owlZfan84 Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 1 minute ago, OwlofOliveGrove said: £10m in this market, easily. Either they pay the going rate, have him on loan for a season or roger off completely. Reyt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OwlofOliveGrove Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Just now, owlZfan84 said: Reyt. Tongue in cheek pal. I'm not as daft as most clubs seem to be atm with transfer fees. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Claw Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 let him go, hes not happy since they sacked his dad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tudders Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Give him £10,000 per week 4 year deal with an increase in wages for 1st team appearances. Even if he doesn't progress to the first team during the 4 years it's less than £2M outlay. If he does progress we will get far more than that back if we have to sell him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BULGARIA Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 16 minutes ago, Ryan the owl said: You do realise just because they're interested it doesn't mean they'll get him? I'm interested in Michelle Keegan but I'm not getting her. Never say never mate. She might like a night out in sheff followed by a chip buttie supper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walt Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 31 minutes ago, room0035 said: Surely this cannot be this difficult for the club offer Hirst a few grand a week and sign him up to a 3 year deal. Then send him out on loan to Rotherham or Chessy for the season with a recall option at January if he is doing well. If not then sell him on to the highest bidder with a 25% sell on clause ala Stones from Barnsley to Everton. Even if his contract ran down based on how long he has been with us and his potential we could get £5m + in compensation. Is this true? Could we really expect to receive circa £5 million if he were to run his contract down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indoor Owl Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Ah yes, the Liverpool approach: No matter how many times you've been rebuffed, just keep asking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeonLeon Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Pointless move. He'll still end up out on loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kelliesleftnut Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 1 minute ago, NeonLeon said: Pointless move. He'll still end up out on loan. I don't think his bank manager will agree with that Neon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Claw Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 notts county loan deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daftpenguin Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Either way, I see him leaving before deadline day tomorrow, whether it be permanently or on loan after signing up again. I don't know how compensation works in terms of value but I assume £2m or so is more than we'd end up with at tribunal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
striker Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 At least it appears to set a minimum expectation at tribunal should he leave without signing a new contract. He needs to go out on loan, but we won't sanction without him signing a contract, fair enough. He is a couple of years away from being a first team player IMO, depending how his loan goes. He has zero chance while CC in charge, although hope that will change shortly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toppOwl Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 24 minutes ago, The Claw said: let him go, hes not happy since they sacked his dad They didn't sack his dad, he left by mutual consent over a conflict of interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deleted member Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 45 minutes ago, BIG D said: Getting a bit sick of him and his Father tbh. His Dad is merely putting the best interests of his son in front of the clubs. Nothing wrong with that - its what all good Fathers should do His son was offered a paltry deal by the club on a very long term contract. They rejected it. They are now being pressured to sign a deal by the club or his development will stop for the rest of this year. No wonder Hirsty walked out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beholder Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 I dont think playing hardball with an England under 18 free scoring son of a legend was a very good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Claw Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 2 minutes ago, Grandad said: His Dad is merely putting the best interests of his son in front of the clubs. Nothing wrong with that - its what all good Fathers should do His son was offered a paltry deal by the club on a very long term contract. They rejected it. They are now being pressured to sign a deal by the club or his development will stop for the rest of this year. No wonder Hirsty walked out. yep I think we all know that, thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG D Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 4 minutes ago, Grandad said: His Dad is merely putting the best interests of his son in front of the clubs. Nothing wrong with that - its what all good Fathers should do His son was offered a paltry deal by the club on a very long term contract. They rejected it. They are now being pressured to sign a deal by the club or his development will stop for the rest of this year. No wonder Hirsty walked out. It's up to them. Like I said I'm getting sick of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluesteel Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 If 2m had actually been offered I daresay he would be off. More like 300k! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deleted member Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 6 minutes ago, The Claw said: yep I think we all know that, thanks Clearly you don't or you wouldnt have said they sacked his dad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichieB Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 QPR sold a youngster, Josh Bowler, for a fee rising to £4.25m, and he hadn't made a single start for QPR and only 1 or 2 sub appearances if I'm not mistaken. So that's the sort of fee we should be looking at. Sick of clubs trying to have our pants down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now