EcclesallOwl Posted July 21, 2014 Author Share Posted July 21, 2014 He said earlier this year? Oh right Thought it was just another post trying to stir I'd like to see a legit, credible story that's come out SINCE Milan decided to make the sale. Anything before then will have been picked up by Milan and his team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobayashi Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 You got a link to where the Baghlan group defaulted on $18M of LOAN PAYMENTS please. google ISIN: XS0780263165 look for the csx debt security listing site and 2014 announcements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
db_leeds_owl Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/en/eu/?rpqSearch=NO&pageNav=No&searchField=Entity&searchText=Baghlan+group&find.x=8&find.y=10 S&P don't seem to offer a rating for Baghlan Group at all. I'm probably not searching correctly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Batman Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 If only Milan had checked Google instead of fannying about with whatever inadequate checks he did! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earlsfieldowl Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Football league ffs football league Sorry Cornelius - my mistake! 90% of what is on this thread is pure speculation - 'I read' or 'the gist' etc. All nonsense. Unless it's an official statement from the club, it's to be taken with a pinch of salt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M Royds Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 trotterNo he's not. Been posting on here for years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KernowOwl Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Owlstalk has some great researchers, I don't know what you lot for a living but you're wasted on here. If HM company was running dry, how come we are now soponsed by them. And if his business was on it's last legs, he would still have his personal wealth. What did people do before the internet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shandypants Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 No mate. Not wrong at all. There used to be a poster called Kayser Soze/Kaiser Soze/etc. And your post just put in mind of him. Wondering if he's the sort that changes their name. Or have I been whooshed...in which case, I didn't mean anything I wrote above. You've not been whooshed mate. It's me not thinking right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichieB Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Football league ffs football league Sorry Cornelius - my mistake! 90% of what is on this thread is pure speculation - 'I read' or 'the gist' etc. All nonsense. Unless it's an official statement from the club, it's to be taken with a pinch of salt! 90% is speculation, including your brilliant theory that because our takeover hasn't been ratified then it MUST be something to do with the Lens situation, because it can't be a 'coincidence' like you say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capetownowl Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 HM doesn't want to put the €10mil in upfront on top of the other tens of millions he has already put in. Martel is in charge of submitting a revised budget and has failed to do so. Even without the €10mil, Lens' budget is good enough for promotion to be allowed. Is that a fair assessment of what's happened so far? The football league require a business plan upfront showing how the club will survive, it doesn't require vast amounts of money to be sat in the clubs bank account. I'm not really worried, to be honest, the Lens farce seems like an admin wee wee tail up and the impression I get of HM is that he is quite hands off - I'd be surprised if he is to blame for the incompetence there. He should probably starting looking for a new chairman, though. I dont know the financial implications of Lens not being promoted are. But I would suggest that it will be cheaper and easier to get a disgraced former idolised chairman out of a 2nd division club than a newly promoted club. Lens can then push for promotion again with a stable management all singing the same tune. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M Royds Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 =================== A Z E R B A I J A N =================== BAGHLAN GROUP: Fitch Assigns 'B-' Long-Term Issuer Default Rating ----------------------------------------------------------------- Fitch Ratings has assigned Baghlan Group FZCO a Long-term foreign currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of 'B-'. The Outlook is Positive. Baghlan is a privately owned, diversified Azerbaijani corporate benefiting from the expected structural growth of the country through its transport services, construction and oil & gas activities. Although moderately leveraged for the rating category recent investments into start-up oil and gas assets have increased the debt quantum. The agency expects funds from operations (FFO) gross leverage to remain below 2.5x into FY13. Fitch expects on-going stability from its transport services business to offset lumpy cash flow generation from its construction segment. The oil and gas segment over FY13 & FY14 is expected to be a modest drain on cash flows. However, the potential for this unit to outperform and up-stream dividends to the group - indicative of standalone strength - is a potential positive rating event. KEY RATING DRIVERS Diversified Operating Segments: The operating risk profile benefits from its diversified nature, although the concentration on large contracts is a weak point. Transport and logistics services benefit from strong domestic market share, recurrent cash flow and privileged contracts with government bodies. Construction is primarily focused on one large civil works contract with a few more contracts in the order book coming on-stream over the next few years. Although this business risk exhibits a higher risk with volatile working capital movements and fragmented market share, profit margins and growth prospects are strong. Oil and gas operations are in a run-up phase and still required financial support from the group, although expected to be cash flow positive from FY15 onwards. Stable Transport Services Unit: As the leading freight agent in Azerbaijan this operating segment requires minimal debt funding and has a solid track record of generating reasonable free cash flow (FCF) for the rest of the group to grow. This stability stems from Baghlan's leading position as the key freight agent for Azerbaijani Railways selling on its behalf around 60% of all freight volume through the Azerbaijani railway network. The unit has high barriers to entry with Baghlan benefiting from an exclusive medium term contract with Azerbaijani Railways. Real Estate Divestments: Strong FY13 expected FCF generation is dependent on the disposal of this portfolio of primarily residential, multi-purpose units in central Baku. The positive impact on FCF of around AZN60m from these divestitures would aid de-leveraging, although not required to maintain consolidated FFO gross leverage below 2.5x for FY13. Baghlan is currently in negotiations with investors and banks to sell these units in block sales. Volatile Working Capital Movements: Solid P&L profits posted in recent years have not fully converted into cash flow. Negative working capital outflows during 2011 and 2012 have led Baghlan to fund a working capital requirement of around AZN181m as at FY12 (inventory plus current receivables less current payables). Although working capital is likely to become positive in 2013 and 2014 it is closely linked to divesting real estate assets, receiving payment from deferred consideration following the sale of a JV interest (AISBG) and successful execution of their construction contracts. Receivables risk is largely contained with the majority of receivables linked to Azerbaijani state authorities. Reduced Bank Debt Dependency: As typically for a private Azerbaijani issuer, access to long term bank funding is constrained by the relatively under- developed banking market. Positively, Baghlan used the international debt markets issuing a secured USD150m note in 2012 to fund the increased stake in their existing oil and gas business. Baghlan continues to refinance its bank debt largely with the International Bank of Azerbaijan ('BB'/Stable) that has in recent years shown solid support for the domestic non-oil sector. RATING SENSITIVITIES: Positive: Future developments that could lead to positive rating actions include: - Improved operating risk profile with reduced concentration on large single contracts. - Positive working capital generation and successful divestment of real estate assets. - Extension of existing debt maturities and diversifying sources of funding. - Sustainable financial metrics with Fitch adjusted FFO gross leverage below 3.0x and FFO gross interest cover above 4.0x. - Oil and gas activities to be self-sufficient and generate sustainable FCF to upstream dividends. Negative: Future developments that could lead to negative rating action include: - Continued working capital outflows and increased requirement to use local bank funding. - Failure to renew key contracts or loss of licenses in the Transport segment. - Oil and gas activities to drain material cash flow from the overall group and /or an underperformance on the oil and gas segment. BAGHLAN GROUP: S&P Assigns 'B' Corp. Rating; Outlook Stable ----------------------------------------------------------- Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its 'B' long-term corporate credit rating to Azerbaijan-based diversified company Baghlan Group FZCO. The outlook is stable. The rating reflects S&P's assessment of Baghlan's business risk as vulnerable and its financial risk as aggressive. Baghlan generated Azerbaijan manat (AZN) 144 million (about EUR137 million) in adjusted EBITDA in 2012. It operates in five key segments: freight forwarding, public transportation, construction project management, equipment trading, and oil and gas. The rating is constrained by Baghlan's position as a small player that relies heavily on a limited number of large contracts. These are mainly in road construction for the government-related Azeryolservice and in freight forwarding, where the company enjoys a hefty 50% discount from Azerbaijan Railways thanks to accumulating large transportation volumes. Any changes to these contracts could significantly affect Baghlan's profits or cash flow, in S&P's view. Baghlan also faces large working capital fluctuations (notably related to the road construction project), which may pressure cash flows and liquidity, despite some cushioning from its back-to-back structuring with suppliers. Lastly, Baghlan is undertaking a new oil and gas project that will require sizable capital expenditures and may be subject to execution risks. The company has a concentrated shareholder structure, and S&P believes that it may be subject to key man risk, as the company's business may be exposed to the position of its core shareholder, Mr.Hafiz Mammadov, in Azerbaijan's business and political context. In addition, S&P considers that Baghlan is subject to the risks of doing business in Azerbaijan, where it operates its key activities. On the upside, Baghlan benefits from diversification by business segment and favorable profitability levels under its existing contracts. Azerbaijan's developing business environment currently creates barriers to entry to Baghlan's key niche markets, although this could change in the future. Baghlan's debt of AZN233 million on Dec. 31, 2012, is quite manageable. In S&P's base-case scenario, it assumes that the company will maintain its generally prudent approach to leverage. Baghlan's invests in its oil and gas project via a production sharing agreement, which helps it to share capital expenditures with its partners and enables it to recover investments relatively quickly when production increases are achieved. The company's projects in other segments require only small maintenance capital expenditures. The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that Baghlan will maintain manageable liquidity over the next few years, and avoid any further large working capital outlays or any deterioration in the key terms of its largest contracts. S&P expects Baghlan to maintain healthy headroom under the covenant that limits its ratio of debt to EBITDA at 2.5x. S&P has not factored any major debt-financed acquisitions into its base-case scenario. S&P could consider lowering the rating on Baghlan if it observed a squeeze on liquidity, a significant negative change in the profitability of key contracts, or the company made large debt- financed acquisitions. S&P has not factored these possibilities into its base-case scenario, however. In S&P's view, rating upside is limited in the short to medium term because of the company's limited size and the inherent high volatility in its business. MUGANBANK: S&P Affirms 'B-/C' Counterparty Ratings; Outlook Pos. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said it revised its outlook on Azerbaijan's Muganbank to positive from stable. At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'B-/C' long- and short-term counterparty credit ratings on the bank. The outlook revision reflects S&P's view that the recent capital increase will strengthen Muganbank's balance sheet and provide the bank with the capacity to increase its competitive position in the domestic market. If well managed, this could improve the bank's future core profitability, which was fairly weak in 2012. Muganbank has recently benefited from an additional capital increase of Azerbaijan manat (AZN) 10 million. S&P expects the bank to gradually become one of Azerbaijan's top 10 banks in terms of loans and assets, and even higher in the ranking in terms of net profit. S&P notes that the bank has successfully developed relationships with international financial institutions and government funds, attracting less expensive funding facilities and therefore improving its franchise and, potentially, its profitability ratios. S&P's affirmation of its 'C' short-term rating reflects the inherent risks for a small bank with an undiversified business model in a high risk country, and certain liquidity risks. "We base our ratings on Muganbank on a 'bb-' anchor for banks operating predominantly in Azerbaijan, and our view of the bank's "weak" business position, "adequate" capital and earnings, "moderate" risk position, "average" funding, "adequate" liquidity, and "low systemic importance" in Azerbaijan, as our criteria define the terms," S&P noted. "We view the bank's business position as weak because of its small market share, persistent strategic uncertainties, and very compact management team that is in danger of placing too much importance on key individuals. However, we think there is potential for the bank's business position to improve. The bank is among Azerbaijan's top 15 financial institutions and had about 285 million AZN in assets on Dec. 31, 2012. It mostly lends to small and medium businesses. We note that the bank's owners, who are Azeri businessmen, are now looking to sell a stake to external foreign investors, which adds some uncertainty regarding the bank's future development. If any sale happens, we will review the bank and may take a rating action based on the new owner's strategic priorities," S&P added. S&P raised its assessment of the bank's capital and earnings to "adequate" following the AZN 10 million cash injection at the end of 2012. S&P thinks that the bank's earnings are going to recover after one-off provisioning needs incurred in 2012 that influenced the bottom line results. The bank's trends in net interest margin and fee and commission income are positive, in S&P's view. The positive outlook reflects S&P's expectation that the bank will continue to grow in its current market niche, and that its core banking profitability will improve gradually and give it an enhanced buffer to cushion credit costs. S&P might consider a positive rating action if it saw that the bank's market share was increasing enough to push it into the top 10 in terms of loans and assets without harming its financial profile, notably its asset quality indicators. S&P might revise the outlook back to stable if asset quality deteriorated sharply, with non-performing loans reaching double digits, although this is not S&P's base-case expectation. S&P could also consider a negative rating action if the funding profile deteriorated significantly, leading to depressed liquidity and loss of confidence among some large depositors. Holy smoke, that's sensational. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sotrab Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 I don't think people are blaming Mammadov. But he owns that club and it's happened on his watch. If a similar thing happened here then Milan would get lynched. Hence why people are looking at Mammadov and wondering what the hell is going on. I'd say that's reasonable as oppose to a 'flounce' What's this about his watch? He doesn't run the club, simply the majority shareholder so no it hasn't happened on his watch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nethertonowl Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 OK, things I dont understnad here, please can anyone help? Whats the connection between, Bahglan and Land of fire?,would have thought that Land of Fire was the country/Government , therefore our sponsor money comes form them, via HM influence and not his own money?, if I am right , causes me more concern he may be bust. Secondly, Why has he paid , over the odds for us?, we aint valued at £40 m, is this jsut a way to get money out of Azer?, The arrest cliams, what if he wasnt arrested, but refused the right to leave the country, ?, Also if money shortage wasnt a worry , MM would have got the underwater mobile out and said chill , I have been paid, he aint skint? must admit, More concerned with every day.Think MM may have meet his match, , Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigrbuk Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 We're sponsored by the country/government - it's said HM has friends in the government Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRightSide Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Doesn't the fact Donny got booted out by the FL and we didn't tell you something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standidno Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 In all seriousness, do you not think mandaric would have done these type of checks, seriously? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentpete Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/en/eu/?rpqSearch=NO&pageNav=No&searchField=Entity&searchText=Baghlan+group&find.x=8&find.y=10 S&P don't seem to offer a rating for Baghlan Group at all. I'm probably not searching correctly lack of a rating in the case of baghlan group is more to do with a lack of information from the company and azeri banks than any negative finances an azeri oil and gas company which also has an effective monopoly on the countries [or at least the capitals] transport systems with such close ties to government isn't going anywhere or running out of money any time soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul.. Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 lack of a rating in the case of baghlan group is more to do with a lack of information from the company and azeri banks than any negative finances Yes that was made clear in the articles I read, technically they supposedly defaulted on some loans however the primary issue with recommending (or not) trading in their shares is down to the lack of available information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nookiebear Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 He never as been yet Right about wot ? I've always been right, you've always been wrong. Go figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TbagMcgraw Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 mama.png(to the tune of Popeye the sailor man)Hafiz the pizza man, he comes from Azerbaijan. Thin base or stuffed crust, he collects football clubs. Hafiz the pizza man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now