Jump to content

Player Ratings (vs Villareal)


Recommended Posts

Wildsmith 5 (Dawson 4)

Palmer 4 (Baker 6)

Lees 3 (Neilson 5)

Van Aken 4 (Thornily 4)

Pudil 6

Boyd 5 (Fox 5)

Bannan 6 (Reach 5)

Pelupessy 4 (Jones 2)

Hutchinson 6 (Matias 5)

Forestieri 6 (Joao 6)

Nuhiu 6 (Fletcher 5)

 

All in all, players didn't know where they were playing. No runners from midfield. Defensive 5 all at sea. Wildsmith is a good shot stopped but nothing else. Dawson looked rusty.

 

I think this probably sealed our relefation.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jowl said:

Wildsmith 5 (Dawson 4)

Palmer 4 (Baker 6)

Lees 3 (Neilson 5)

Van Aken 4 (Thornily 4)

Pudil 6

Boyd 5 (Fox 5)

Bannan 6 (Reach 5)

Pelupessy 4 (Jones 2)

Hutchinson 6 (Matias 5)

Forestieri 6 (Joao 6)

Nuhiu 6 (Fletcher 5)

 

All in all, players didn't know where they were playing. No runners from midfield. Defensive 5 all at sea. Wildsmith is a good shot stopped but nothing else. Dawson looked rusty.

 

I think this probably sealed our relefation.

you've rated  palmer a 4 but fox a 5 :picnic:

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wildsmith 6 (Dawson 6) - Neither had much to do

Palmer 5  (Baker 6) - Palmer extra point for goal

Lees 5 (Neilson 5)

Van Aken 4 (Thornily 4)

Pudil 6

Boyd 6 (Fox 5)

Bannan 6 (Reach 5)

Pelupessy 4 (Jones 2)

Hutchinson 6 (Matias 5)

Forestieri 6 (Joao 6)

Nuhiu 6 (Fletcher 5)

 

Have to say Jones was unbelievably bad.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, welsOwl74 said:

you've rated  palmer a 4 but fox a 5 :picnic:

 

 

He never even went to the game mate just talking rounduns

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, trotter said:

Wildsmith 6 (Dawson 6) - Neither had much to do

Palmer 5  (Baker 6) - Palmer extra point for goal

Lees 5 (Neilson 5)

Van Aken 4 (Thornily 4)

Pudil 6

Boyd 6 (Fox 5)

Bannan 6 (Reach 5)

Pelupessy 4 (Jones 2)

Hutchinson 6 (Matias 5)

Forestieri 6 (Joao 6)

Nuhiu 6 (Fletcher 5)

 

Have to say Jones was unbelievably bad.

 

Couldnt argue with any of that, Jones was awful, no one stood out at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jowl said:

Wildsmith 5 (Dawson 4)

Palmer 4 (Baker 6)

Lees 3 (Neilson 5)

Van Aken 4 (Thornily 4)

Pudil 6

Boyd 5 (Fox 5)

Bannan 6 (Reach 5)

Pelupessy 4 (Jones 2)

Hutchinson 6 (Matias 5)

Forestieri 6 (Joao 6)

Nuhiu 6 (Fletcher 5)

 

All in all, players didn't know where they were playing. No runners from midfield. Defensive 5 all at sea. Wildsmith is a good shot stopped but nothing else. Dawson looked rusty.

 

I think this probably sealed our relefation.

FFS!.

We haven't kicked a ball in anger and yet we are already relegated.

By the way, I though Pudil looked the weak link in to days game, that + we showed them far too much respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of you have had a go at this and almost got it right but I have to let you know that this is the right answer (or it might just be another person's subjective opinion, perhaps)

 

Wildsmith 5 (Dawson 5)

Palmer 5 (Baker 5)

Lees 6 (Neilson 4) (Lees was competent and mostly reliable I thought)

Van Aken 3 (Thornily 3) (both nearly got 4 but were just so error prone)

Pudil 6 (nearly 7)

Boyd 5 (Fox 4)

Bannan 5 (Reach 5)

Pelupessy 4 (Jones 2)

Hutchinson 5 (Matias 4)

Forestieri 6 (Joao 5)

Nuhiu 5 (Fletcher 6)

Edited by WOLS
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, McRightSide said:

I do enjoy the fact that this is clearly a comedy post designed at fishing and yet people have still been suckered in

The ratings are genuine.

 

The last sentance less so

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ll give ‘em all a 6.

Wasn’t there but watched three quarters of the second half on the internet until my wife said “I thought that you said the season started next week”

I tried to impress upon her the importance of being fully up to speed regarding the level of expectation that I should be prepared for , and the level of grumpyness that she should be prepared for....she didn’t buy it.

Who was number 3... he was an utter catastrophe...was it Jones...

Anyhow, you have all received my well thought out observations and it’s all fake news .

p.s. I’d love to play against our back three, four, five or what ever the hell it was supposed to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...