Jump to content

BREAKING - George Hirst Gone


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Blue and white said:

What a sad sad day when 2 club legends play their part in doing the club over.

Hero to zero literally overnight.

being a hero is worth very little to some in comparison to being a millionaire.

ask yourself this, which would you rather be?

Edited by dnhc
addition to
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Geoffrey said:

Because the posters crying crocodile tears over morality are turning a blind eye?

 

No, you asked if that’s what we were talking about so I answered.

 

If you need it to be clearer...

 

No, that’s not what we were talking about.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hillsborough Mole said:

 

While its correct to compare the two - there is a huge difference in the scale of how much is involved.

 

But yes - non-existent taxi companies (however soon they may arrive) and drinks companies chucking £1m at us to circumvent FFP rules is another example of loopholes being used to exploit the system

 

It's not just the scale of it that differs, though.

 

Morally, a chairman using a loophole to pump a bit more of his cash into the club he owns in order to attempt to compete on an even footing with clubs whose bank balances have been artificially inflated by obscene parachute payments is hardly comparable to a club screwing another out of a development fee for a young player who came through their academy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sonny said:

It’s classic troll behaviour from Geoff. Same for months. Always trying to change the subject to just a couple of very narrow points. Won’t ever answer any questions. Very Tonto-esque actually.

Pretty much.

 

Once he's backed into a corner on one subject he just deflects onto another. 

 

So we as fans aren't allowed to be frustrated as to what's happened because of D-Taxis? Complete nonsense. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, areNOTwhatTHEYseem said:

 

It's not just the scale of it that differs, though.

 

Morally, a chairman using a loophole to pump a bit more of his cash into the club he owns in order to attempt to compete on an even footing with clubs whose bank balances have been artificially inflated by obscene parachute payments is hardly comparable to a club screwing another out of a development fee for a young player who came through their academy.

 

The only question that raises for me is, if the powers that be in football are prepared to just sit back and ignore such a dubious way of injecting funds into a club (which they clearly are) then why not just let the club owner put in an equivalent sum of money without having to go to the trouble of setting up non trading companies to do it? :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Hillsborough Mole
1 minute ago, casbahowl said:

Seems like it ........

while ever people like yourself are adding to it!

 

Ive never really understood posters complaining about people contributing to a threads longevity - while contributing to the threads longevity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...