Ellis Rimmer 6,290 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 17 minutes ago, Bluey9 said: Mr Rhodes doesn't seem to be getting much game time and they want 11 mill for him Premiership Link to post Share on other sites
clampyowl 101 Posted January 21, 2017 Author Share Posted January 21, 2017 I actually can't believe what im reading, people saying reach was mom last night is actually unbelievable, and im also sick of this, he will come good crap, we r trying to get promoted now, he's not good enough, end off chat Link to post Share on other sites
Melv 36 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 One of the best players for us in this match Link to post Share on other sites
james o connor 11,088 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 28 minutes ago, clampyowl said: tried being patient with him, don't care how much he cost, he passes backwards (and sometimes to the opposition) every time he gets the ball, we can't break quickly with him in the team, he literally is one of the worst signings ive seen at.Hillsborough in my.35 years of watching em, we have serious potential to be a good side,.but its.time to bite The bullet and admit we've bought a stinker here, anybody who see's him as a good player is more optimistic than ill.ever be Are you gonna drop that village idiot forestieri then as he was ten times. No ? Exactly Link to post Share on other sites
ANDY 12,252 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Put some quality crosses in. Shame no one was on the end of them. Link to post Share on other sites
leedsbornowl 78 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 REACH played well last night,are you just looking for a scapegoat?????? Link to post Share on other sites
Bluey9 542 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 21 minutes ago, Ellis Rimmer said: Premiership They were when we signed Reach Link to post Share on other sites
akbuk 962 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 It was a good game between two top teams,had the penalty gone we probably would have won Link to post Share on other sites
davey_wells 1,576 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 He was quality last night - and if McManaman isnt going to get a game I'd play him on the right with FF on the left. Don't get this Morgan Fox thing too - we sign him, yet Pudil still gets a game meaning Reach is the cover, meaning he gets shunted back to full back as soon as Pudil inevitably gets dragged off or injured? He's never going to get a proper chance to make his mark. Link to post Share on other sites
Bluesteel 15,418 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 There is plenty to improve with him. But I think we'd miss him if he was dropped, big lad, lots of energy and always willing. He looks more confident at taking a shot now and hopefully the rest will follow. Link to post Share on other sites
smithyswfc 69 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 55 minutes ago, clampyowl said: tried being patient with him, don't care how much he cost, he passes backwards (and sometimes to the opposition) every time he gets the ball, we can't break quickly with him in the team, he literally is one of the worst signings ive seen at.Hillsborough in my.35 years of watching em, we have serious potential to be a good side,.but its.time to bite The bullet and admit we've bought a stinker here, anybody who see's him as a good player is more optimistic than ill.ever be I've not been his biggest fan so far but last night I think he had a good game. He ran at their defense and was putting balls in the box, can't really ask for much more from a winger. Link to post Share on other sites
Beholder 10,421 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Reach was our standout player you clown. Link to post Share on other sites
Garry Powell 297 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Thought he had a decent game myself. Did give it away cheaply at times as did others .We cause our own problems overplaying in the wrong areas and i also thought that last season. Sometimes its right to just clear your lines. Link to post Share on other sites
bedfordowl 833 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Thought Reach had a good game last night I like him. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RocketOwl Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Better than Pudil at left back. Link to post Share on other sites
Ironman 873 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Occasionally puts a half decent ball in if he gets in space, but appears to be like bambi on ice if an opposition player comes within 5 yards of him, panics and ends up going backwards or giving it away sloppily. Shooting is poor and neshes tackles. maybe it's our negative style limiting him, but I think he's been very poor so far. Doesn't seem confident enough to be a left winger or strong enough to be a left back. Link to post Share on other sites
KernowOwl 612 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Reach needs to be placed on the left wing and let him develop as a winger and not placed at left back every other game. If CC wanted a 5m left back then the club shoulda brought a 5m left back. Our strikers need service from the wings. Reach can cross a good ball. Give him time in one position. Link to post Share on other sites
WatfordOwl 7,121 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Some people will just slate a player because of who he is and only ever comment on the things they do wrong in a game. It then starts to transmit from the terraces onto the pitch and the player starts getting hounded. Way to go. Seem to remember similar murmurings about Antonio and he's ended up being an horrific player hasn't he? Link to post Share on other sites
dave110285 24 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 For me he started to play better when he got put at back.doesnt seem to want to attack players when going forward.is probably the softest player I've ever seen. Link to post Share on other sites
Gingernuts 251 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 I just wonder how many of our players who are being continually slated every week would play much better if we had a tactical system that actually worked, and was comfortable to the players. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now