Jump to content

Updates - FF, Bannan, Hutch and Onamah


Recommended Posts

Guest addedtime
43 minutes ago, Owlsend said:

I don’t know I’m still in shock  mm still Isn’t injured what is it been now four games:Pelupessy:

Who is MM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, helmut_rooster said:

Guess we are to assume that Abdi's gangrene is no better?

 

I thought we'd been told (by DC) Abdi is a wee pipe and that's incurable so he's off indefinitely. Would've expected him to be shipped out this window but hardly the best advertising to be associated with your name just before a transfer window... that, and the only time seen in football gear in the past year or so has been a few, glossy "FIFA Fair Play" ads of him on twitter or such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Animis said:

On Onamah, Is it normal that a loanee returns to his parent club? 

 

Seem to remember Winnall staying at Derby last Spring to receive treatment.

Probably upto the parent club , they have better facilities so wanted to take over 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stocksyuto said:

Probably upto the parent club , they have better facilities so wanted to take over 

 

yes - that was my thought, which, with Winnall staying at Derby when he was injured implies they also have better facilities. 

 

I know we've suffered from a general lack of investment off the pitch over the last 20 years, and i wonder just how our medical/treatments services/facilities compare with even our peers. 

 

I do wonder if there is a direct link from this to the amount of injuries we have seen at the club for years. Always seems disproportionate, but i'm not sure what the levels are at other clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, billyblack said:

Onomah, hamstring at 21, not good.

If he's another month away, then needing to regain match fitness can't see him making much meaningful contribution until March.

 

With potentially only a handful of games at the back end  the season, wouldn't surprise me if we've asked the question about ending the loan early to bring in another player, particularly as he's back at Spurs for treatment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Animis said:

 

yes - that was my thought, which, with Winnall staying at Derby when he was injured implies they also have better facilities. 

 

I know we've suffered from a general lack of investment off the pitch over the last 20 years, and i wonder just how our medical/treatments services/facilities compare with even our peers. 

 

I do wonder if there is a direct link from this to the amount of injuries we have seen at the club for years. Always seems disproportionate, but i'm not sure what the levels are at other clubs.

Derby's facilities are premier league apparently, way better than ours in any case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mike312 said:

Derby's facilities are premier league apparently, way better than ours in any case.

 

yes - I imagine you're right.

 

It must be a fine accounting balance to make the correct investment into injury prevention and treatment to minimise the impact on your major assets. I do wonder how clubs approach this other than open the check book once you're in the PL. 

 

We've significantly increased the investment in players over the last three years, with the annual financial liability flirting with FFP. You would expect clubs look to protect this investment by investing into the best facilities to looking after it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...