stocksyuto Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 DC will not take 10 million no way when Fulham were apparently in for forestieri offering 15 dc kept them away by saying he wanted 20 mil he’ll do the same with reach and if anyone’s mad enough to spend that then they can have him 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doubleo Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 BOGOF - only if they'll take Abdi as well ! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jp1981 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, stocksyuto said: DC will not take 10 million no way when Fulham were apparently in for forestieri offering 15 dc kept them away by saying he wanted 20 mil he’ll do the same with reach and if anyone’s mad enough to spend that then they can have him How much did Leicester pay for Maddison, 22 mill? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adelphi1867 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 29 minutes ago, HOOTIE AND THE poo TU said: 10 million and Hourihane + add on's. 25% sell on clause, extra money if promoted with villa, etc. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ash76 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 People that think we should take £10m for Reach don’t understand the game Perfect age, great engine, rarely injured and the ability to single handedly win games. Any lower than £15m would be very disappointing For evidence look at the fees of Josh Murphy and James Maddison Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owler66 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Remember when we selt our best player Dalian Atkinson and used the money to strengthen the team those were the days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChinaOwl Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 1 minute ago, owler66 said: Remember when we selt our best player Dalian Atkinson and used the money to strengthen the team those were the days Out of interest, did you think Big Dalian was better than Hirst, Nilsson, Sheridan or Palmer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casbahowl Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 (edited) 14 minutes ago, stocksyuto said: DC will not take 10 million no way when Fulham were apparently in for forestieri offering 15 dc kept them away by saying he wanted 20 mil he’ll do the same with reach and if anyone’s mad enough to spend that then they can have him This exactly! Wolves set the bar for a championship player at £20 million when they signed Adama from Boro. Reach is in that category plus he’s English ..... why do Wednesdayites want to undersell our best players ..... the Chairman won’t! Edited January 8, 2019 by casbahowl 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshOwl Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, Ash76 said: People that think we should take £10m for Reach don’t understand the game Perfect age, great engine, rarely injured and the ability to single handedly win games. Any lower than £15m would be very disappointing For evidence look at the fees of Josh Murphy and James Maddison Bingo Ill be honest I’m not the biggest fan of Reach. Yes I rate him as an above championship midfielder and has a great engine but has a lot of improving to do and still goes missing a lot Moving to a PL club will bring that improvement into his game Would take anything above £10m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jack the Hat Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 6 minutes ago, ChinaOwl said: Out of interest, did you think Big Dalian was better than Hirst, Nilsson, Sheridan or Palmer? No he wasn't and he forced a move because we got relegated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owlsend Posted January 8, 2019 Author Share Posted January 8, 2019 Don’t get me wrong I like reach he’s a player with good quality but only good now and again he has his moments a flash in the pan 50% of the games he’s not even in it 10 million might not sound a lot maybe worth more but it’s a hell of a lot more than what we paid and I can only imagine what Bruce would be able to do with half of that money wage bill down possibly a More persistent quality player coming in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Not a popular opinion on here but any offer that is north of £10M has to be considered. We’re not very good when it comes to selling and to a certain extent buying. Would we miss Reach, maybe? But not as much as some think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Box_Man Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 I would take £10-12 million if cash was payable up front not over 2-3 years plus Hourihane coming the other way and a 20% sell on clause. Would be great business....and if Wolves do want him stick another 5 million on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BARMYARMY2010 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 50 minutes ago, Roy Of The Roasters said: I would be sorry to lose him, but we're not in a position where we can afford to turn down an attractive offer for any of our players. We are if the "attractive" offer isnt seen as enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencerowl Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Be really surprised if reach went TBH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Hunt Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Reach is a good player no doubt and his value is whatever someone wants to pay plus what we would accept , the thing is I reckon we are shoe horning him into the side as a central midfielder and for me he is nowhere near a central midfielder , I reckon Bruce could do a lot with the funds for a player who really has not got a position he can call his when Onomah is back I reckon he will get one of the midfield berths , If we line up like Agnew eluded to then its a back 3 , 3 central and 2 flank players , Reach could go wide in that set up so who knows ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencerowl Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 24 minutes ago, Ash76 said: People that think we should take £10m for Reach don’t understand the game Perfect age, great engine, rarely injured and the ability to single handedly win games. Any lower than £15m would be very disappointing For evidence look at the fees of Josh Murphy and James Maddison Agree 15m plus for me, anything lower in this crazy market seems cheap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owler66 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 22 minutes ago, ChinaOwl said: Out of interest, did you think Big Dalian was better than Hirst, Nilsson, Sheridan or Palmer? At that time yes and the fee proved it 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eightace Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 I'd hate to think how many chances we'd have a game if he went. Too important to let go imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChinaOwl Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 3 minutes ago, owler66 said: At that time yes and the fee proved it OK, it's a matter of opinion of course. He was certainly a good player and I was sorry to see him leave at the time. But I don't think he was the best player in the side. The fee simply reflected the value put on goal scoring forwards (as has generally been the case in football. Clubs pay inflated prices for goal scorers). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now