West Brom - V - Wednesday OMDT

[Birley Owl 1867]

4 minutes ago, Lord Snooty said:

 

He said Fletch was feeling it after consecutive starts and he didn't really want to risk him where possible with the games coming thick and fast. Also that Winnall has been working tremendously hard in training and he wanted to give him some minutes as a bit of a bonus and we'll done,

Thsts all well and good but a lack of focal point upfront may have cost us 3 points.

[squonk]

3 minutes ago, airborne_rat_of_s6 said:

Gets worse the more you view it. DJ’s is dogger

Get bent 

 

The ball comes over a scrummage of players and hits him no fault at all to either Jones or Dawson 

[Ray Von shabba]

3 minutes ago, airborne_rat_of_s6 said:

Gets worse the more you view it. DJ’s is dogger

Simple issue, no man on the post.

[Lord Snooty]

1 hour ago, Birley Owl 1867 said:

Thsts all well and good but a lack of focal point upfront may have cost us 3 points.

 

Well that's true. But then so may 9 minutes of injury time. Bannan not taking the ball  to the corner or finding Boyd near the end. Westwood being being too tired to play.  A gust of wind.  We don't want Nuhiu starting and it costs us points when he comes off.  

We played these at home and bringing a kid  midfielder in cost us. Today we've other posts on here saying bringing an experienced midfielder on have cost is. Litterslly polar opposites on the sub spectrum. But both decisions have cost us. But if we'd left Hutch on..thst might have cost us. 

Winnall pops up with a winner and it's a genius sub changing a hold up striker for someone more mobile. 

 

Still an excellent point for me in a game many expected nothing from.

7 from 9 at Christmas.  That'll do me.

[Guest everydays_wednesday]

22 hours ago, heppers said:

 

Thanks Nostradamus 

You are welcome.....you will win the national lottery 2019 !