Jump to content

Recommended Posts

if bruce was to keep one of winnall, nuhiu, or rhodes which one would you want to see retained?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


nuhiu

  • Like 1
  • Agree 6
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If money isn't the deciding factor and we're playing 4-4-2 then its Rhodes for for me. He's still got that goalscoring  potential at this level in the right system and I think a pairing with Fletcher could work. However if wages are brought into it then you probably get the most bang for your buck from Nuhiu. Not as a regular obviously but hes a good option from the bench to mix things up. Winnall is neither one thing or the other, works hard but hasn't really shown a great deal in his time with us and Bruce clearly doesn't see  him as anything other than a bit part player at best.

 

So in reality....probably Nuhiu.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think Rhodes is the only one Bruce rates.

 

Rhodes, alongside SF, with quality crosses raining in = goals.

  • Agree 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

tough one, if we can't recoup the money then I'll go for rhodes, otherwise Nuhiu

 

Rhodes has the biggest potential to score us the goals we need, if we can't get the money to buy someone with a better chance of that then the likelihood is we'll keep him (reckon we'll keep Nuhiu also though)

 

 

Edited by jomaco

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

So of the 3 would it be a) Winnall who he does play, b) Nuihu who has proved he cannot play or c) the nephew of his assistant Steve Agnew and of the 3 the only player to have scored goals this season at a rate better than 1 in every 10 games. :Sid:

Edited by room0035

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again if money isn't a factor and the recruitment across the team is better, then Rhodes.  We have just never partnered Rhodes with the right players.  Put quality out wide to deliver the ball, a runner in midfield to get beyond the strikers and I still think he would score plenty. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we can get the wingers to supply him , then Rhodes without a doubt.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

None of them.  

  • Agree 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you would have asked this 18 months ago, I would have said Winnall but if the decision was to be made now then it has to be Nuhiu. The sad fact is that although Winnall looked to have real potential, neither he nor Rhodes have produced for us. Rhodes looks like a spent force and has done for some time and Winnall has the recovery from a serious injury hanging over him. We know that Nuhiu can come on in the last twenty minutes and disrupt things and that’s why I’d retain him. 

 

Winnall’s “exile” to Derby was shambolic (as he had real potential before he was moved out) and his subsequent injury was more than frustrating. 

 

Rhodes’ recruitment was unnecessary and his time at Hillsborough has been disappointing to say the very least. What a disastrous episode. 

 

So my answer is Nuhiu. 

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly,neither of them tbh.:tango:

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It all boils down to who we may be able to sell. 

I know a few managers do rate Nuhiu, karanka was one of those that sings his praises along with pullis. 

 

Winnall would probably fit one of the promoted sides or a Blackburn /Bolton. 

 

Rhodes is the one I think will probably still be here next season as I'm not sure anyone will stump up cash for him.. 

If we're being realistic I expect joao & Nando to go before them and maybe hoopers contract not renewed and Bruce bringing a quick forward in. 

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a bit like being given the choice of the Yorkshire Ripper, John Christie or Gary Glitter to look after your daughter.

  • Haha 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d keep Rhodes. I think Bruce’s style of play could get a lot of goals from him. Also, by selling him/giving him away it will be detrimental to our FFP situation.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rhodes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, dorian gray said:

if bruce was to keep one of winnall, nuhiu, or rhodes which one would you want to see retained?

Rhodes 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, HillsboroughOwlNI said:

I’d keep Rhodes. I think Bruce’s style of play could get a lot of goals from him. Also, by selling him/giving him away it will be detrimental to our FFP situation.


Is this because the loss would reflect immediately, whereas the purchase cost can be spread across several years?

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've said it enough times Winnall and Rhodes partnership will be dynamite with the right service pace is lacking badly! And a tank in midfield who can distribute a decent ball this has the makings of autos IMO 

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...