Jump to content


@owlstalk

#SWFC NEWS | Mansfield report racist abuse offence to police and FA

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, S36 OWL said:

Quite simple in my opinion. 

 

IF a wednesday player made racist comments he should have the book thrown at him by the police AND the fa , regardless who the player is. 

 

IF the police find there is no evidence of any wrongdoing , then whoever it was from Mansfield Town who reported it to the police ,should be charged with wasting police time. 

 

Either way , im sure all will come out in the wesh before too long. 

 

If they don't find any evidence that doesn't mean that no offence was committed.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Guest Xxxxxxxxcxcc
1 minute ago, Watson said:

 

If they don't find any evidence that doesn't mean that no offence was committed.

Yes they'd need evidence that he'd deliberately made a false accusation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Watson said:

 

If they don't find any evidence that doesn't mean that no offence was committed.

Be virtually impossible to find "evidence" full stop in this matter.

 

Fwiw..if there's no case to answer..and I was the accused, I certainly wouldn't appreciate your post..even though it's factually correct.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dumboldowl said:

 

Did I suggest that they should ?

 

With you complaining about their slowness it was at least easy to think according to those lines, yes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Costello 77 said:

Be virtually impossible to find "evidence" full stop in this matter.

 

Fwiw..if there's no case to answer..and I was the accused, I certainly wouldn't appreciate your post..even though it's factually correct.

 

My post wasn't meant to sound 'nasty'.

 

Further, at court, you are found guilty or not guilty, innocence doesn't come into it. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Watson said:

 

I don't think they were chosen coz they were white it was because they were vulnerable. 

Please refer to the excellent and harrowing BBC drama “Three Girls” where it portrays that their vulnerability made it easy but the fact that they were “white” gave them “badge of honour” status to the Rochdale predators!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Watson said:

 

My post wasn't meant to sound 'nasty'.

 

Further, at court, you are found guilty or not guilty, innocence doesn't come into it. 

There's no point in the justice system then.

Not guilty means not guilty and guilty means guilty.

 

It's wrong to leave a cloud over anybody after a judgement.

 

The legal system is all we've got although it's not perfect.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, casbahowl said:

Please refer to the excellent and harrowing BBC drama “Three Girls” where it portrays that their vulnerability made it easy but the fact that they were “white” gave them “badge of honour” status to the Rochdale predators!

 

So no none white girls were involved at all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 


It's all going a bit 'twitter' innit


Let's get back on topic 

 


 


Amazon | Broadband | AirBnb

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right or wrong this thread is discussing some important social issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Eightace said:

Blurting something out in the heat as you say may very well be racist.

But somehow I find it different.

If you are friends with people of a certain race, wouldn't judge people of a certain race or deny them equal opportunities, have no I'll feeling towards people of said race, then I would find it hard to think of myself as a racist just because I got mardy and hit someone with a low blow in a fight.

I just feel there are certain levels of racism where you don't deserve hanging.

I'm glad to see this thread still going and it's not got too tasty.

But I'm out now.

I would like to think of the allegations are true then it could be handled sensitively , fairly and with common sense.

IE no massive court case and throwing tomatoes at someone in the stocks just because it's the thing to be seen doing.

That's how I see things .

I know I'm in the wrong but it's how you treat people for me .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Watson said:

 

So no none white girls were involved at all?

No idea but the vast majority were targeted because they were white!

The BBC aren't exactly known for their ultra right wing views so before you indulge in any more child like responses like the one above I suggest you watch the docu -drama "Three Girls" and the subsequent discussion program, both are available online!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, casbahowl said:

No idea but the vast majority were targeted because they were white!

The BBC aren't exactly known for their ultra right wing views so before you indulge in any more child like responses like the one above I suggest you watch the docu -drama "Three Girls" and the subsequent discussion program, both are available online!

 

I wasn't indulging, I was merely asking a question.  You know one of those things where you request information.  

 

Oh and its programme, not program that's such a childlike attempt of the spelling. We are British after all. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Watson said:

 

I wasn't indulging, I was merely asking a question.  You know one of those things where you request information.  

 

Oh and its programme, not program that's such a childlike attempt of the spelling. We are British after all. 

Lol you were being facetious and you know it !

Be very careful with your own spelling in the future, revenge is a very British trait lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, casbahowl said:

Lol you were being facetious and you know it !

Be very careful with your own spelling in the future, revenge is a very British trait lol

 

Okey Ill cheque mi spolling fro nah on

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, markowl said:

Racism isn't name calling ffs.

 

While ever people have this mindset, things will never change.

 

Racism isn’t name calling you are quite right 

 

Case closed Fernando 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Shezza said:

 

With you complaining about their slowness it was at least easy to think according to those lines, yes. 

 

You obviously jumped to the wrong conclusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Watson said:

 

My post wasn't meant to sound 'nasty'.

 

Further, at court, you are found guilty or not guilty, innocence doesn't come into it. 

Indeed. Look at the bloke who was found not guilty of rape but can't get his teaching job back. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Theboylangers said:

Indeed. Look at the bloke who was found not guilty of rape but can't get his teaching job back. 

 

That's a different issue though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Watson said:

 

That's a different issue though. 

Why? He was found not guilty but is clearly not innocent in the eyes of the relevant authorities. 

 

I was backing your point up with a case in point. I do agree that it is not related to this particular thread though so I'll leave it there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×