Jump to content

Don’t know what issue with bullen is


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, standerino said:

 

‘Although the club have booked a profit within the year, without the sale of Hillsborough it would have lost around £35.5m with VAT and if you add that to the losses from the two previous years, that would have taken the losses to £66m compared to an FFP allowance of £39m.’ - Kieran Maguire (that football finances guy)

 

based on the above, we are going to breach FFP by the end of this season, and it won’t even be close...

 

someone please correct me if I’m wrong! (I hope I am!)

Agree Standarino

Theres plenty of accountants come on here , et's hope one can break it down in Laymans terms so as we can understand what's going on 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ramone said:

Pep Guardiola had his 'audition' with Barcelona. 

Zinedine Zidane had his 'audition' with Real Madrid

 

What truly idiotic statement you've just made 

2 world class internationals with loads of contacts in the game is a little bit different to Bullen taking the reigns 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, standerino said:

 

‘Although the club have booked a profit within the year, without the sale of Hillsborough it would have lost around £35.5m with VAT and if you add that to the losses from the two previous years, that would have taken the losses to £66m compared to an FFP allowance of £39m.’ - Kieran Maguire (that football finances guy)

 

based on the above, we are going to breach FFP by the end of this season, and it won’t even be close...

 

someone please correct me if I’m wrong! (I hope I am!)

I keep bringing this up (without the exact figures) when fans are saying let’s give “whoever” a chance, see how he goes.

 

They are either not aware that we don’t have the luxury of giving someone time, or  choose to ignore the fact.

 

Even an experienced manager doesn’t guarantee we will finish in the playoffs but 9 times out of 10 it gives you a better chance.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Spookone said:

I keep bringing this up (without the exact figures) when fans are saying let’s give “whoever” a chance, see how he goes.

 

They are either not aware that we don’t have the luxury of giving someone time, or  choose to ignore the fact.

 

Even an experienced manager doesn’t guarantee we will finish in the playoffs but 9 times out of 10 it gives you a better chance.

 

Exactly.

 

I was optimistic going into the season wth Bruce, but now I’m fearful of what will happen to us as a club by not going up...

 

Still bought a season ticket mind!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, OxonOwl said:

As we ended up in profit for the last year I think we have to lose less than the figure for the year before to stay under the £39m.

 

Maybe the £39m will be reviewed given the way fees and wages are increasing year on year?

 

It's a simple matter of maximum losses of £39m for a rolling three year period. 

 

So last year we were £2.5m in profit due only to the ethically dubious stadium sale and the year before recorded losses of £20.7m. Therefore, to remain within the P & S limits this season we must lose no more than about £10.8m. But as our 'normal' performance outside of the 'creative accounting' that we cannot repeat next summer saw a deficit of over £30m, I'd say we have got an enormous iceberg looming on the horizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ramone said:

Pep Guardiola had his 'audition' with Barcelona. 

Zinedine Zidane had his 'audition' with Real Madrid

 

What truly idiotic statement you've just made 

You grade-a melt.  Go sit in a corner.  

 

Did you just compare Lee flipping Bullen to Pep Guardiola?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, DJMortimer said:

 

It's a simple matter of maximum losses of £39m for a rolling three year period. 

 

So last year we were £2.5m in profit due only to the ethically dubious stadium sale and the year before recorded losses of £20.7m. Therefore, to remain within the P & S limits this season we must lose no more than about £10.8m. But as our 'normal' performance outside of the 'creative accounting' that we cannot repeat next summer saw a deficit of over £30m, I'd say we have got an enormous iceberg looming on the horizon.

 

Ah crap. That figure of £10.8m should have read £20.8m. Even Bob Grierson is shaking his head at me.

:biggrin:

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, DJMortimer said:

 

It's a simple matter of maximum losses of £39m for a rolling three year period. 

 

So last year we were £2.5m in profit due only to the ethically dubious stadium sale and the year before recorded losses of £20.7m. Therefore, to remain within the P & S limits this season we must lose no more than about £10.8m. But as our 'normal' performance outside of the 'creative accounting' that we cannot repeat next summer saw a deficit of over £30m, I'd say we have got an enormous iceberg looming on the horizon.

Am I missing something shouldn't we be able to lose 20m this year and stay within FFP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Socialist_Owl said:

Yeah, he did.  Why bring them up?  Their situations aren't even in the same stratosphere as Bullen's.

 

If you really read that as him saying that Lee Bullen is as good as Pep Guardiola then there's nothing I can reply with that would help. The suggestion that novice managers can succeed in much more demanding and higher pressure situations than ours is perfectly reasonable in this context.

 

2 minutes ago, pazowl55 said:

Am I missing something shouldn't we be able to lose 20m this year and stay within FFP.

 

I beat you to it. :rolleyes: See the post right above yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inexperienced managerially.

 

And consider this.

 

Chansiri doesn't like sacking the managers he's chosen.

 

If/when Bullen gets on a bad run and can't resolve it, Chansiri would dig his heels in and retain him far too long.

 

It would be like Luhukay revisited, with the club sliding ever further down the league and the fan base getting ever more restless.

 

The other names in the frame may not currently be at their managerial best, but at least with any of them we'd be unlikely to have any relegation worries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Athelwulf said:

Inexperienced managerially.

 

And consider this.

 

Chansiri doesn't like sacking the managers he's chosen.

 

If/when Bullen gets on a bad run and can't resolve it, Chansiri would dig his heels in and retain him far too long.

 

It would be like Luhukay revisited, with the club sliding ever further down the league and the fan base getting ever more restless.

 

The other names in the frame may not currently be at their managerial best, but at least with any of them we'd be unlikely to have any relegation worries.

 

Watching Bullen become more and more stressed with every game if/when we went on a bad run would be horrible for everyone. Fans turning against him and chanting for him to be sacked. He doesn’t deserve that stress. I want him to stay with us for a long time but in a coaching capacity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some very conservative posters on here who seem happy to go with the tried and failed types like monk,Coleman rowett rather than give a newbie  a shot .....no one knows if bullen can cut it or not until he gets go at it ......to not want him because he's been good servant to the club and the fans might turn on him is a ridiculous  reasoning .

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, torryowl said:

Some very conservative posters on here who seem happy to go with the tried and failed types like monk,Coleman rowett rather than give a newbie  a shot .....no one knows if bullen can cut it or not until he gets go at it ......to not want him because he's been good servant to the club and the fans might turn on him is a ridiculous  reasoning .

Whats your obsession with wanting Bullen as manager?.

He was an average player in a poor Owls team and is coaching abilities are average at the very best.

We need someone who can attract good players and get the best out of them.

Bullen isn't that man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, owlsdreamer said:

Whats your obsession with wanting Bullen as manager?.

He was an average player in a poor Owls team and is coaching abilities are average at the very best.

We need someone who can attract good players and get the best out of them.

Bullen isn't that man.

I don't  necessarily  want him as manager I'm just questioning why a lot think he would be crap at it .....he's never done it before so why not take a chance rather than the serial failures that are getting a mention ....  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, pazowl55 said:

Am I missing something shouldn't we be able to lose 20m this year and stay within FFP.

We didn't really spend anything last summer and are still way over the limits. Mainly due to our high wages i think

Edited by modboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...