Jump to content

line up for friday


Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, OughtibridgeOwl said:

Think we should stop trying to show horn players into the team just for the sake of it. 

 

Id like to see Abdi in the team let him play be his creative self and set rhodes up with five goals on his debut before being subbed in the 92nd minute for a standing ovation(rhodes not abdi). I'd play Wallace over Mcmanaman. Simply for his goals in the last two games. 

 

Westwood

palmer or hunt. Loovens lee fox

wallace abdi jones forstieri

winnall rhodes

 

would like to see mcmanaman given a little bit longer than what he's been getting. Reach very versatile to cover a number of positions on the bench as well

 

0-5 rhodes 17,21,63,78,85

 

Are you not show horning Abdi WTF:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Internationowl said:

                     westwood

 

  reach         lees          loovens         fox

 

mcmanaman     bannan   jones     forestieri

 

                winnall       rhodes

 

wildsmith

palmer

pudil

wallace

abdi

hooper

big stiff

 

Why would you play Reach at right back doesn't make sense to me he should fight for his place on the left with FF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

                   Westwood

 

Palmer.    Loovens.       Lees.     Fox

 

                      Jones

 

             Bannan.          Wallace

 

                     Forestieri

 

             Winnall.         Rhodes 

 

subs

reach

buckley

abdi

pudil 

wildsmith

hooper  

mcmanaman

Edited by Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

             Westwood

 

Palmer.    Loovens.     Lees.      Fox 

 

                     Jones 

       Bannan                Wallace 

 

    Mcmanaman         Forestieri

 

                     Rhodes 

 

subs

Hooper

Winnall

Reach 

amd the rest 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Milan Missing Marble said:

When is Hutchinson back?

 

I'd like us to go 4-3-3 or have Forestieri wide left and to start Rhodes. He looks up for it in the training photos. Plus I'd bring in Abdi especially if we finally ditch 4-4-2.

Out for another game 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rogers said:

Out for another game 

 

Cheers fella, was unsure.

 

Jones is probably the natural replacement for Hutchinson?

 

Personally I'd like to see us play 4-3-3 or some variation of that formation. Maybe Abdi, Jones and Bannan in midfield with a front three of Winnall, Rhodes and Forestieri or even have two wide players in the front three such as McManaman and Forestieri either side of Rhodes?

 

In my opinion it's the 4-4-2 formation as well as the negative style of play, which is holding us back at present.

Edited by Milan Missing Marble
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A more attacking line up and tactics required now we've got Rhodes. We need to create chances a plenty for this lad!

 

            Westwood

Palmer  Lees  Loovens  Fox

              Bannan

McManaman          Forestieri

                Abdi

Rhodes                   Winnall

 

4-4-2 with the midfield 4 being a diamond

 

Subs.

 

Wildsmith

Reach

Jones

Pudil

Hooper

Wallace

Hunt

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

---------------------Westwood------------------------

Hunt-----------Lees----------Loovens------------Fox

-----------------Jones-------Bannan------------------

Wallace---------------Reach----------------Forestieri

-----------------------Winnall---------------------------

 

Subs:

Wildsmith

Palmer

Sasso

Abdi

McManaman

Rhodes

Nuhiu

 

Can't see Carlos throwing Rhodes straight in. They'll only have had one full session since the Bristol game, so I think they'll stick him on the bench.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ere carlos old love lets go attacking

 

             westwood                                     

 

   reach   lees   loovens   fox

 

   wallace    hooper forestieri

 

   winnall   Rhodes   Fletcher

 

 

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope Carlos doesn't use the excuse of playing 2 games in 3 days when we had 11 days rest against Bristol who only had 3 days rest.

 

   

        

            Westwood

Palmer Lees Loovens Fox

Macca Jones Bannan Wallace

        Rhodes Forestieri 

 

That's what I'd play. I think if we moved Wallace over to his natural left for the first time under Carlos then he will be in a better position to put crosses in for Rhodes. Macca will have the pace to open up a defence but again I've never seen Carlos want to do that either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Copthorneowl

We've got so many really tasty options but I think it's important that if we have players of top quality on loan whilst  at the same time we are struggling to dominate and beat mediocre teams we must give them a chance.

 

Buckley will almost certainly be going back from whence he came and it could be argued he's not set the world alight having had little or no chance.

 

On the other hand we lack wide quality and pace and now have two new strikers who must be fed. Therefore we:- 

 

Absolutely must pick Mcmanaman imo otherwise waste of time him being here, and Abdi for that matter we are playing Wigan not Chelsea so shouldn't be any risk whatsoever. Small cameos by CM should now gain him the first 80 mins not last 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wwood

 

Hunt lees loovy fox

 

Macca bannan jones reach

 

             Fessi rhodes

 

Crosses needed for rhodes

 

Winnall for fox or reach and abdi for jones/fox poss subs

 

Attack from start only playing sideways tappy ball if we're winning by 2

Edited by Ash77
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to see winnall and rhodes link together as much as everyone else but it wont happen yet because unless hoopers back he will only have nuhiu on the bench .

 

westy

-

Hunt

lees

Loovens

Fox

-

Wallace

Bannan

Jones

Reach

-

Winnall

Forestieri

 

Been to predictable this year really need 3 points so hopefully all the signings wigan made have unsettled them abit more 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, akbuk said:

Why would you play Reach at right back doesn't make sense to me he should fight for his place on the left with FF

I feel the reaction to my line up is wholely unfair. Just had to check if I'd suggested adam reach play at right back or if I'd said I was going to rub my balls vigorously on a cheese grater, then submerge them into a cup containg sizzling hot battery acid, vinegar, lime juice and bleach.

It was the reach thing.

F*** you Internet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...