Owly Mowly Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 So, if he is fit next week, does he come back in? I did think that with him and Aarons down the left we did look much much better. Would that mean Palmer is RB rather than Iorfa? Don’t think there is a lot in it. This line up looks bloody great to me.... Westwood Palmer Lees Hector Lazaar Reach Bannan Hutchinson Aarons Fletcher Hooper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debram Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 4 minutes ago, Owly Mowly said: So, if he is fit next week, does he come back in? I did think that with him and Aarons down the left we did look much much better. Would that mean Palmer is RB rather than Iorfa? Don’t think there is a lot in it. This line up looks bloody great to me.... Westwood Palmer Lees Hector Lazaar Reach Bannan Hutchinson Aarons Fletcher Hooper Think Hooper will fair a lot better with fletch, much better partnership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only way is S6 Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 Harsh on big bad Dom is that. Not done anything wrong, overlaps & scores. I think I’d drop Palmer to sub so he can cover either full back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debram Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 13 minutes ago, The only way is S6 said: Harsh on big bad Dom is that. Not done anything wrong, overlaps & scores. I think I’d drop Palmer to sub so he can cover either full back. Just the sort of problem bruce wants, competition for places with players on form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamworthowl Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 21 minutes ago, The only way is S6 said: Harsh on big bad Dom is that. Not done anything wrong, overlaps & scores. I think I’d drop Palmer to sub so he can cover either full back. Palmer can start and still cover at LB if required, with Iorfa covering RB. Could Reach's drop in form be (partly) down to moving Palmer from RB? They had become a good pairing. I don't think Reach/Iorfa are as effective. Putting Palmer back to RB might see an improvement in Reach too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldishowl Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 I wouldn’t rush Lazaar back. It was obvious yesterday that we had too many players out there who weren’t match fit. Palmer is match fit, we have now given Iorfa the time on the pitch to get up to fitness and he is looking sharper. If Aarons is out maybe consider given Lazaar some minutes on the left hand side of midfield. There is a massive difference between being over an injury and being match fit and it is our biggest problem at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S36 OWL Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 Two weeks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeder Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 3 hours ago, The only way is S6 said: Harsh on big bad Dom is that. Not done anything wrong, overlaps & scores. I think I’d drop Palmer to sub so he can cover either full back. Thought Palmer looked the more composed of the two yesterday (even played out of his favoured position.) If Reach carries on as he has over recent weeks maybe FF or Iorfa in front of Palmer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minton Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 We're wanting a faster-paced, more attacking style of play so Iorfa over Palmer all day long. Sorry Liam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flo Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 Keep Palmer at left back for now. Lazaar can wait for a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blatter Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 4 hours ago, Owly Mowly said: So, if he is fit next week, does he come back in? I did think that with him and Aarons down the left we did look much much better. Would that mean Palmer is RB rather than Iorfa? Don’t think there is a lot in it. This line up looks bloody great to me.... Westwood Palmer Lees Hector Lazaar Reach Bannan Hutchinson Aarons Fletcher Hooper Quite like the look of that lineup especially the tried and tested Fletcher Hooper pairing. They had a good understanding as a forward partnership when they were both fit and firing two seasons ago. Question is can they still do it consistently as age is catching up with both. My only problem would be dropping Iorfa who is improving game on game and has an eye for goal. By the same token it would be unfair to drop Palmer after stepping in effectively at left back. So for me it’s best to leave the back four as is for now with Lazaar on the bench if/when fit. Will be handy to have a pacy left sided sub as and when needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evaD Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 (edited) I'd stick with what's working for now. We've only have one match to judge Lazaar. More concerned about Aarons and Fletcher being fit Edited March 31, 2019 by evaD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weshallovercome Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 5 hours ago, Owly Mowly said: So, if he is fit next week, does he come back in? I did think that with him and Aarons down the left we did look much much better. Would that mean Palmer is RB rather than Iorfa? Don’t think there is a lot in it. This line up looks bloody great to me.... Westwood Palmer Lees Hector Lazaar Reach Bannan Hutchinson Aarons Fletcher Hooper Iorfa doesn't deserve to lose his place in the side, so I'd swap him for Reach who does. I do know he's not a winger, but he's already offered more on the wing in the last few games than Reach has 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul.. Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 Reach needs a rest IMO, I'd keep the back four as is, Lazaar at LW, Aarons when fit at RW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asteener1867 Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 5 hours ago, The only way is S6 said: Harsh on big bad Dom is that. Not done anything wrong, overlaps & scores. I think I’d drop Palmer to sub so he can cover either full back. Which is harsh on Palmer..but Iorfa is on a scoring streak...and with all due respect to Liam...he isn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shezzas left peg Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 For me Palmer has filled in admirably, but for me maybe better used as cover for hutch in dm if injured, or if we rest Iorfa, both positions he's naturally used to. Bringng a natural left footer back in at left back makes sense as it brings fluidity and balance in allowing us to be more fluid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest timrud Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 I would drop Palmer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUMBELOWS91 Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 We're not conceding many goals at the moment so I wouldn't change it yet, and with Lazaar being on loan there's not much point in playing him back to fitness unless we remain in the hunt for a play off place. Be better off letting Palmer have more game time there if we're going to offer him a new deal. If there's a chance we can get Lazaar permanently though that's a different story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmowl Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 In our last 8 games. Iorfa - scored 3 and made 1. From full-back! Reach - scored 2 and made 3. Won 4 Drawn 4. And some of us want to drop one or both???? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blatter Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 59 minutes ago, shezzas left peg said: For me Palmer has filled in admirably, but for me maybe better used as cover for hutch in dm if injured, or if we rest Iorfa, both positions he's naturally used to. Bringng a natural left footer back in at left back makes sense as it brings fluidity and balance in allowing us to be more fluid. I too would like to see if Palmer could stand in for Hutchinson. A long long time since he played there but I reckon he’d do better than Pelupessy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now