No Uniform Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Was completely perplexed when we stayed with 2 up front and only 3 in midfield after the sending off. Weird choice by Carvalhal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_W_F_C Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Had no chance to re-organise after the red and then left with no choice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Snooty Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Sign of a positive coach still wanting to attack. Weird maybe to some. But something to be applauded in my eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Uniform Posted February 20, 2016 Author Share Posted February 20, 2016 Had no chance to re-organise after the red and then left with no choice 7 minutes after and we made the sub of nuhiu for Joao in the meantime. We were never dominating the middle field and their wingers/wingback were bombing in. It was a bad choice imho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmowl Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 I thought it was a fair call. We have wanted him to be positive away, and he was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owls2k Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Was completely perplexed when we stayed with 2 up front and only 3 in midfield after the sending off. Weird choice by Carvalhal. Carlos can't win them all, his tactical changes/decisions late in games has won us so many points this season(Brimingham A, Hudders H for example), it's great to have a positive coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victorturner Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Even weirder to play Sasso, when we were told Hutch was fit ; and Turner may not be fully fit-he rarely will be-but he was only a sub. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEnchanter Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Even weirder to play Sasso, when we were told Hutch was fit ; and Turner may not be fully fit-he rarely will be-but he was only a sub. Why? Because we have 3 games in 6 days. Hutch will most likely be playing against QPR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BaRmY OwLs Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Damed if you do damed if you don't. I applaud the managers decision. Please correct any spelling mistakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BaRmY OwLs Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Damed if you do damed if you don't. I applaud the managers decision. Please correct any spelling mistakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VictoryBell Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 It's good. It shows commendable and optimistic ambition and I applaud it. We didn't build the greatest empire the world has ever known by running away Mind you, we did reorganise, defensively, famously at Rorke's Drift! But, then again, today we weren't facing "Zulus! Faarsands of 'em!" Point is that we Brits regrouped after Isandlwana and won the war and Wednesday will do the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S36 OWL Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Most managers park the bus after they go down to ten men . Credit to Carlos for being positive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozzy85 Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Sign of a positive coach still wanting to attack. Weird maybe to some. But something to be applauded in my eyes. Yep no point sitting back. May had we'll have tried to get at least a point back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorian gray Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Sign of a positive coach still wanting to attack. Weird maybe to some. But something to be applauded in my eyes. if the times right, you have to trust him to go for it... we lost a point gambling for 3... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradowl Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Agree however he was attack minded with 10 men but never is with 11 @away The 10 men had Preston hanging on at end so much so they were trying to keep ball in corner and took an age over 3 subs coming on near end, when first sub came on he knew another was about to come and told player who was going to be replaced to go to far side of pitch furthest away from dugouts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorian gray Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 It's good. It shows commendable and optimistic ambition and I applaud it. We didn't build the greatest empire the world has ever known by running away Mind you, we did reorganise, defensively, famously at Rorke's Drift! But, then again, today we weren't facing "Zulus! Faarsands of 'em!" Point is that we Brits regrouped after Isandlwana and won the war and Wednesday will do the same gatling guns, and fixed position cannons at the ready... cavalry awaiting 'pursuit'... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now