Dot Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, s6 owl said: What about Villa? Villa are not in the EFL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trev Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 (edited) Quick....give the place a quick lick of paint and spray some air freshener in the bogs. Be reet. Edited September 4, 2019 by trev 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonbones Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 9 minutes ago, Royal_D said: And facts are EFL will say it’s worth whatever there tin pot independent firm says it is So, what needs to happen is someone needs to come in with a bid, right now. That bid will be rejected. So lets say "Grandad incorporated" bids £89m and Chansiri's business says, no - i'm sorry I will only accept £385m What you have there is something that would be accepted in a court of law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
striker Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 (edited) fizz the EFL, about time someone sued them and showed them up to be the inadequate organisation they are. Hopefully a triumvirate of those involved will take the EFL to the cleaners if they don't wind their neck in. (Of course I realise the ground purchases were dodgy as fizz, but just because it exposed a flaw, the EFL shouldn't drag this out to try and save face) Edited September 4, 2019 by striker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobness Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 I wouldn't be worried. Aren't there about £55m worth of executive boxes up for grabs each season? Should more than justify the valuation 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 Yeh, I’d imagine if the EFL try and cause problems here the clubs will be taking legal advice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEnchanter Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 6 minutes ago, Costello 77 said: You must be at a low ebb if you can't throw that ridiculous badge that they were trying to float straight back at them.. I have an arsenal of anti Leeds venom don't worry. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEnchanter Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 1 minute ago, Royal_D said: Yeh, I’d imagine if the EFL try and cause problems here the clubs will be taking legal advice Another item on the agenda for our Lawyers then ahead of the Bruce compo, SAGGY issue and the phantom goggle thrower of Stamford Bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vulva Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 Surely the club got the OK from the league to complete such a transaction on the terms completed? Or does such business practice not exist in the wild west world of football in 2019. Seems to me we may have gone down the route of pleading forgiveness, rather than permission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitcat Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 They've already given it the green light haven't they? Can't see how they can backtrack now. Sue the antiquated old crusters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costello 77 Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 Just now, Hitcat said: They've already given it the green light haven't they? Can't see how they can backtrack now. Sue the antiquated old crusters. Best antiquated old crusters in the galaxy.. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 Just now, Hitcat said: They've already given it the green light haven't they? Can't see how they can backtrack now. Sue the antiquated old crusters. Think this is what may happen, EFL probs doing this to keep Gibson quiet Think it may be dodgy legal ground for them to start saying no your ground is only worth X ... nothing in there rules said this couldn’t happen they can’t change the goalposts now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEnchanter Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 Can we just sue everything. Mansfield, the EFL, SAG the SYP, Newcastle, Mike Ashley, OH Leuven, Leicester, George Hirst the heavy handed stewards, Gary Teale, Bentley, Milan Mandaric's phone network provider. Lets have the lot of them. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitcat Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 Just now, TheEnchanter said: Can we just sue everything. Mansfield, the EFL, SAG the SYP, Newcastle, Mike Ashley, OH Leuven, Leicester, George Hirst the heavy handed stewards, Gary Teale, Bentley, Milan Mandaric's phone network provider. Lets have the lot of them. Yes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anus Posted September 4, 2019 Author Share Posted September 4, 2019 6 minutes ago, TINKERBELL said: Sheffield Wednesday's ground sale is under investigation by Steve Gibson. He's reyt not happy and kicked wife and dog out tonight. The wife and dog are taking legal action as we speak against mr Gibson I would quite happily nip to Middlesbrough and 'lose my poo' through his letterbox. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthndav Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, TheEnchanter said: Can we just sue everything. Mansfield, the EFL, SAG the SYP, Newcastle, Mike Ashley, OH Leuven, Leicester, George Hirst the heavy handed stewards, Gary Teale, Bentley, Milan Mandaric's phone network provider. Lets have the lot of them. Channelled Delia there. Good work. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mkowl Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 25 minutes ago, Royal_D said: Was always gonna pop up this, there ever actually been an official figure for what Chansiri pumped in for the ground ? 60m And not "pumped in" the sum is still showing as money owed for the sale by the company that bought it - looked like it was payable over 8 years Interesting stuff that the EFL would seek to dispute a valuation that was presumably professionally prepared and signed off as being "true and fair" by auditors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TodwickOwl Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 Just now, mkowl said: 60m And not "pumped in" the sum is still showing as money owed for the sale by the company that bought it - looked like it was payable over 8 years Interesting stuff that the EFL would seek to dispute a valuation that was presumably professionally prepared and signed off as being "true and fair" by auditors. The EFL are above the law Hence why Forestieri is guilty of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitcat Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 Just now, TodwickOwl said: The EFL are above the law Hence why Forestieri is guilty of course Bloody crusters! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mkowl Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 19 minutes ago, Bukta said: Not when you are selling the asset to yourself. It has to be valued by an accredited third party to satisfy HMRC. And seriously the auditors have to satisfy themselves as to the integrity of any valuation. Entire auditing standard on it. I got a slapped wrist by my reviewer for not adequately assessing the integrity of a Barclays portfolio report a client had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now