

Just to add this. If the EFL really dont know what they are doing, DC has all his paperwork in order and all the accounting was done correctly as people have alluded to then the club has nothing to worry about.


For all ANY of us know , this could still be the case 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Royal_D said:


what happens with these auditors that have signed these Potentially illegal books off ??  If the EFL are saying there incorrect will the auditors also be in trouble ?

 

I would have thought it unlikely that the auditors would sign off anything they weren't 100% sure of. Their credibility and that of the firm they work for would be ruined if the EFL proved that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hookowl said:

 

I would have thought it unlikely that the auditors would sign off anything they weren't 100% sure of. Their credibility and that of the firm they work for would be ruined if the EFL proved that.


Good mate of mine said same to me earlier, one of these accountancy firms throwing some legal action in the EFL’s direction might not be a million miles away 

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Royal_D said:


Good mate of mine said same to me earlier, one of these accountancy firms throwing some legal action in the EFL’s direction might not be a million miles away 

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/jul/10/watchdog-finds-work-of-patisserie-valerie-auditor-unacceptable

 

https://www.accountancyage.com/2018/05/16/auditors-in-the-dock-over-carillion-as-report-calls-for-big-four-break-up/

 

Auditors are far from infallible.

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Bigger Guns said:

I’m a chartered accountant and trained in audit.

 

As far as I’m concerned until someone makes Sheffield Wednesday restate their accounts, which the EFL cannot do, there is no case to answer.

 

P&S rules state:

2.3 The Executive shall determine whether consideration included in the Club’s Earnings Before Tax arising from a Related Party Transaction is recorded in the Club’s Annual Accounts at a Fair Market Value. If it is not, the Executive shall restate it to Fair Market Value.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...