Costello 77 Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 He's at the Rubicon agewise if he wants to cross he needs some dog in him and some heavy work on his close skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash77 Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 Solid left midfielder and best on left as not great technically or decision making wise and weak right foot. Great runner, bruce should keep it simple and play him in a 442 on left for good cover to lb and decent crosses in final 3rd, play matias on right. His movement can create the space to get into crossing positions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheriwozgod Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 Always fit and can hit a ball (given space and time) other than that an average champ player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
full fathom five Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 22 minutes ago, ReadingOwl said: I rate him. Good engine and endeavour. Always fit too. Would be an asset to any quality squad - even a Premiership one. The lad must have a heart the size of a dustbin lid, trying to carry this squad week in week out. Spot on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debram Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 3 minutes ago, jonnyowl said: Wouldn't class him as a luxury player. Apart from 2 30 yarders what has he done! Ahh, agree hardly luxury, I overrated him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUMBELOWS91 Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 30 minutes ago, JOHNHARKES said: Is it me or has he been wee wee poor for the last 5 games. Completely bang average tonight. When had chance to put himself in shop window. Take 12m now if true re wolves. I do actually like Reach but there isnt a fine line in fans opinion of him. Im bang in the middle he isnt brilliant nor shyyyte just an above average Championship player. Yep, definitely a player that you'd want to keep, but realistically if the money is good we should be cashing in given our current situation. Certainly not irreplaceable, but then we've never really been much good at digging out cut price gems on a regular basis. Hopefully our scouting/contacts will be a little better now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOHNHARKES Posted January 27, 2019 Author Share Posted January 27, 2019 7 minutes ago, ZicoSterland2 said: Tried hard tonight but he cant play without the ball. We were outclassed but I wouldnt criticise any of them. Chelsea are top 4 premier league . After the top 6 no other teams can compete. Day out for the fans but the result was much as expected. See my other comment further up pal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheriwozgod Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 24 minutes ago, ReadingOwl said: I rate him. Good engine and endeavour. Always fit too. Would be an asset to any quality squad - even a Premiership one. The lad must have a heart the size of a dustbin lid, trying to carry this squad week in week out. Nah not having that Reading mate...………...if he was "carrying" us he would have shown a lot more for the ball and led by example much more than he did...…….seemed content to hide for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMOwl72 Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 Tbf Reach, Boyd, Fletcher, Pelupessy all anonymous tonight. The overall set up was wrong. You saw what impact the Chelsea players with a bit of pace had on the game. Long balls up to Fletcher with no other Wedensday player within 15-20m of him and the back four sat deep inside our own half was never going to trouble them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZicoSterland2 Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 27 minutes ago, Lord Snooty said: Would look better in a better side. Bang right. We didnt have the ball and he is not the type to win it. Gulf in class is massive. Sad thing is 30 years ago we were as big a club as Chelsea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Chow Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 Slightly over rated at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazowl55 Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 57 minutes ago, sMacLean said: These games show players up. Bannan also often lauded as one of the best midfielders in the Champ but not a chance he'd ever get a game in the Prem. Certainly don't see a Prem side playing Reach. Possible a relegation candidate might pick him up with a view to Champ football. How are you expected to look like a Prem player when you are up against some of the best footballers in the country when playing for an above average non attacking championship team. I don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshOwl Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 1 hour ago, Not Jon Newsome said: Because he was playing in a poor Championship side against one of Europe's best teams? Reyt. Give over, he could barely even run with the ball. Definitely looked like nerves got the better of him, but he was one of our poorest players tonight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 reach has been poo for 95% of this season when was last time everyone thought 'he was unplayable today' or he deserved man the match the fact that people on here think he is one of our best players just shows how disastrous our recruitment has been. can anyone serious say we'd miss him if he went ,sell at the first opportunity and take someone's pants down like Middlesbrough did to us id be happy £2 million at the moment ,never mind £20 million what some crackpots have said on here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponte_Owl85 Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 What did Reach do that's so wrong today that justifies singling him out? Honestly don't understand it. He was as good/poor as most of the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Tom Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 (edited) Harsh IMO, absolutely walks into this team and *if* there’s a problem then maybe that’s it, not Reach himself. He’s good at our level. Always looked our most likely tonight. Needs to play wide though. If we had five midfielders capable of keeping Adam Reach on the bench week in week out, we wouldn’t be in the championship. Honestly, I think some people forget where we’re at as a club this past decade. Reach is one of our best. Without him and Bannan last couple of seasons we’d have been tragic. Edited January 27, 2019 by Mr. Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Tom Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 2 hours ago, ZicoSterland2 said: Tried hard tonight but he cant play without the ball. This gets to the crux of it. It’s not his game and tbf it’s not supposed to be. Our issue is we have no players for that role. Not a Reach issue at all. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edmontonowl Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 2 hours ago, Lord Snooty said: Would look better in a better side. My wife says I look better in a George Clooney mask 2 hours ago, twolaptops said: He is Petr Rudi MK2......................get shut if offered a good price That's Boyd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReginaldD Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 4 hours ago, Not Jon Newsome said: Because he was playing in a poor Championship side against one of Europe's best teams? Reyt. Yep I agree, put him in the Wolves team and I don't think he'd look out of place 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
full fathom five Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 Some Chelsea fans don't rate Willian, some Wednesday fans don't rate Reach. They are wrong obviously but there you go. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now