mogbad Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Looks a definite push from Loovens to me. So no attempt to play the ball & therefore a red card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latemodelchild Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Having seen this and fletchers then I'm in the all refs are bent camp. 2 very similar incidents. Add it to last week's shocker and I'm struggling to stay sane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRADDO Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 That's a feckin disgrace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Jack Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 38 minutes ago, alanharper said: So the player should be banned next week for diving then and Loovens red rescinded? Russell through a dive in the box in the 1st minute, clear booking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0114 Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Looked a lazy tackle for Loovens. Should have just tried to pressure him. It's the 4th minute and you always risk a red card when bringing someone down 1 on 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwinowl Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 37 minutes ago, Great Big Galaa said: If that’s a pen, then Fletcher’s should’ve been. ^^^^^^^^. this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emerson Thome Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 It's a clear penalty and a red card. Double jeopardy rule is only if it is a genuine attempts to play the ball. I think Loovens was trying to bring him down outside the box but he was too late and it was inside the box. Fletcher should have had two penalties as well. One for the shove in the back in the first half. Second for the cross in the second half where he's trying to pull away to the back post and Wisdom is pulling him back by his shirt for 2-3 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommo_ Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 58 minutes ago, Libertine said: You’re all imagining things to try and peddle this myth that referees are somehow conspiring against us. Nah. They're just flipping useless altogether. Fletchers penalty claim was just as justified as Derbys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modboy Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Don't forget Westwood was lucky to stay on too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essix Blue Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 1 hour ago, Libertine said: You’re all imagining things to try and peddle this myth that referees are somehow conspiring against us. Spot on. It’s getting tiresome now. I could forgive Carlos the odd bit of bad luck, but ffs it’s gone beyond that now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pod9 Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Was at the game and first thoughts was Penalty when it happened. Red card harsh but looked a blatant push from where I was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debram Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 1 minute ago, Pod9 said: Was at the game and first thoughts was Penalty when it happened. Red card harsh but looked a blatant push from where I was. ok, whats your opinion on our denied penalties, hoop and fletch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pod9 Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Just now, debram said: ok, whats your opinion on our denied penalties, hoop and fletch Though Fletches was maybe although he should have done better with the initial chance. Once the chance was gone he went down which made it look like he was clutching abit I thought. If you mean when Davis tacked Hooper in the first half, it looked a clean challenge. Hooper hesitated and allowed him this to recover. There could have been 4 or 5 pens given today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debram Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 1 minute ago, Pod9 said: Though Fletches was maybe although he should have done better with the initial chance. Once the chance was gone he went down which made it look like he was clutching abit I thought. If you mean when Davis tacked Hooper in the first half, it looked a clean challenge. Hooper hesitated and allowed him this to recover. There could have been 4 or 5 pens given today. ok thanks for your honest opinion, sounds like we were not too harshly done by ,i was listening on radio sheff which sometimes can be misleading Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOOTIE AND THE SHIT TU Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 I watched it on Ifollow too Like the op said, clearly a dive Just a bloke, who used up all his luck in one go when he met his wife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eatonram Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Thought it was a pen, sending off harsh. Thought you should have had a pen for the shove but not the other. Not a great game, typical 10 v 11, thought you were decent Bannan MOM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manila_Owl Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Rubbish. Loovens did not act innocent. He knew he messed up. On the replay in the lead up to it, Lee and Bannan just glance at each other as neither knows who is playing in front of back 4. CB's just back off and off, leading to last ditch tackle. It's crap nervy football. They all looked scared of putting a tackle in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modboy Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Reaction of our coaching team said a lot. Carlos blanked him and other coach gave him a word or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevlad Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Loovens should have held the defensive line and let him run offside defo fo not a sending off - I could argue against the pen but I just can be arsed, fed up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nero Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 4 hours ago, Emerson Thome said: It's a clear penalty and a red card. Double jeopardy rule is only if it is a genuine attempts to play the ball. I think Loovens was trying to bring him down outside the box but he was too late and it was inside the box. Fletcher should have had two penalties as well. One for the shove in the back in the first half. Second for the cross in the second half where he's trying to pull away to the back post and Wisdom is pulling him back by his shirt for 2-3 seconds. What about the fxxking hand ball yellow card last week. He didn't stop a goal scoring opportunity. He stopped a fxxking real goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now