Jump to content

Gutted


Recommended Posts

Didn't deserve to lose that.

More than matched derby and had all the chances. You could argue we weren't clinical enough but had 2 cleared off the line

As good as the Chelsea lad looked I thought that actually pushed us back a bit and was the wrong change. Pushing Antonio up front doesn't work.

And the ref made my blood boil. EVERY challenge was deemed a foul by us. Disgraceful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest JonTheOwl66

The difference tonight was a team who have a striker who knows where the back of the net is....

And I team that doesn't...

On the whole we didn't deserve to lose at all

Imagine if we had signed Matty Fryatt for 500k eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest wilyfox

shows just how strong Derby are. We might deserve something from the game, but they have so many match-winners who seem to take it in turns to pop up and deliver the goods. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

love it...when exactly was Matt Fryatt up for sale at that price?

can you show the fax/email you received from Hull when you asked?

Hull would have taken 500k for fryatt he is out of contract at the end of the season so they will lose him for nothing...

Makes business sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest wilyfox

Bruce said quite clearly Fryatt wasn't going anywhere towards the end of the window. But i'm sure we'll be in the queue for him in the summer on a free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hull would have taken 500k for fryatt he is out of contract at the end of the season so they will lose him for nothing...

Makes business sense

 

now answer the question without speculating show me proof.

 

how many of our players were OOC last season how many did we sell again?

 

how many are OOC this season how many have we sold?

 

why's Kirkland still here?

 

some one should have offered us 500k in January using your logic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't know much about business do you ?

Explain why it doesn't make sense then...so they've got a striker who is going to be on a decent contract until the end of the season not playing..

When they could have offloaded him for a fee and got him off the wage bill

Don't know much about business do you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...