Jump to content

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, JoshTheOwl said:

Did he touch the ball?

 

Yeah. About 30 seconds in when he crossed for Fletcher 

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Offered absolutely nothing, get him off the wage bill 

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Spondon Owl said:

I hope I never have to suffer watching him again. The lads did really well but Boyd is an empty shirt. 

 

Should have won... very solid. You never know.. plenty of points to play for. Just need fessi and joao fit.

 

All the things you can talk about tonight you single out this,   flipping hell

  • Disagree 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peripheral player, doesn’t seem to want to get involved

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally anonymous. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WalthamOwl said:

Please tell me his contract is up at the end of the season? 

It is, fortunately 

  • Like 4
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Spondon Owl said:

Should have won... very solid. 

Lol.

 

On what basis should we have won?

 

Had one decent chance all evening and were completely outclassed second half. Not to mention they should have had a penalty every time we defended a set piece due to Hector holding.

2 minutes ago, Rogers said:

He was put on to keep some shape and give the United back four less time on the ball. 

 

FF hasn’t got a hamstring injury imo, I think he just doesn’t do what the manager wants and was brought off.  You can’t press high with one striker; FF is playing too deep all the time. 

 

FF will be sold

FF was the only one who pressed first half. 

 

When they were passing it between their centre backs, Aarons just stood still whilst FF was chasing them down.

 

On topic, Boyd was an absolute disgrace and should never wear the shirt again.

  • Agree 1
  • Disagree 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, hawksmore said:

May be an unpopular opinion but I really want to see the back of the likes of Reach and Boyd. 

 

Weak, gutless, poor in the tackle and only mediocre pace as well as being too scared to get injured. 

 

 

 

Reach??? A good player and Bruce will get him playing properly 

 

Boyd is past it and will be out in the summer.

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, sternlad said:

Thought exactly the same...absolute waste of a shirt toneet. Wandered around a bit like a lost soul, a bit like Aarons in the first half. Thankfully he (Aarons) showed a bit more willing in the second half.

I thought Aaron’s was our only creative spark. I thought his pace and delivery was threatening in both halves, not just the second half.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Mardy Bum said:

Ff isn't injured

 

He was definitely holding his hamstring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's like he runs in treacle 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Iorfa looked a bit ring rusty

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, 2roland2 said:

 

All the things you can talk about tonight you single out this,   flipping hell

I have posted in other threads.. we've done really well. We've been solid, we've looked like we could get a goal occasionally against an organised side... 

 

I merely point out Boyd because unlike every other player I felt he added nothing. Matias's problem is he doesn't have a defensive bone is his body.

Edited by Spondon Owl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Spondon Owl said:

I have posted in other threads.. we've done really well. We've been solid, we've looked like we could get a goal occasionally against an organised side... 

 

I merely point out Boyd because unlike every other player I felt he added nothing. Matias's problem is he doesn't have a defensive bone is his body.

 

To be fair that is t boyds  usual position, he was asked to do a job he isn’t used too.

 

FF did nothing either in the first half and Fletcher found it hard. 

Both teams were well organised and none of the forwards for either side were allowed anything. 

  • Agree 1
  • Disagree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve just looked up “anonymous “ in the dictionary and it said “see George Boyd “

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SallyCinnamon said:

 

He was definitely holding his hamstring.

 

Yeah he was, saw him three times squeezing the back of it during last 6-7min of the half

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was a safe option from bruce and the only thing he got wrong tonight. Boyd doesnt deserve criticism he works hard its just the legs have gone. 

 

Matias or nuhiu would have been the better options, no ones favourite players but matias works hard enough and is capable of offering a genuine threat in behind as he doesnt run like hes towing a caravan. Personally id have gone with nuhiu, he could have played up top and fletch is more than capable of playing the link role, the game was pretty likely to be decided by a set piece and at least nuhiu offers something in both boxes.

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Spondon Owl said:

I have posted in other threads.. we've done really well. We've been solid, we've looked like we could get a goal occasionally against an organised side... 

 

I merely point out Boyd because unlike every other player I felt he added nothing. Matias's problem is he doesn't have a defensive bone is his body.

I think with Matias, it’s more a case of not holding our shape He’s certainly prepared to chase back, and offers far more than Boyd. A strange substitution 

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHY, JUST WHY, F#CKIN WHY WOULD YOU BRING BOYD ON????????

F#CKING SCANDALOUS DECISION.

  • Agree 2
  • Disagree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Boyd was the only option.

 

It's sad to say but we had no other options who are willing to put in a shift.

 

Matias can but not for 45 mins...he switches off too much at vital times.

 

Boyd was awful though...probs has 3 or 4 touches at best.

 

 

Edited by darra
  • Agree 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...