Jump to content

Swansea fans think we have a tight budget


Recommended Posts

Guest Hillsborough Mole

Theyre right

 

FFP is very limiting at this level compared to clubs like Wolves who are hapy to risk it, or clubs with parachute payments

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hillsborough Mole said:

Theyre right

 

FFP is very limiting at this level compared to clubs like Wolves who are hapy to risk it, or clubs with parachute payments

To an extent, but we’ve spent millions of pounds. To say we have a ‘tight budget’ is silly. We bought Van Aken for £4M- if you look at teams like Ipswich,Brentford,Preston,Dingles- they’re entire squads didn’t cost that much. They have tight budgets, we do not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, lancashireowl said:

Might not be worth a thread but some fans are clearly naive and pay no attention at all. Also I wouldn’t say our squad is average by championship standards. ‘Cheap nodding dog too’ 

1A659F0B-91ED-43A6-80FE-803B9805A828.png

Good idea to go on the Swansea forum, eh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Hillsborough Mole
2 minutes ago, lancashireowl said:

To an extent, but we’ve spent millions of pounds. To say we have a ‘tight budget’ is silly. We bought Van Aken for £4M- if you look at teams like Ipswich,Brentford,Preston,Dingles- they’re entire squads didn’t cost that much. They have tight budgets, we do not.

 

I still dont believe we paid anything like £4m

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a "tight budget" relative to some championship clubs, and not to others.  It's not an unreasonable point being made by the Swansea fan.  Given available funding, we finished above par in each of the last two seasons.  This season we are below par and, worse, were in a tailspin, with all manner of distress signals

 

Enoch Powell observed that all political careers end in failure.  It might be said that is true of all managerial careers; or at least of most managerial tenders.

 

One things that's sure.  We shall be playing Swansea next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thewookieisdown said:

We have a "tight budget" relative to some championship clubs, and not to others.  It's not an unreasonable point being made by the Swansea fan.  Given available funding, we finished above par in each of the last two seasons.  This season we are below par and, worse, were in a tailspin, with all manner of distress signals

 

Enoch Powell observed that all political careers end in failure.  It might be said that is true of all managerial careers; or at least of most managerial tenders.

 

One things that's sure.  We shall be playing Swansea next season.

100%, they are dire and I can’t see Carlos keeping them up if he goes. We have a tight budget compared to Boro,Villa and Wolves- That’s it really. Maybe Derby or Reading but that’s debatable, regardless, we have a top 6 budget in this division and anything below that is underachieving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for FFP along with stadium capacity restrictions, I sometimes wonder if we have a permanent place on the naughty step. Maybe the betting scandal, The Hillsborough Disaster, the DiCanio/Alcock incident along with near bankruptcy have singled us out for special treatment, who knows?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, optimisticowl said:

As for FFP along with stadium capacity restrictions, I sometimes wonder if we have a permanent place on the naughty step. Maybe the betting scandal, The Hillsborough Disaster, the DiCanio/Alcock incident along with near bankruptcy have singled us out for special treatment, who knows?

 

 

What made you choose your avatar name ?

Edited by glynnb
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Swans fan is making a decent point, although I'd argue we have an above average Championship team. 

 

Compared with the divisions "big boys" we have had a fairly tight budget. We've splashed cash for the first time in 20 years, but we've still spent far less than Wolves, Boro, Villa, Fulham, Derby and Newcastle. We've spent about the same as Leeds and Norwich and only slightly more than Brighton, Bristol, Reading and QPR.

 

When you see that list, it shows we've done well (but not amazingly) to finish 6th and 4th. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hillsborough Mole said:

Theyre right

 

FFP is very limiting at this level compared to clubs like Wolves who are hapy to risk it, or clubs with parachute payments

How many other clubs have spent £10m on a striker?

 

Whilst not quite having the budget of Villa and Wolves - we’ve certainly spent far more than Cardiff, Bristol City, Pigs, Leeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...