Guest Kagoshimaowl Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 Was it a penalty? I was watching on iFollow and I was already celebrating a forgone conclusion then to my horror I see Lee and Hooper get booked. Now, I know Lee sometimes 'goes to ground easily ' but I don't think he's a diver at all. Others opinions?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kagoshimaowl Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 (edited) Also, when Morais handled Rhodes shot that should have been a penalty and down to ten men. Yes Lee scored after that but they still had 11 men. I'm not sure this rule is fair... Edited October 14, 2017 by Kagoshimaowl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owlmanc Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 Just now, Kagoshimaowl said: Also, when Morais handled Rhodes shot that should have been a penalty and down to ten men. Yes Lee scored after that but they still had 11 men. I'm not sure this rule is fair... Think that's the new rule you can't be "done" twice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutch's biscuit knee Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 Lee is 100% not a diver but it wasn't a penalty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hirstys Salopettes Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 (edited) I think it's fair to say the ref was inept, possibly bent ... I think it's equally fair to say that's not why we've lost ... If you don't get your foot on the throat of a side bereft of quality or confidence, especially early doors, the referree is somewhat irrelevant. Sadly no tempo from the outset. Edited October 14, 2017 by Hirstys Salopettes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendaryswan Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 It was a pen all day,cant understand why the ref thinks hes dived,the contact was clear enough,Wheater? has his hands up expecting the inevitable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punkskaphil Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 6 minutes ago, owlmanc said: Think that's the new rule you can't be "done" twice The new rule only covers genuine attempts to play the ball legally, so a deliberate handball to prevent a goal or an obvious goal scoring opportunity is still a red card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s6 owl Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 3 minutes ago, punkskaphil said: The new rule only covers genuine attempts to play the ball legally, so a deliberate handball to prevent a goal or an obvious goal scoring opportunity is still a red card. Exactly it was an obvious case of cheating. What else can it be classed as? Disgusting decision by an utter parasite of a referee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owlmanc Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 21 minutes ago, Kagoshimaowl said: Also, when Morais handled Rhodes shot that should have been a penalty and down to ten men. Yes Lee scored after that but they still had 11 men. I'm not sure this rule is fair... The ref should have also made ameobi leave the fold after receiving on pith treatment... But he didn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shez owl Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 Two decisions by a referee who was apparently sacked a day before the season started! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopparberg Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 Not seen a reply of it, but Lee was in full flow after a decent move and looked a definite penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kagoshimaowl Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Just watched it again. Seems a stone wall penalty to me. Just don't get it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kagoshimaowl Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 13 hours ago, Hirstys Salopettes said: I think it's fair to say the ref was inept, possibly bent ... I think it's equally fair to say that's not why we've lost ... If you don't get your foot on the throat of a side bereft of quality or confidence, especially early doors, the referree is somewhat irrelevant. Sadly no tempo from the outset. I agree. We lost because our 10 million striker has three chances all inside the 6 yard box and misses all three! VVank goalkeeping and defending didn't help either! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modboy Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 That madine miss from two yards out , wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ron's Sovereign Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 I count 3 penalties/ red cards. Then add that to the blatant time wasting that was never punished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ron's Sovereign Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 5 minutes ago, Kagoshimaowl said: I agree. We lost because our 10 million striker has three chances all inside the 6 yard box and misses all three! VVank goalkeeping and defending didn't help either! One of the "misses" was due to basketball defending Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kagoshimaowl Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, Big Ron's Sovereign said: One of the "misses" was due to basketball defending Not including that one. Open goal at the back post, misses the target. Header when if he's gone with his foot he'd av scored and the one across the keeper from a Reach cross. Granted the last one was tough but he simply isn't good enough. Nuhiu would be getting murdered on here if he was missing chances like these! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No 2 is r nilsson Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Was a clear a penalty as you'll ever see. Agree that Rhodes should have scored the 3 clear chances he had and agree the defending was all over the place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emilianenko Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Bloke behind me said it was "a stone water" penalty 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davidioso Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 13 hours ago, owlmanc said: The ref should have also made ameobi leave the fold after receiving on pith treatment... But he didn't Apparently this rule has been tweaked. If the offending player is booked or sent off, the player fouled doesn't have to leave the field! Who knew...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now