@owlstalk Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 Strong rumours that the Norwich City thing might actually be the real deal and that Jordan Rhodes might be off on a season long loan to Carrow Road Be interesting (if true) how much of his wages they're able to cover Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigash_swfc Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 James Maddison's 22m fee says Noriwch can pay his full wages or do one 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jfr142 Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 8 minutes ago, @owlstalk said: Strong rumours that the Norwich City thing might actually be the real deal and that Jordan Rhodes might be off on a season long loan to Carrow Road Be interesting (if true) how much of his wages they're able to cover Unless they cover all and a big loan fee. What's the point of risking him scoring 30 goals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 Finding some mugs who are flush with a premier league clubs cash was always the only way we’d get out of this particular mess. Come one Norwich, he’s got to be worth a punt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazowl55 Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 Recon the deal will mirror the one we done with Boro. Maybe more like 5 or 6m when the full transfer goes through though. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Tom Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 As above post - my gut feeling says DC would probably settle for chalking off year one transfer losses as a hard-learned lesson, and if he can break even over what would've been the next two seasonal payments back to Boro, then he'll probably take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthernOwl Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 24 minutes ago, jfr142 said: Unless they cover all and a big loan fee. What's the point of risking him scoring 30 goals. I guess the point is that their contribution to his wages could cover two signings for us on loan or on a free. That would help us more than Rhodes being sat on our bench for a year. Also any loan move will come with an option to buy so should he do well we'll then benefit financially. Sure Norwich might be a competitor next season but the reality is we are not in a financial position to hold onto a high earning player who we do not play simply to stop him playing for someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torryowl Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 25 minutes ago, jfr142 said: Unless they cover all and a big loan fee. What's the point of risking him scoring 30 goals. if you have a player you don't want /need you cant just keep him coz you fear he may do well elsewhere …...if he was to score 30 goals for a Norwich then it would be fair to assume they may want to keep him , we may even get our money back ……..there's absolutely nothing to lose by sending him out on loan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 If we get screwed on this deal too I'm gonna flounce big style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moz_Wednesday Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 You’d have to think loan fee plus the vast majority of his wages... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jfr142 Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 18 minutes ago, NorthernOwl said: I guess the point is that their contribution to his wages could cover two signings for us on loan or on a free. That would help us more than Rhodes being sat on our bench for a year. Also any loan move will come with an option to buy so should he do well we'll then benefit financially. Sure Norwich might be a competitor next season but the reality is we are not in a financial position to hold onto a high earning player who we do not play simply to stop him playing for someone else. Neither where wolves last season. Just sayin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBridgfordowl Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 56 minutes ago, jfr142 said: Unless they cover all and a big loan fee. What's the point of risking him scoring 30 goals. Not much of a risk though is it?! if anyone at the club thought him capable of that, he wouldn’t be going anywhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costello 77 Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 9 minutes ago, WBridgfordowl said: Not much of a risk though is it?! if anyone at the club thought him capable of that, he wouldn’t be going anywhere By your logic.. everybody would stay in the same job from school to retirement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBridgfordowl Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 Not sure his contract is quite that long Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marpals Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 (edited) Trouble is Norwich are in the driving seat if they are the only club interested in him, and to some extent have us over a barrel. They might be offering to pay only a quarter of his wages and at the end of the day if they are the only club interested they can offer what they want, especially if they are aware we need to move him on due to FFP or to be able to bring any new players of our own in. Edited June 24, 2018 by Marpals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted June 24, 2018 Author Share Posted June 24, 2018 Just now, Marpals said: Trouble is Norwich are in the driving seat if they are the only club interested in him, and to some extent have us over a barrel. They might be offering to pay only a quarter of his wages and the end of the day if they are the only club interested they can offer what they want, especially if they are aware we need to move him on due to FFP or to be able to bring any new players of our own in. Absolutely bang on Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woozie Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 There's already a thread on it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted June 24, 2018 Author Share Posted June 24, 2018 Sorry bro - didnt' see it Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torryowl Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 2 minutes ago, Marpals said: Trouble is Norwich are in the driving seat if they are the only club interested in him, and to some extent have us over a barrel. They might be offering to pay only a quarter of his wages and the end of the day if they are the only club interested they can offer what they want, especially if they are aware we need to move him on due to FFP or to be able to bring any new players of our own in. he's our player and if they want him it's up to us whether he goes or not …...i'd have thought that puts us in the driving seat . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
room0035 Posted June 24, 2018 Share Posted June 24, 2018 They sign Rhodes on loan from us but buy Marshall from Wolves. We need to remember Norwich will be our competition next season how will we feel if Rhodes fires them to the play off and we finish just outside. I am all for cutting costs and offloading players not needed but this could be a big mistake. Ala Winnall last season unless getting rid of Rhodes allows us to strengthen the defence and right wing with the savings on salary and maybe a loan fee. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now