Jump to content

line up for friday


Recommended Posts

GK.Westwood

RB. Hunt 

LB. Fox 

CB. Lees 

CB. Loovens

RCM. Abdi 

DCM. Jones 

LCM. Bannan 

RW. McManaman 

CF. Rhodes 

LW. Forestieri 

 

Subs: Wildsmith, Sasso , Semedo, Reach, Wallace, Winnall, Hooper.

 

Thats how I'd go tonight personally, 4-3-3 system. Just have Semedo on the bench as cover for a defensive midfield option. However i fully expect Carlos to start Reach and Wallace.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not bothered about the line up either.

 

I think it's more important we get out of the habit of being so negative and afraid to lose. I'd like to see us ditch the 4-4-2 formation and go more attacking. Quicken the tempo and go at teams more. I'd prefer us to play 4-3-3 to get the best out of our better players and our attacking players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Coyt said:

GK.Westwood

RB. Hunt 

LB. Fox 

CB. Lees 

CB. Loovens

RCM. Abdi 

DCM. Jones 

LCM. Bannan 

RW. McManaman 

CF. Rhodes 

LW. Forestieri 

 

Subs: Wildsmith, Sasso , Semedo, Reach, Wallace, Winnall, Hooper.

 

Thats how I'd go tonight personally, 4-3-3 system. Just have Semedo on the bench as cover for a defensive midfield option. However i fully expect Carlos to start Reach and Wallace.

 

 

This ^

 

Or with Winnall instead of McManaman.

But I think 4-3-3 would suit us better than 4-4-2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not criticising anyone but if you think Rhodes up front on his own is a good idea then think again he had his worst season at Middlesbrough playing the lone striker averaging 1 in every 3 when he usually get around. 1 in 2 if not better.

 

Westwood

 

palmer

lees

loovens

Fox/reach

 

Mcmanaman

Jones

Abdi/Bannan

forestieri

 

winnall

rhodes 

 

i think hooper may still be injured/not fit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Milan Missing Marble said:

 

This ^

 

Or with Winnall instead of McManaman.

But I think 4-3-3 would suit us better than 4-4-2.

asking winnall to play RW would be completely different to asking him to play up front, different role. Now Rhodes is here I'm 110 sure 442 will be the formation

Edited by Crack pot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will probably be 

 

                   Westwoood

Palmer     Lees.    Loovens.    Fox

Wallace.   Bannan  Jones.    Reach.       Back 8

 

 

 

 

 

 

.                    Forestieri.        Trying to get involved   

 

 

 

 

.                    Winnall     Waiting for the crosses that don't come.

 

 

 

Would like to see. 

 

 

                     Westwood 

 

        Palmer. Lees. Loovens. Fox

 

                            Jones

                     Abdi         Bannan

 

  Macmanaman.              forestieri

 

                           Winnall

 

 

Quck forward line, Rhodes and Reach to come on when Winnall and Macmanaman have run them ragged, Rhodes hasn't played we don't want to break him before he gets going. 

 

We'll see UTO

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Milan Missing Marble said:

 

This ^

 

Or with Winnall instead of McManaman.

But I think 4-3-3 would suit us better than 4-4-2.

 

Winnall on the wing encapsulates the problem we now have  - too many players, how do you fit them in and get the best out of them.

 

He is a striker, not a winger but already is starting to look surplus to requirements with the arrival of Rhodes.

 

Its all a bit of a mess tbh and CC has a big job selecting a balanced side.

 

pressure very much on now..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/02/2017 at 21:01, York_Owl said:

Westwood

 

Hunt

Lees

Loovens

Fox

 

Abdi

jones

Bannan

 

Macmanaman

Rhodes

Forestieri

 

This, or the same players in a 4-2-3-1 formation.  But knowing Carlos I expect  Pudil, Palmer, Reach, Wallace and Winnall will start. Which when I type that out, it's funny that I could possibly be upset by it as they are good players too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, addedtime said:

Thought it was two games due to being sent off already?

 

I'm not 100% on Hutch. 

Just checked BBC sport & skysports & both say he's back available. 

But it seems most OT posters think differently. I guess we'll have to wait for team news. 

Either way we really need to pick up 3pts tonight 

WAWAW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Southie_Owl said:

 

This, or the same players in a 4-2-3-1 formation.  But knowing Carlos I expect  Pudil, Palmer, Reach, Wallace and Winnall will start. Which when I type that out, it's funny that I could possibly be upset by it as they are good players too

Agreed - so many options !! Lets hope whatever formation/team are chosen, it finally clicks & we batter em

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pazowl55 said:

To be honest whatever the line up is, all I am going to be seeing tonight is this-

 

                      Rhodes 

Rhodes Rhodes Rhodes Rhodes 

Rhodes Rhodes Rhodes Rhodes 

               Rhodes Rhodes 

 

lol

You and me both ha ha !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, j17tjp said:

 

I'm not 100% on Hutch. 

Just checked BBC sport & skysports & both say he's back available. 

But it seems most OT posters think differently. I guess we'll have to wait for team news. 

Either way we really need to pick up 3pts tonight 

WAWAW

Definitely out tonight. Check Wednesday website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, pazowl55 said:

To be honest whatever the line up is, all I am going to be seeing tonight is this-

 

                      Rhodes 

Rhodes Rhodes Rhodes Rhodes 

Rhodes Rhodes Rhodes Rhodes 

               Rhodes Rhodes 

 

lol

Surely number 9 should be David Hirst?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...