Jump to content

Ground sale to go through shortly?


Guest Ash76

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mkowl said:

The big question of course is if we finally sell players how much is owed to Doyen out the proceeds 

 

Nothing. 3rd party ownership of players is banned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, S36 OWL said:

Tricky one for the club. Do they hold out for their valuations of players and risk not getting out of the door , which will seroiusly hamper Bruces chamces of bringing in his own players , or do the club sell cut price to get them off the wage bill and ensble Bruce to improve the squad.

The latter as long as we are not totally having our pants pulled down. We need to let SB bring in who he needs within the budget we have available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest mkowl
7 hours ago, Minton said:

 

Nothing. 3rd party ownership of players is banned

If you have read about the likes of some agencies then you will appreciate there are ways and means of circumventing this by the deal being a financing arrangement as opposed to ownership. 

 

So agency lends the money to club, club acquires player, if player gets sold then agency gets loan back plus potentially a % share of any profit.

 

No evidence to state this is the arrangement at SWFC of course 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, mkowl said:

If you have read about the likes of some agencies then you will appreciate there are ways and means of circumventing this by the deal being a financing arrangement as opposed to ownership. 

 

So agency lends the money to club, club acquires player, if player gets sold then agency gets loan back plus potentially a % share of any profit.

 

No evidence to state this is the arrangement at SWFC of course 

Yeah, but it's not like we had any players/ management who were tied in with any such agencies :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Ash76
1 hour ago, mkowl said:

No evidence to state this is the arrangement at SWFC of course 

 

Why mention it then? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, gurujuan said:

Have you seen it work recently, with that type of pairing

 

What type of pairing? Threads on ground sales and the effectiveness or not of a Fletcher/Rhodes striking partnership?

 

Nah, not really seen it work recently.

 

:Chansiri:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently there was more activity logged at Companies House yesterday involving SWFC Holdings, Sheffield 2, 3, 4, 5 etc

Can't claim to understand what it is though. Any experts?

Edited by simpark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Ash76
7 minutes ago, simpark said:

Apparently there was more activity logged at Companies House yesterday involving SWFC Holdings, Sheffield 2, 3, 4, 5 etc

Can't claim to understand what it is though. Any experts?

 

Not an expert but just had a look

 

Sheffield Wednesday Holdings Limited is still not registered at CH

 

Sheffield 2,4 & 5 limited had shares issued

 

Sheffield 3 is now controlled by Sheffield 5 and Sheffield 4 ceased to have control

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest mkowl
5 hours ago, Ash76 said:

 

Why mention it then? 

 

Why mention half the stuff folk do on here - its a forum about Sheffield Wednesday

 

Its not Pravda where only the official view of the world is permitted though I appreciate politically you might prefer that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...