Jeffjohnsonmyhero Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Spurs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffjohnsonmyhero Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 On 25/02/2018 at 11:02, malek said: It is travesty it took us this long to make him part of our first team squad, and have him signed on sh*tty one year deal. If we end up loosing him on cheap, we will have only ourselves to blame. Not we DC . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S36 OWL Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 On 25/02/2018 at 11:16, BarnsleyOwl96 said: Should be on the bench v Swansea or Bristol hirst I thought Bristol only had two teams , city and Rovers ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grez Bez Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 7 hours ago, BarnsleyOwl96 said: Just seen this , could just be liking the fact teams are after him , be a major shame to lose him I think young players should get some social media training when they sign professional terms! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrmason69 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Once again Claire is another victim of CC. And we pay the price. CC sent out a man of 21 on loan. Clearly at that age you've either got it or you never will have. CC didn't promote a single player from the reserves. Clare went out on loan and we were so incompetent that we didn't have a clause in the contract that would have prevented him from being cup tied. I blame cc for this. We should have tied Clare down to a new contract before we played him in the first team. Or at least we should have offered a good contract. We can pay no hopers like Rhodes 50 grand a week yet we won't pay for young talent. The Hirst mess is another example. Clare should have been promoted long ago. It's the clubs fault he's leaving. He's another player who we have treated like dirt. So it's our own fault he's leaving. Good luck to him. At a club like wednesday he can never flourish into a great player. As I said above gh. Clare needs to get as far away from Hillsborough as he can. Actions and consequences. Wednesday are the architects of their own loss and downfall Again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gurujuan Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 1 minute ago, Mrmason69 said: Once again Claire is another victim of CC. And we pay the price. CC sent out a man of 21 on loan. Clearly at that age you've either got it or you never will have. CC didn't promote a single player from the reserves. Clare went out on loan and we were so incompetent that we didn't have a clause in the contract that would have prevented him from being cup tied. I blame cc for this. We should have tied Clare down to a new contract before we played him in the first team. Or at least we should have offered a good contract. We can pay no hopers like Rhodes 50 grand a week yet we won't pay for young talent. The Hirst mess is another example. Clare should have been promoted long ago. It's the clubs fault he's leaving. He's another player who we have treated like dirt. So it's our own fault he's leaving. Good luck to him. At a club like wednesday he can never flourish into a great player. As I said above gh. Clare needs to get as far away from Hillsborough as he can. Actions and consequences. Wednesday are the architects of their own loss and downfall Again No, he’s a victim of the clubs policy of trying for short term success Putting all those championship has beens on big money contracts, whilst neglecting the younger players 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grez Bez Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 3 minutes ago, Mrmason69 said: Once again Claire is another victim of CC. And we pay the price. CC sent out a man of 21 on loan. Clearly at that age you've either got it or you never will have. CC didn't promote a single player from the reserves. Clare went out on loan and we were so incompetent that we didn't have a clause in the contract that would have prevented him from being cup tied. I blame cc for this. We should have tied Clare down to a new contract before we played him in the first team. Or at least we should have offered a good contract. We can pay no hopers like Rhodes 50 grand a week yet we won't pay for young talent. The Hirst mess is another example. Clare should have been promoted long ago. It's the clubs fault he's leaving. He's another player who we have treated like dirt. So it's our own fault he's leaving. Good luck to him. At a club like wednesday he can never flourish into a great player. As I said above gh. Clare needs to get as far away from Hillsborough as he can. Actions and consequences. Wednesday are the architects of their own loss and downfall Again If you learnt how to structure a paragraph properly then you could be a very good poster. Aside form the fact that your points are absolutely nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Almat Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Truly believe he's on his way. Can you blame him? What a clusterfuck this season has turned out to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mclovin Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 He got a loan to get first team experience and then eased into our first team, regardless of whether it was injuries that opened the door for him he has still been given a chance here. Nobody knew he was going to look so good after a couple of games and we have probably revised our contract offer accordingly. So i don’t think this is entirely the clubs fault for how this has turned out. But like it or not Clare has the upper hand in this and if we offer him decent terms you would like to think he will sign, but clearly his agents will be using every trick in the book Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dukeries Owl Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Would it be a crime to offer him a fifth of what Butterfield must be on? CONTEXT. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitcat Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 9 minutes ago, Mclovin said: He got a loan to get first team experience and then eased into our first team, regardless of whether it was injuries that opened the door for him he has still been given a chance here. Nobody knew he was going to look so good after a couple of games and we have probably revised our contract offer accordingly. So i don’t think this is entirely the clubs fault for how this has turned out. But like it or not Clare has the upper hand in this and if we offer him decent terms you would like to think he will sign, but clearly his agents will be using every trick in the book Nail. Head. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelowl Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 1 hour ago, gurujuan said: No, he’s a victim of the clubs policy of trying for short term success Putting all those championship has beens on big money contracts, whilst neglecting the younger players I have no idea whom to lay the blame with here for this specifically but DC has overseen a complete clusterfeck going all in on promotion we nearly did it, 'nearly' gets no cigar, especially as with all failed all in gambles there is an aftermath Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dukeries Owl Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 1 minute ago, steelowl said: I have no idea whom to lay the blame with here for this specifically but DC has overseen a complete clusterfeck going all in on promotion we nearly did it, 'nearly' gets no cigar, especially as with all failed all in gambles there is an aftermath We lumped it all on the 3.30 at Kempton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelowl Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Just now, The Dukeries Owl said: We lumped it all on the 3.30 at Kempton. Rhodes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitcat Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 (edited) I don't buy this neglecting the youngsters argument. We're no different to 99% of the footballing world in that respect. Yeah teams like Forest and our city rivals are different, but then they haven't had the transfer kitty we've had. It would be a totally different story if they had. Edited February 28, 2018 by Hitcat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akbuk Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Mrmason69 said: Once again Claire is another victim of CC. And we pay the price. CC sent out a man of 21 on loan. Clearly at that age you've either got it or you never will have. CC didn't promote a single player from the reserves. Clare went out on loan and we were so incompetent that we didn't have a clause in the contract that would have prevented him from being cup tied. I blame cc for this. We should have tied Clare down to a new contract before we played him in the first team. Or at least we should have offered a good contract. We can pay no hopers like Rhodes 50 grand a week yet we won't pay for young talent. The Hirst mess is another example. Clare should have been promoted long ago. It's the clubs fault he's leaving. He's another player who we have treated like dirt. So it's our own fault he's leaving. Good luck to him. At a club like wednesday he can never flourish into a great player. As I said above gh. Clare needs to get as far away from Hillsborough as he can. Actions and consequences. Wednesday are the architects of their own loss and downfall Again The agents are smarter than that ,nothing to do with CC ,Clare is being advised by his representatives ,I suppose we could always match his wage demands and hope that he really wants to stay on the other hand he may chose to go to spurs and become a multi-millionaire ,tough choice for the lad Edited February 28, 2018 by akbuk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dukeries Owl Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 8 minutes ago, steelowl said: Maybe the 3.30 at Kempton would have been a better bet as we wouldn't be paying for it for years to come. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now