What's bullets win rate then ?

[LiamAP22D 590]

Over his 2 spells? Can't even remember how many games he got last season as interim.

[Plonk 5,018]

poo last time brill this. 

[McRightSide 5,454]

5 games

3 wins

1 draw 

1 defeat 

[Loughborough Owl 4]

42.86%

[flo 3,088]

Nice

[Loughborough Owl 4]

6 minutes ago, LiamAP22D said:

Over his 2 spells? Can't even remember how many games he got last season as interim.

42.86% pal

[LiamAP22D 590]

6 minutes ago, McRightSide said:

5 games

3 wins

1 draw 

1 defeat 

That makes it 60% right ? So is the other dude wrong ? 

[SupremeOwl 738]

Certainly not firing blanks at the minute...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'll get my coat. 

[RockieOwl 418]

He had 3 games last time? Forest, Burton, Brentford. Maybe 4 including the cup game at Carlisle. So 3 wins, 2 draws, 2 defeats

[Beighton Owl 87 437]

He had 3 games last season and 3 this season so far. His win ratio is 50%.

[Junk Smuggler 3,619]

It's probably a little false as he's taken over after managerial firings. You generally get an upturn in results for short spells so hope that DC doesn't decide to give him the job full time based on the last 3 games as I think over a long run of games it be a lot less. No disrespect to Bullen but we should be giving it to someone who's as least managed and at this level too.

[Junk Smuggler 3,619]

10 minutes ago, Loughborough Owl said:

42.86%

 

This suggests he's been in charge for a large number of games for it to be .86%

[briggowl 472]

Let's not forget he said he doesn't want to be a manager, would probably run a mile from the suggestion of the job, like last time around and he orchestrated a 3-0 loss at home to Burton which was the worst Wednesday performance I've seen at Hillsboro for a while. Still he's done very well this time around.

[McRightSide 5,454]

22 minutes ago, LiamAP22D said:

That makes it 60% right ? So is the other dude wrong ? 

 

I might be wrong, someone mentioned Carlisle which i didn’t consider.

 

In any case i don’t think a win rate for such a short period of time particularly tells us anything anyway

Edited December 29, 2018 by McRightSide

[darklord 10,613]

5 minutes ago, McRightSide said:

 

I might be wrong, someone mentioned Carlisle which i didn’t consider.

 

In any case i don’t think a win rate for such a short period of time particularly tells us anything anyway

 

You mean Big Sams 100% as England manager isn't with anything? Lol

[Quadzilla 507]

Also he's had two new manager bounce periods. He's done a good job this time around but it's pretty much a free swing.

[LittleG 959]

33 minutes ago, Junk Smuggler said:

It's probably a little false as he's taken over after managerial firings. You generally get an upturn in results for short spells so hope that DC doesn't decide to give him the job full time based on the last 3 games as I think over a long run of games it be a lot less. No disrespect to Bullen but we should be giving it to someone who's as least managed and at this level too.

I like what you did there "firings"

[The only way is S6 3,998]

3 minutes ago, LittleG said:

I like what you did there "firings"

 

Me too. Thought the OP would be shot down more, with the gaff.

[Hack-Abusi 2,097]

3 leagues games

 

1 cup game

 

1st time he won 1, lost 2 in league,

 

Drew in cup

 

25% win rate

 

This time around,  3 league games,  2 wins, 1 draw.

 

66.66% win rate

 

50% in league, 42.87% including cup game

[roaminowl 10,590]

Concede any more late goals and people will be gunning for him.