Jump to content

FF In court this am


Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Mycroft said:

 

She's entitled to her opinion as you are.

She is fella,quite right too,but as an aside,have you read any of her tweets for today,there's an air of guilt within her tweets towards Forestieri,an almost "he's gotten away with it" kind of deal.

Edited by DELUDED OWL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mycroft said:

 

Why do people keep banging on about innocence?  You might as well say he's a young man.

 

 

 

 

 

I think keep banging on about him being innocent because in this country you are innocent until proven guilty.

 

As for the second part of your response, I’ve no idea what you’re talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DELUDED OWL said:

Well,obviously one or two peeps on here,trial,verdict,not guilty,that should be the end of it right.............,not if you're Jemma page.

 

That should be the end of it?  Hardly it has to be mulled over, ripped apart, closely examined then will be forgotten about when the next little snippet of human folly rears its head.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, squonk said:

No one gets proven innocent 

 

They walk into court innocent and stay innocent until proven guilty FF was proven not guilty and walked from court an innocent man 

Well said Squonk! Clearly a highly intelligent, intuitive and perceptive summary for which you should receive emeritus status.

Common sense in a difficult world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope we learn our lesson and stop playing tinpot teams like this. 

 

Try to do them a favour, bring a bucket load of fans to their shittip, give their fans a day out and they can't even be bothered to be grateful. 

Edited by VBQ24
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, alanharper said:

 

Or Pearce didn't understand a word of what FF said as it was in Spanish, but it was clearly abusive so he played the race card.

 

 

Yes perhaps, but that is precisely the thing that firstly the police and then the CPS should have got to the bottom of before pursuing court action. It should have been one of the first points to press Pearce on.It should have only been pursued if Pearce gave a categorical assurance that he did understand what was said and absolutely clear in his mind that it was said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Buxtongent said:

Thanks, but may be rather less than previous, due , not to past , but to new health issues.The past is past, ok?

You've always been a sensible level headed poster on here, please keep posting, your opinion and comments are always welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...