Jump to content

Helan to re-sign.


Recommended Posts

Beholder... An apology will be accepted...

"Sorry I got it wrong"

lol

I said: "It's clear he wouldn't have signed him (Pugh) if he had signed Helan last week"

 

And you want me to apologise to you and say I got it wrong?

 

er no, I stand by my statement. I don't believe he would have signed Pugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said: "It's clear he wouldn't have signed him (Pugh) if he had signed Helan last week"

And you want me to apologise to you and say I got it wrong?

er no, I stand by my statement. I don't believe he would have signed Pugh.

Yet you called me pedantic and tedious... When I never said it wasn't that. Just purely that he was covering his bases I case Helan didn't comeback.

Anyways... This was your first post...

ooh!!!

Great news if true.

Makes Pugh a bit redundant though.

I disagreed with this because it doesn't make Pugh redundant. I never once said and neither did anyone else say that he would have signed Pugh even if Helan was signed, but the again none of us really know whether he would have or not.

You're posts are the ones going off at a tangent about cover in the squad, how it wouldn't make sense to sign Helan and Pugh (errrrr.....???) and how DJ said he had moved on.

I was disagreeing with the last bit... saying if Helan was available for us we would sign him.

Erm... Case proved by the fact we've signed him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I predict that Helan will play left midfield.

Pugh will be a benchwarmer. He might get one or two appearanes as sub.

If that happened my original comment about Pugh being redundant will be proven right.

Fair enough (not that you will be right).

You blatantly ignore your post about we don't need cover, how signing 2 players for 1 position doesnt make sense and how we'd moved on in reply to my post saying that the possibility of DJ being kept in touch about the possibility of us signing him if available even with Pugh here.

Tonights proved that DJ was kept in touch. The deal wasn't dead.

You called it wrong in the thread Beholder.

No shame, we all get it wrong from time to time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really not arsed about being wrong.

 

 

Otherwise I wouldn't stick my neck out about Pugh not getting picked.

 

 

However, you seem a little obsessed in trying to prove me wrong. I am not entirely sure what your point is other than that.

Edited by Beholder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really not arsed about being wrong.

Otherwise I wouldn't stick my neck out about Pugh not getting picked.

However, you seem a little obsessed in trying to prove me wrong. I am not entirely sure what your point is other than that.

Not really.

I'm just being tedious & pedantic.

:Reda:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...