Jump to content

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Muffin Owl said:

 

Why?

Because the money spent on dead wages is holding us back from being more proactive in the transfer market. 1 step back to take 2 steps forward. Every squad carries fat, but ours is like Bella Emberg. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 03/07/2017 at 19:11, AwokenGiant said:

I think Nixon is reliable enough, he called the Boyd signing and others. I think his ratio for being right far outweighs his wrong calls. That aside and more importantly who do we think the RB is who we are, supposedly, after? 

 

Can't get enthusiastic about anything we might do in this window It does appear now that it isn't a ruse, and we are perilously close to FFP limits Knowing that we still lacked key elements, how the hell was the signing of Rhodes sanctioned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, gurujuan said:

 

Can't get enthusiastic about anything we might do in this window It does appear now that it isn't a ruse, and we are perilously close to FFP limits Knowing that we still lacked key elements, how the hell was the signing of Rhodes sanctioned

 

It seems we decided to chuck everything in the Rhodes deal in the hope he'd help us get promoted but it's not worked out. Which may explain why there's rumours we're willing to let him leave already 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...