swinners Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 (edited) Just a quick question. If Chansiri wants to plough money into the club but is not allowed and the finanial sustainability is in question, then why can the chairman not just buy up all of the spare seats (tickets) and all of the corporate boxes per match? Is there a rule about that? Edited December 3, 2017 by swinners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Brommers Posted December 3, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted December 3, 2017 He was going to but they were too expensive. 2 1 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Sl-OWL-ly Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 Better still, get rid of the coach, get rid of all the “ghost” players we have and buy some new exciting youngsters with the change, get exciting football back at Hillsborough and masses of fans queuing to see the excitment on the pitch... That’ll soon sort FFP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owlmanc Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 5 minutes ago, swinners said: Just a quick question. If Chansiri wants to plough money into the club but is not allowed and the finanial sustainability is in question, then why can the chairman not just buy up all of the spare seats (tickets) and all of the corporate boxes per match? Is there a rule about that? There must be ways round it. Why not buy all the seats and give them to youth groups such as scouts etc ... The money made on refreshments will be loads too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherlyegg Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 I thinks there's all sorts of shenanigans goes on, no doubt he will have a plan for this one, if not the other. I saw him in Star-bucks the other day talking to their financial advisor, whom have a similar problem with FFP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, owlmanc said: There must be ways round it. Why not buy all the seats and give them to youth groups such as scouts etc ... The money made on refreshments will be loads too How has the cash he’s injected so far been accounted for? If it’s largely as loans then maybe he doesn’t want to buy loads of seats etc because the club won’t owe him anything then. That will make it more of a risk for him . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Sl-OWL-ly Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 4 minutes ago, rickygoo said: How has the cash he’s injected so far been accounted for? If it’s largely as loans then maybe he doesn’t want to buy loads of seats etc because the club won’t owe him anything then. That will make it more of a risk for him . That’s the real concern we should all have.... If the debt and wage bill is put on WEDNESDAYS balance sheet we could be well fecked ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swinners Posted December 3, 2017 Author Share Posted December 3, 2017 9 minutes ago, rickygoo said: How has the cash he’s injected so far been accounted for? If it’s largely as loans then maybe he doesn’t want to buy loads of seats etc because the club won’t owe him anything then. That will make it more of a risk for him . But he said that he wanted to put more money in but wasn't allowed. He also said that if It was a case of him spending his money then that would be no problem. Wondered if there was a rule about him not being able to snap up the majority of the unsold seats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherlyegg Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 We will know in Jan how close to the wind we are, cos one thing is certain we need a couple of players at least. (assuming we will be striving for a top 6 finish) If it's reyt close and dodgy, it could be one reason CC is still here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
offalyowl Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 Why not just sponsor the stadium like a lot of other teams have done and if it meant we got promotion, I doubt there would be too many supporters angry about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swinners Posted December 3, 2017 Author Share Posted December 3, 2017 And. Where are his friends? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 Just now, swinners said: But he said that he wanted to put more money in but wasn't allowed. He also said that if It was a case of him spending his money then that would be no problem. Wondered if there was a rule about him not being able to snap up the majority of the unsold seats. But that might be him wanting to put cash in as loans which would be no good for FFP considerations which deals with losses not cash flow. To be honest he’s spunked enough cash on us so I wouldn’t blame him not wanting to risk more. It’s how it’s being spent that is the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Sl-OWL-ly Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 6 minutes ago, rickygoo said: But that might be him wanting to put cash in as loans which would be no good for FFP considerations which deals with losses not cash flow. To be honest he’s spunked enough cash on us so I wouldn’t blame him not wanting to risk more. It’s how it’s being spent that is the issue. Exactamundo ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nero Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 Why not create a couple of non existent firms to sponsor us? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarrowbyOwl Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 4 minutes ago, Warnocchio said: Why not create a couple of non existent firms to sponsor us? Don’t think that helps either. They would be classed as related parties Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S6 Lifelong Owl Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 13 minutes ago, HarrowbyOwl said: Don’t think that helps either. They would be classed as related parties Are elev8 and Dtaxis real companies then? ....in Thailand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarrowbyOwl Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, S6 Lifelong Owl said: Are elev8 and Dtaxis real companies then? ....in Thailand? Both incorporated here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owlmanc Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 1 hour ago, rickygoo said: How has the cash he’s injected so far been accounted for? If it’s largely as loans then maybe he doesn’t want to buy loads of seats etc because the club won’t owe him anything then. That will make it more of a risk for him . Forget about it being the owls. In business terms he's gotta build that brand back up with the consumer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S36 OWL Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 1 hour ago, sherlyegg said: I thinks there's all sorts of shenanigans goes on, no doubt he will have a plan for this one, if not the other.I saw him in Star-bucks the other day talking to their financial advisor, whom have a similar problem with FFP They just have a problem paying their Tax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S36 OWL Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) 42 minutes ago, HarrowbyOwl said: Don’t think that helps either. They would be classed as related parties A Taxi firm with no cars Edited December 4, 2017 by S36 OWL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now