Lee johnson

[Derick Mills]

He said that he had a good view of the Bannan penalty appeal  and Bannan went down to easy. Where the f--k was he stood last time I saw him he was in the tech area 

[torres]

He's right though 

[RichSheffWeds]

Yep he is right.

[Big Ron's Sovereign]

Went down easy or not, it was still a penalty.

[doubleo]

He had time to pull the trigger - seemed to be waiting for a tackle.

[Mr Farrell]

Leave whinging about not getting dubious pens to Carlos.

[Guest mrbluesky]

He went down like he’d been shot, wasn’t a penalty, let’s move on.

[Stoop]

He did right to try and win a penalty. If he’d have shot it’d have ended up on Penistone road like it usually does when he has a pop

[SiJ]

We didn’t deserve to win the game. 

[torryowl]

away manager says no , home manager says yes ..."television expert" says nailed on .......it was a pen as was  the one on Rhodes .

[BIG D]

I love how all the anti Carlos mob say it wasn’t a penalty

 

 

Meanwhile the people on TV who have seen the replays and actually know what they’re talking about say it was a definite penalty. 

 

 

Edited November 19, 2017 by BIG D

[barmyowl1212]

Simple rule. Contact in the box is a penalty simple as doesnt matter how soft. Ref should have booked Bannan if he thought he dived. 

 

[Bouncing Owl]

It wasn’t a penalty end of. Let’s be balanced about decisions either way.

[modboy]

i didnt think it was a penalty at the game (sat bang in line with it on the kop), looked like he was "looking for it" at the time, not watched the highlights as the match was bad enough the first time around 

Shame it was not Lee as he would have tucked away that chance instead.

 

Overall dont think we should be relying on refs to have our only shot on target

[cowl]

Didn't think it was a pen at the time, and for the same reasons that Johnson gave.

 

Having seen it back on replay a few times now I'd say it's a pen, even if he does seem to go to ground too easily.