roaminowl Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 1 minute ago, The Captain said: Oh lighten up. Eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HirstWhoScoredIt Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 It was a red for dangerous play. Regardless it was a red because he was clean through on goal with no covering defender. How anybody thinks that wasn’t a red is absolutely beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HirstWhoScoredIt Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 18 minutes ago, The Captain said: In fairness, you score a goal in the 10th minutes of added time, I’d say we were the ones who got away with one. On the tacke, it’s late, cynical and clumsy. Definite yellow card, which the ref correctly gave. But it’s never a sending off. He was clean through with no covering defender. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hirst1867 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 19 minutes ago, Ash76 said: Reckless and dangerous, sending off by letter of the law. The one on Hutchinson was borderline a red too The one on Hutch was even worse They should have both been red - as should the elbow that knocked out Thorniley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYCOWL Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Red Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest timrud Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 If Ronnie Moore, who is up there with Porker Edwards in the biased olympics said he was lucky to stay on, then that says it all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Shezza Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 1 minute ago, The Captain said: You don’t think it was late, cynical and clumsy then? I've played football and watched 2 minutes ago, The Captain said: You don’t think it was late, cynical and clumsy then? It was late, cynical and high. Nando was clear and the guy was never getting to the ball. The defender covers lots of ground to get to the tackle, giving him plenty of time to judge whether he will get there and how he's going to tackle. He leads with his right foot with his back to Nando which means he must raise his foot. Look where he contacts Nando, on the leg. I was at the game and thought it a red. They booted Nando off the park. Lots of fouls on him, maybe double figures, which suggests they singled him out. Also, lots of late challenges in the game and their players leaving a foot in. You're miles off the mark pal, he could have easily broken his leg or ankle. Not clumsy for me but reckless. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigblueowl Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 24 minutes ago, The Captain said: In fairness, you score a goal in the 10th minutes of added time, I’d say we were the ones who got away with one. On the tacke, it’s late, cynical and clumsy. Definite yellow card, which the ref correctly gave. But it’s never a sending off. That's a potential career ending tackle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LittleG Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 25 minutes ago, The Captain said: In fairness, you score a goal in the 10th minutes of added time, I’d say we were the ones who got away with one. On the tacke, it’s late, cynical and clumsy. Definite yellow card, which the ref correctly gave. But it’s never a sending off. Tell me you're joking; that was cynical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
full fathom five Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 24 minutes ago, The Captain said: In fairness, you score a goal in the 10th minutes of added time, I’d say we were the ones who got away with one. On the tacke, it’s late, cynical and clumsy. Definite yellow card, which the ref correctly gave. But it’s never a sending off. He's gone in late with studs showing with full intent of getting the man not the ball, it's a red card all dsy long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westfield Owl Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 9 minutes ago, DELUDED OWL said: Brian Laws and Ronnie Moore both called him lucky to stay on after that,Red card everyday of the week. He was lucky to stay on. Where have I stated differently? 7 minutes ago, HirstWhoScoredIt said: He was clean through with no covering defender. I know. But FF was a long way from goal. Looks like the Rotherham player went cynically to take one for the team by making sure FF didn’t get into a goal scoring scoring position. Oh well. Clearly I’m in the minority but I wasn’t expecting a red for that. Neg away everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debram Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 1 minute ago, full fathom five said: He's gone in late with studs showing with full intent of getting the man not the ball, it's a red card all dsy long. And he was last man 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BARMYARMY2010 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Just now, The Captain said: He was lucky to stay on. Where have I stated differently? I know. But FF was a long way from goal. Looks like the Rotherham player went cynically to take one for the team by making sure FF didn’t get into a goal scoring scoring position. Oh well. Clearly I’m in the minority but I wasn’t expecting a red for that. Neg away everyone Erm..............................".On the tacke, it’s late, cynical and clumsy. Definite yellow card, which the ref correctly gave. But it’s never a sending off." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trevdi9 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 bloody leg breaker that is ,he knew what he was doing and should have walked ,as should the other one who led with his arm on Hutch ,if anything the ref should visit spec savers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westfield Owl Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Just now, DELUDED OWL said: Erm..............................".On the tacke, it’s late, cynical and clumsy. Definite yellow card, which the ref correctly gave. But it’s never a sending off." Nah try again mate. I never stated the Rotherham player wasn’t lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BARMYARMY2010 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Just now, The Captain said: Nah try again mate. I never stated the Rotherham player wasn’t lucky. WTF.......................? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LittleG Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, The Captain said: He was lucky to stay on. Where have I stated differently? I know. But FF was a long way from goal. Looks like the Rotherham player went cynically to take one for the team by making sure FF didn’t get into a goal scoring scoring position. Oh well. Clearly I’m in the minority but I wasn’t expecting a red for that. Neg away everyone Ok, I'll neg you again just for talking absolute Shiite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_weds_we_love_you Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 33 minutes ago, The Captain said: In fairness, you score a goal in the 10th minutes of added time, I’d say we were the ones who got away with one. On the tacke, it’s late, cynical and clumsy. Definite yellow card, which the ref correctly gave. But it’s never a sending off. Reckless and dangerous lunge miles away from the ball. It was pretty high too. Modern day football it’s a red every day, week, and month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westfield Owl Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Ok since everyone has ripped the p*ss out of me for having an opinion, I’ve just re-watched the clip another 10 times or so. I can’t really tell from the clip whether the Rotherham player’s left leg is on the pitch when he slides in and I also don’t think that the studs connect with FF’s leg. It looks like no studs connected thankfully because otherwise it could have been a nasty one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Shezza Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 18 minutes ago, The Captain said: Ok since everyone has ripped the p*ss out of me for having an opinion, I’ve just re-watched the clip another 10 times or so. I can’t really tell from the clip whether the Rotherham player’s left leg is on the pitch when he slides in and I also don’t think that the studs connect with FF’s leg. It looks like no studs connected thankfully because otherwise it could have been a nasty one. If you’ve only seen the blurred video I can understand why you might not see it like others. It’s like JFK looking like he fainted. You don’t seen his brains on the back seat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now