dorian gray Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 hour ago, ramone said: Its not 3-5-2 though... its 5-3-2 and it doesn't work that's the danger, if you get your wingbacks pushed back you end up playing light in m/f, with a major amount of football played in your half of the field. you need wingbacks with an engine like sterland had, fit enough to run the opposition up and down the field till their lungs burst. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Hunt Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 We alternated between a 3 at the back to 4 today , I am baffled on what we are trying to achieve . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roy Of The Roasters Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 8 minutes ago, Bouncing Owl said: Regardless of whether we go 3-5-2, 4-4-2, 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1, I think everyone needs to realise this team isn’t very good. It lacks leadership, pace, physicality and more importantly good footballers. The team that was put out today is a lower end championship side. Today’s bench is league 1. Ain't that the truth...... 9 minutes ago, Bouncing Owl said: I think the reason Jos is going with 3-5-2, which I actually think is more 5-3-2 is that he doesn’t trust the players and he wants us to make us hard to break down. He wants 0-0’s and 1-0 wins. We went 4-3-3 away at Bristol city and got mullered. Exactly! Of course he can play other formations, but would they work? I honestly think 3-5-2 / 5-3-2 was about the best option with what we had available. If we'd held out for the win I think most of us would have accepted that. But it's easy to be wise with hindsight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now