wawawuto Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 May as well play with 10 men than play either Palmer or Baker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
33 Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 Cool story Bro 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
33 Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 (edited) But are they as shît as you are at threads? . Edited December 2, 2018 by 33 #wawawutorubbishthreads 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRADDO Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 Ooooooooookaaaaaaaaaay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wawawuto Posted December 2, 2018 Author Share Posted December 2, 2018 1 minute ago, 33 said: But are they as poo as you are at threads? Or you at putting the same reply on every one? ...... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
33 Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 Do you have some missing genetic code? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wawawuto Posted December 2, 2018 Author Share Posted December 2, 2018 Just now, 33 said: Do you have some missing genetic code? Yes 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Castleford Owl Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 We had a perfectly capable right back that we decided to sell on the cheap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAL Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wawawuto Posted December 2, 2018 Author Share Posted December 2, 2018 Just now, MAL said: Hahaha you know I'm right though. Calamity Palmer or Baker who is nowhere near ready Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
33 Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 Irony Alert 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gurujuan Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 5 minutes ago, Castleford Owl said: We had a perfectly capable right back that we decided to sell on the cheap We got good money for someone who wasn’t any better than Palmer Probably one of our better bits of transfer dealing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Castleford Owl Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 15 minutes ago, gurujuan said: We got good money for someone who wasn’t any better than Palmer Probably one of our better bits of transfer dealing You reckon? Whatever people thought of Hunt, Palmer nor Baker aren’t even half as capable. I wouldn’t class £1.5 million as good money considering the daft amounts being chucked around nowadays, even in this league Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gurujuan Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 1 minute ago, Castleford Owl said: You reckon? Whatever people thought of Hunt, Palmer nor Baker aren’t even half as capable. I wouldn’t class £1.5 million as good money considering the daft amounts being chucked around nowadays, even in this league Fair enough, opinions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOOTIE AND THE SHIT TU Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 29 minutes ago, 33 said: Do you have some missing genetic code? -RB 1 Just a bloke, who used up all his luck in one go when he met his wife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pat blondeau Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 I was at Blackburn yesterday and both right and left back are weak links. I don’t like to slate Thorniley, Penney or Baker because they’re young lads making their way in the game (and Thorniley isn’t really a left back anyway and wasn’t getting much support in front of him). Palmer is an experienced pro so there’s no excuse. He just isn’t good enough. Surely Hutchinson or Boyd could do a job at full back and would be an improvement on what’s currently there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendaryswan Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 Hunt was always a cut above palmer,that should be looking much clearer now to the doubters. Thing I cant fathom is why JL persists with 3 CBs when we dont have enough quality between the three we have.We under invested in defence under CC,VA was poor business,hes no better than what we already had,and both those,Loovens and Lees cost us nowt,to boot we could have had Sasso on a free,and Venancio for peanuts and lost out on both and we still need an experienced keeper going foreward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gurujuan Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 3 minutes ago, legendaryswan said: Hunt was always a cut above palmer,that should be looking much clearer now to the doubters. Thing I cant fathom is why JL persists with 3 CBs when we dont have enough quality between the three we have.We under invested in defence under CC,VA was poor business,hes no better than what we already had,and both those,Loovens and Lees cost us nowt,to boot we could have had Sasso on a free,and Venancio for peanuts and lost out on both and we still need an experienced keeper going foreward Venancio was a big miss, and I don’t know why we persist with a 3, not least because Lees always plays better in a 4 He does play better with Thorniley as his partner though. As for our full backs, Palmer and Penney are OK at this level, certainly no worse than Hunt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pat blondeau Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 1 minute ago, legendaryswan said: Hunt was always a cut above palmer,that should be looking much clearer now to the doubters. Thing I cant fathom is why JL persists with 3 CBs when we dont have enough quality between the three we have.We under invested in defence under CC,VA was poor business,hes no better than what we already had,and both those,Loovens and Lees cost us nowt,to boot we could have had Sasso on a free,and Venancio for peanuts and lost out on both and we still need an experienced keeper going foreward Problem is when we’ve played 3 at the back we’ve looked more solid defensively but we don’t have anyone good enough to play as a wing back with attacking quality. So it just ends up as a back 5. And if we play 4 at the back we’re conceding a hatful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OwlinOldham Posted December 3, 2018 Share Posted December 3, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, nilsson said: Problem is when we’ve played 3 at the back we’ve looked more solid defensively but we don’t have anyone good enough to play as a wing back with attacking quality. So it just ends up as a back 5. And if we play 4 at the back we’re conceding a hatful This a million times over! Wingbacks need to also provide some support to the midfield in winning the ball back when you dont have the ball, and ours dont. Instead of us having palmer, joey, bannan and Penney all trying to win it back in midfield, it becomes just joey and bannan (if hes not run off up the pitch), as palmer and penney always drop in to make it a flat back 5. This means teams walk through our non exiatent midfield, and our back 5 made up of 3 cbs and 2 converted midfielders into wingbcks, are simply just not good enough to deal with what comes next. Edited December 3, 2018 by OwlinOldham Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now