Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
s6 owl

Lucas Piazon signing for #SWFC?

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Athelwulf said:

Finance isn't the problem, but being allowed to spend it is.

 

Something's obviously happened behind the scenes if the club are interested in Piazon.

 

Fulham were big money in this division, and he's played for some big clubs like Eintracht.

 

His wages I would imagine will be tasty.

 

I don't think FF is going, so loopholes must have been exploited or favours called in.

We need to break even this year due to p+s.

 

So we need income, from somewhere.

 

The signing makes no sense. Am I the only one who sees that?

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Athelwulf said:

Well, Chansiri did say "don't worry about FFP".

Aye there is that. However joking aside, we are a bit late rebuilding the side, spendagedden wise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Maddogbob said:

We need to break even this year due to p+s.

 

So we need income, from somewhere.

 

The signing makes no sense. Am I the only one who sees that?

 

I take your point, in as much as if any money needs to be spent it's in defence.

 

I have the feeling that there's been a change.

 

Maybe, by sharp practice, Chansiri has found a loophole.

 

I mean, the problem isn't a lack of money, and never was.

 

It's simply that our turnover isn't large enough to allow us to spend more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Athelwulf said:

 

I take your point, in as much as if any money needs to be spent it's in defence.

 

I have the feeling that there's been a change.

 

Maybe, by sharp practice, Chansiri has found a loophole.

 

I mean, the problem isn't a lack of money, and never was.

 

It's simply that our turnover isn't large enough to allow us to spend more.

Agree, I do believe the money is there. It's just a strange deal to do. If we need the money to balance the books on paper.

 

Time will tell, I guess.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if Chelsea are subsidising the deal heavily or completely?

  • Like 1
  • Agree 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good signings if it's happening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if it was a was but wasn’t an it would it be posibble? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, fpowl said:

What if it was a was but wasn’t an it would it be posibble? 

This may have just damaged my brain.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, fpowl said:

What if it was a was but wasn’t an it would it be posibble? 

 

Is the answer spam? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still don't understand how we could be under a transfer embargo supposedly for months and then suddenly be potentially able to bring in a couple of loanees even though nothing of much significance appears to have changed.

  • Agree 2
  • Disagree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, AwokenGiant said:

 

Is the answer spam? 

Nope sorry 

 

it’s was rainbows 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AwokenGiant said:

 

Is the answer spam? 

 

Fritters ? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DJMortimer said:

I still don't understand how we could be under a transfer embargo supposedly for months and then suddenly be potentially able to bring in a couple of loanees even though nothing of much significance appears to have changed.

This is my guess but I think we have spent the last few months trying to convince the football league that our income is genuine income and can be used for FFP purposes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if money is tight we need to be picky about signings. Hector would be a logical addition, but Piazon doesn't seem to offer anything particularly different to what we've got.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like Piazon to sign on the basis that we could us The Clash's 'Spanish bombs' as his song.

 

Cannot be arsed to figure out all the lyrics but the, 'oh my corrazon' line can be, 'oh, Lucas Piazon.'

 

and before you all say...

 

...you're welcome!

Edited by 1/10/1983
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s hard to see where Piazon would fit in without either a Reach or Fessi missing out, but competition amongst quality players is always healthy 

 

He would be an excellent addition 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Royal_D said:

It’s hard to see where Piazon would fit in without either a Reach or Fessi missing out, but competition amongst quality players is always healthy 

 

He would be an excellent addition 

On today’s showing, I’d be happy to leave Reach out

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Maddogbob said:

We need to break even this year due to p+s.

 

So we need income, from somewhere.

 

The signing makes no sense. Am I the only one who sees that?

 

If Westwood leaves on loan, why wouldn't it make sense?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...