Jump to content

Jordan Rhodes


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, slinger208b said:

 

I dont think he was upfront as a striker, but the middle of the supporting three.

 

When there were two up front (winall), he went on the wing...

I didn't see the match, but the commentary said it was a straight swop, Reach for Murphy on the wing, and Winnall took Reach's place upfront. 

Was this not the case, did the BBC get it wrong. Again. 

Edited by daleblue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hawkowl said:

If you post a list of things you would like to discuss please feel free. 

Obviously your list cannot include aything previously talked about such as swfc as this would clearly offend. 

 

FFS. 

Jordan Rhodes doesn't play in latest Sheffield Wednesday match.

New managers' 1st match after 10 days at the club.

Wednesday win 0-2.

But, oh no, Jordan Rhodes didn't play, so let's "discuss" if this is the end for him!! :duntmatter:

 

FFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, daleblue said:

I didn't see the match, but the commentary said it was a straight swop, Reach for Murphy on the wing, and Winnall took Reach's place upfront. 

Was this not the case, did the BBC get it wrong. Again. 

 

Sky line ups depicted it as that and to me fletcher was always leading when we were advancing.

 

Fine line these systems though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, daleblue said:

I didn't see the match, but the commentary said it was a straight swop, Reach for Murphy on the wing, and Winnall took Reach's place upfront. 

Was this not the case, did the BBC get it wrong. Again. 

 

19 minutes ago, slinger208b said:

 

Sky line ups depicted it as that and to me fletcher was always leading when we were advancing.

 

Fine line these systems though...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Buddy Repperton said:

Jordan Rhodes doesn't play in latest Sheffield Wednesday match.

New managers' 1st match after 10 days at the club.

Wednesday win 0-2.

But, oh no, Jordan Rhodes didn't play, so let's "discuss" if this is the end for him!! :duntmatter:

 

FFS.

Should folk ask you for permission to post on anything outside your narrow vision of what can be discussed,,,,,,how long after a game we’ve won can people discuss anything other than the 90 minutes

 

If you don’t think Rhodes omission is worthy of discussion just don’t read the thread......or post if you are interested.....or post saying you aren’t interested if you want to come across as a somewhat confused individual

Edited by Ian
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Kagoshimaowl
15 hours ago, Hawkowl said:

Is that it then?

Will he even make the bench again?

Seems like ahuge waste of a limited budget.

 

 

FFS.

Hope so! Get rid in January 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Hawkowl said:

Is that it then?

Will he even make the bench again?

Seems like ahuge waste of a limited budget.

 

 

FFS.

Wheal & Deal.

IF Norwich still want him come January, for nowt, why not do a swap?.

Rhodes for 1 or 2 of their fringe players, if any are good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have been on the phone to Neil Lennon and Stephen Gerrard in the summer to try and get him up north for a loan spell.  We keep saying he needs service for mega goals - being up top for Celtic or Rangers he would have got hatfuls of chances and we could see whether he is still the volume scorer he once was.  He also might have come back with confidence, and gained his place back in the national team.

 

Current position is lose lose for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, cowl said:

 

It's a stretch to call that first half 4-4-2.

4-4-1-1, maybe or just 4-5-1 (or 4-2-3-1) - but whatever it was it didn't work and Reach in particular was anonymous.

See I thought it would be 4231 but the way we set up was 442, Reach was more advanced than fletch for the most part but as you say anonymous.

 

Hopefully Winnall has given enough reason to say I can play in a 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...