Guest Deleted member Posted August 29, 2017 Share Posted August 29, 2017 (edited) Edited August 29, 2017 by Deleted member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costello 77 Posted August 29, 2017 Share Posted August 29, 2017 3 hours ago, DJMortimer said: It seems to me that the most stupid part of this proposed deal would not be selling Rhodes for a considerable loss, but buying him in the first place. Striker was a position we were already loaded in and it seems we simply could not afford that amount given the other much more urgent needs in the squad. Centre back has still not been sorted out five disappointing league games into the season, both full backs need upgrading and we could arguably do with another option in central midfield. Why didn't you post at the time that we signed Rhodes that you thought he was a terrible waste of money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ash76 Posted August 29, 2017 Share Posted August 29, 2017 It was a Radio Sheffield clip, also think he mentioned something when he was a guest on Biggs' show, i'll let you find it from there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OWLERTON GHOST Posted August 29, 2017 Share Posted August 29, 2017 8 minutes ago, Costello 77 said: Why didn't you post at the time that we signed Rhodes that you thought he was a terrible waste of money? I have it on good information that J Rhodes agent is /was a moderator on Owlstalk when DJ Mortimer posted his misgivings about said transfer will PM you my bank details for money transfer later DJ. ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJMortimer Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 2 hours ago, Costello 77 said: Why didn't you post at the time that we signed Rhodes that you thought he was a terrible waste of money? What purpose is served by a supercilious inference that it's an opinion I've only come to in hindsight? Doubts about the wisdom of the move (particularly relating to FFP rules) were hardly revolutionary and they have so far been confirmed in several respects. I apologise for not thinking to document my concerns at the time for future verification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now