Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, 4evaowl said:

He was poor but we gave away so many brainless fouls!

 


This is something we need to change.

Given more fouls away this season than any other team.

We are so naive 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, SallyCinnamon said:

People laugh when I mention an agenda but it’s clear to see. Referees work against us to the best of their ability. I don’t know if they don’t like the club or some of the players give them too much stick. But it’s so obvious.

 

In recent weeks, Sam Hutchinson got booked for being whacked in the ankle by Harry Arter. I mean how can you get that wrong? Arter didn’t get anything for it. 
 

Jacob Murphy fouled in the box, very obvious. Free kick outside the box given. Costs us a point away at Hull.

 

Home to Wigan. Fletcher scores a perfectly valid goal, linesman gives offside. Could have cost us three points.

 

Tonight, well there’s too many to count. The equaliser being the most criminal. Never a foul in the first place and clear obstruction for the goal. Tomlin arguably shouldn’t have even been on the pitch for an intentional elbow on Borner. I’ve seen them given. 
 

Agenda, no two ways about it. It’s not just one off decisions that go against us, this happens every week and has done for a couple of seasons. Its so clear, it’s almost expected now. 

Yep .

 

If it's a fair decision against us like the one where Iorfa pulled the player, I'm like, fair enough.

 

But these are diabolical decisions consistently happening against us.

 

It's happening too regularly. Starting to think there is something I'm it. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Horrific referee but then again aren't they all. Refs should be made to explain these decisions and then explain why they don't understand the most basic rules of football. 

 

Shocker but it's happening every game now, I look forward to watching the referee show when L**ds come to Hillsborough next week.

Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, oldishowl said:


Are you still defending the ref.

They obviously made a joint decision to come to a view he wasn’t interfering.

Told you before the kick off Stroud is a awful ref basically seeing out his time ruining games in this division when in reality he shouldn’t be anywhere near it.

Not in any way am i defending him. I said part way through the game i was wrong and he was rubbish. It was more obvious to the lino what flint was doing and where he was than to the ref giving their respective positions .

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, A12owl said:

Not in any way am i defending him. I said part way through the game i was wrong and he was rubbish. It was more obvious to the lino what flint was doing and where he was than to the ref giving their respective positions .


No it wasn’t.

The referee was the one who could see that Flint was directly in line with both where the ball was and Dawson.

The linesman cannot see that. He could see Flint was in an offside position but so could the rest of the world.

It meant Dawson could not see the ball being kicked due to a player stood in an offside position.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, oldishowl said:


This is something we need to change.

Given more fouls away this season than any other team.

We are so naive 

But we also have one of the best defences. A lot of the fouls we gave away were quite a way out, near the touchline. And generally we're pretty comfortable defending balls being played in from there. We wouldn't be the first team to use it as a tactic to stop the opposition building more dangerous attacks, even if we might have gone overboard with it today.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, cowl said:

Inept. But further exacerbated by the fact he seems to blow for everything but also seems to have a disturbingly annoying manner about him.

 

Little man syndrome 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldishowl said:


No it wasn’t.

The referee was the one who could see that Flint was directly in line with both where the ball was and Dawson.

The linesman cannot see that. He could see Flint was in an offside position but so could the rest of the world.

It meant Dawson could not see the ball being kicked due to a player stood in an offside position.

Stroud is smaller than Bannan so by taking the angles where he was at trying to look over the defenders he wasn't in a good position to see Flint. If the decision is offside or interfering with play that's what would decide which official was responsible. Ref doesn't give offsides.  Lino couldn't see to give interference. 

It should have been disallowed on both counts. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, A12owl said:

Stroud is smaller than Bannan so by taking the angles where he was at trying to look over the defenders he wasn't in a good position to see Flint. If the decision is offside or interfering with play that's what would decide which official was responsible. Ref doesn't give offsides.  Lino couldn't see to give interference. 

It should have been disallowed on both counts. 

 


So you are telling me he couldn’t see man mountain Aden Flint doing star jumps from 15 yard away. He knew exactly where he was.

No wonder he got so much wrong if his eyes are that bad

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Refs are bent

 

Been saying it for years

 

It will never even it’s self out over a season

 

They are corrupt and it’s probably down to betting

 

Theres no other explanation for so many years of terrible officiating at our matches

 

Nobody can be that bad at their chosen profession 

 

They have to be bent

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, horny owl said:

Refs are bent

 

Been saying it for years

 

It will never even it’s self out over a season

 

They are corrupt and it’s probably down to betting

 

Theres no other explanation for so many years of terrible officiating at our matches

 

Nobody can be that bad at their chosen profession 

 

They have to be bent

I used to laugh at this kind of thing  ,but seriously how can you explain how bad the officials have been in our last 2 games  ?. 

When did we last have a  " homer " ?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So that’s 4 absolute shockers we’ve had in the last 5 games now

 

Fulham- completely ignoring 90 minutes of sh*thousery

 

Hull- ignoring a clear penalty 

 

Wigan- Giving offside for a perfectly good goal

 

Cardiff- Missing a 6 foot 7 defender doing starjumps infront of Dawson whilst 5 yards offside. Oh and to rub salt in the wounds the scorer shouldn’t have even been on the pitch, after him intentionally elbowing Borner

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did he put a bet on the game being a draw ? 

Did he get a bung from someone ?

Just asking, because haven’t we seen some ridiculously biased referees over the seasons ?

Stroud was just the same when he was at Hillsborough. 

In the past, haven’t we seen some incidents that everyone in the ground has seen apart from the officials ? 

I’m sure that, one day, a top retired referee will, in his biography, expose the corruption surrounding referees and officials. 

I can’t wait for that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...