northderbyshireowl Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 (edited) 16 minutes ago, NYCOWL said: Utah has changed you Just wise advice, could easily get in legal bother. Edited September 22, 2017 by northderbyshireowl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cognacbarnowl Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 1 hour ago, Fuzzy logics said: Move along, nothing to see here... Can I plus this 3 million times pleas ?? Piggy please ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gizowl Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 1 hour ago, Neal M said: Yep. And not ridiculous. Agree or not. Like or not. Evans had his conviction overturned. He is innocent of the crime for which he was charged. Direct references to any of the reported actions that night (especially references to or allegations of criminal culpability on Ched's part) are unacceptable. TLDR. Don't make specific allegations about his conduct that night. Vague, unspecific, nicknames such as "Ripper" are less of an issue. Specific accusations aren't on. Been found not guilty or having your conviction overturned is totally different from being innocent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheshowl Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 1 hour ago, Neal M said: Yep. And not ridiculous. Agree or not. Like or not. Evans had his conviction overturned. He is innocent of the crime for which he was charged. Direct references to any of the reported actions that night (especially references to or allegations of criminal culpability on Ched's part) are unacceptable. TLDR. Don't make specific allegations about his conduct that night. Vague, unspecific, nicknames such as "Ripper" are less of an issue. Specific accusations aren't on. I'll not be going down that road and getting into that debate but he had his conviction overturned correct, that does not mean he is "innocent" either in the eyes of the law or morally. The poster didn't refer to any criminal activity but as usual in the oversensitive over-censored world we live in someone has deemed the post offensive and deleted it. I think most people can decide for themselves what is right or wrong and can read a post they might not agree with without their eyes burning out of their skulls and demanding it to be deleted. No worries I'm sure some jobsworth will be along shortly to delete this too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neal M Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 10 minutes ago, Cheshowl said: I'll not be going down that road and getting into that debate but he had his conviction overturned correct, that does not mean he is "innocent" either in the eyes of the law or morally. The poster didn't refer to any criminal activity but as usual in the oversensitive over-censored world we live in someone has deemed the post offensive and deleted it. I think most people can decide for themselves what is right or wrong and can read a post they might not agree with without their eyes burning out of their skulls and demanding it to be deleted. No worries I'm sure some jobsworth will be along shortly to delete this too Calm down snowflake. This has nothing to do with over sensitivity and everything to do with protecting the site from the prospect (however slight you may think) of lawsuits. This is a thread in the public section of the biggest and most widely known SWFC forum on the internet. Things that are posted on here are very public and open to scrutiny. I quite like the site and don't want it or Neil put through unnecessary hassle. I move a lot of concrete on the QVC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owlandished Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 (edited) My wife reckons I could chop Leon's head off I swung my wee wee tail at him at a certain angle Of course I made my excuses and left, just in case she made me do it Leon was nowhere near the marital bed, obviously Edited September 23, 2017 by owlandished Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudentOwl Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 3 hours ago, Ash76 said: Actually that's not necessarily true, he was found guilty and then not guilty in a retrial. The way the retrial came about and how it was handled stinks to be honest but anyway it's is not enough to convince me of his innocence. Rightly or wrongly, the judgements of this courts of this land are not dictated by what you or I are and aren't convinced by. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah Owl Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 5 hours ago, NYCOWL said: Utah has changed you Nowt to do wi' me Jersey boy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AwokenGiant Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 8 hours ago, darra said: They'll come at us at a 100mph which I think is a style that suits us better. That's what Forest did and look what happened. I agree. We struggle when teams park the bus! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bronxowl Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 This is all a ploy by Wilderbeast. He wants Carlos and the players lulled into a (trouble at mill) scenario, just one of the tricks up his Warcockesque sleeve. They will have a fully fit team raring to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crookesowl Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 I heard they are all out of proper strikers for Sunday. Still a bit worried though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twolaptops Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 8 hours ago, Ash76 said: Actually that's not necessarily true, he was found guilty and then not guilty in a retrial. The way the retrial came about and how it was handled stinks to be honest but anyway it's is not enough to convince me of his innocence. Spot On ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spondon Owl Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Genuinely how is ched not innocent in the eyes of the law? Can someone explain that to Me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markowski77 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Innocent or not, Ched is still a massive t*%t and deserved everything he got and what he is going to get tomorrow if he plays. He proberbly thought he was the big man in town because he was a footballer, trying it on with every girl at twist and turn, knowing full well he has a long term girlfriend at home (who I personally think is an absolute joke, for staying with him) Ched took full advantage of his status as a footballer and a drunk girl, who did proberbly have some idea what was going on, never the less, he shouldn't have put himself in that position in the first place glad he got caught, it sent Wednesday up, I'm just hoping his career goes down the pan aswell, slimy piggy b*******d Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Snooty Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Innocent or not the fact remain. Chedwin went down on a young woman AFTER his mate had chucked his custard over the velcro triangle. That makes him a dirty snort beast. A snortbeast cleared of any wrong doing in the eyes of the law. But a dirtysnort beast all the same. Singing songs about him being a criminal maybe off limits. Singing about him being a dirty, swarthy type with a taste for stirring second hand gentlemens relish is fair game. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Bonvin Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 23 minutes ago, Markowski77 said: Innocent or not, Ched is still a massive t*%t and deserved everything he got and what he is going to get tomorrow if he plays. He proberbly thought he was the big man in town because he was a footballer, trying it on with every girl at twist and turn, knowing full well he has a long term girlfriend at home (who I personally think is an absolute joke, for staying with him) Ched took full advantage of his status as a footballer and a drunk girl, who did proberbly have some idea what was going on, never the less, he shouldn't have put himself in that position in the first place glad he got caught, it sent Wednesday up, I'm just hoping his career goes down the pan aswell, slimy piggy b*******d I think we ought to sing songs of joy and thanks to Mr Evans for his part in helping the porkers' season implode so spectacularly 5 years ago. Up there with the likes of Don Givens and his penalty taking abilities in my mind. Come on Wednesday!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Copthorneowl Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 18 minutes ago, Lord Snooty said: Innocent or not the fact remain. Chedwin went down on a young woman AFTER his mate had chucked his custard over the velcro triangle. That makes him a dirty snort beast. A snortbeast cleared of any wrong doing in the eyes of the law. But a dirtysnort beast all the same. Singing songs about him being a criminal maybe off limits. Singing about him being a dirty, swarthy type with a taste for stirring second hand gentlemens relish is fair game. Best get the butler to do the dirty singing, keeps you out of it and achieves the goal.....not that that's anything they'll be getting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOOTIE AND THE SHIT TU Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 1 hour ago, bronxowl said: This is all a ploy by Wilderbeast. He wants Carlos and the players lulled into a (trouble at mill) scenario, just one of the tricks up his Warcockesque sleeve. They will have a fully fit team raring to go. I certainly hope so I want them to bring their first eleven It won't save them Just a bloke, who used up all his luck in one go when he met his wife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtawnyowl Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, Spondon Owl said: Genuinely how is ched not innocent in the eyes of the law? Can someone explain that to Me? The way I look at it is that "not guilty" means that the prosecution have failed to prove his guilt. It doesn't, necessarily, mean that he is innocent. Edited September 23, 2017 by oldtawnyowl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 1 hour ago, oldtawnyowl said: The way I look at it is that "not guilty" means that the prosecution have failed to prove his guilt. It doesn't, necessarily, mean that he is innocent. But in the eyes of the law he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now