fatzooma Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 He must be good, he's keeping Julian Bennet out of the side Who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JonTheOwl66 Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Fastest player in the squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest foreverSWFC Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 JJ is faster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JonTheOwl66 Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Nope. Danny Jones is the fastest in the entire squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 No goals against us come as a result of crosses or passes from Jones area of the pitch Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edinburghowl Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Clearly, injuries and bans for Reda and Mattock brought him into the team - he's doing his best to keep his place. Good for him! You can't say fairer than that. He has done well in the last few games and deserves his place in the side at the moment. Let's hope he can keep it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest foreverSWFC Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 No goals against us come as a result of crosses or passes from Jones area of the pitch Except the four free kicks we gave away in the same position down that right on the edge of the box. If Ipswich weren't so poo poo we would have been punished for them. Jones gave away three of the four. I'd much prefer Reda at left back, more confident with him at the back, Jones is shaky in possession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Big Guns Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 No goals against us come as a result of crosses or passes from Jones area of the pitch That's cos we won 3-0 ,no goals game against us from any areas of the pitch... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pulsar Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 reda needs to be looking at c/b for a couple of years down the line... Sharp intake of breath! Not sure about that one mate? I prefer Reda at LB tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 No goals against us come as a result of crosses or passes from Jones area of the pitch THIS Goals against us never come as a result of any mistakes by Daniel Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Monkey Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Except the four free kicks we gave away in the same position down that right on the edge of the box. If Ipswich weren't so poo poo we would have been punished for them. Jones gave away three of the four. I'd much prefer Reda at left back, more confident with him at the back, Jones is shaky in possession. I don't understand the 'Reda is a better right back' comments. He can be a liability at times. His positioning skills let him and us down. That said, his attacking threat is good and he chips in with goals. However, there's no point in a player scoring if he is going to contribute to us conceding goals too. I don't understand the 'Reda is a better right back' comments. He can be a liability at times. His positioning skills let him and us down. That said, his attacking threat is good and he chips in with goals. However, there's no point in a player scoring if he is going to contribute to us conceding goals too. Oops, sorry, I meant left back....blush Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DobbinTheDonkey Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 How do you know we would have been punished? Quite simply you don't but never stop that you from doing what you do best , outlandish statements based on nothiing but your own thoughts, The first half freekicks didn't trouble the defence as the lot were over hit, how do you do they wouldn't have coped with it. After the defence comes Kirkland, how do you know ge wouldn't have saved it. Also Jones wasn't the cause for all the freekicks, poor officiating caused atleast three, the dive past Gardner, the handball from about 2 yards and the winger smashing the ball away with no way of retrieving the ball so promptly ran straight into Jones but was on the way down before hitting him. Jones did ok and as the game went on his confidence grew and he got better. His clearances need working on and distribution but these should improve as his confidence grows. He also put in a pearly of a cross. The yellow card he took showed me he does have some knowledge of playing left back. He has the spot now, he has pace, he can tackle. He needs to work on his strength and timing aswell as his belief in himself, He might end up being our first choice leftback but it is entriely down to him. If he puts the wok in and doesn't become fisrt choice then atleast he can hold his head high. If he doesn't then we don't want players like that anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorian gray Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 I'd love to say the criticism is unfair, but it takes some defending........up until now. We have a need at left back. If Jones can fill it and not be a weak link I won't complain, I don't advocate offering him a new deal yet, but he HAS improved last few games. let's hope he's improving and not just playing for a new contract... if he has pace, and he has without doubt... and a brain in his head, and willing to learn... HE CAN MAKE A F/B, AND A BLOODY GOOD ONE TOO... we've not had much to call anything at l/f/b for some time, and he's playing at a higher level... KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK DAN JONES... AND THAT GOES FOR THE COACHING STAFF TOO... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redfern Froggatt Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Mattocks not played since he had a dust up with Jj That's why Jones is playing well that and the fact that Mattock is even more poo pooe than Jones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TonyOwl88 Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 His life here was always made difficult by boo boys, but he has potential. Just as well he got his chance this season because he's been doing us a job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl in Nottingham Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Looks a good player to me. I can't understand why we are so negative to our own players. Some people on here are so negative to our players they may be better supporting a different club Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest foreverSWFC Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 How do you know we would have been punished? Quite simply you don't but never stop that you from doing what you do best , outlandish statements based on nothiing but your own thoughts, The first half freekicks didn't trouble the defence as the lot were over hit, how do you do they wouldn't have coped with it. After the defence comes Kirkland, how do you know ge wouldn't have saved it. Also Jones wasn't the cause for all the freekicks, poor officiating caused atleast three, the dive past Gardner, the handball from about 2 yards and the winger smashing the ball away with no way of retrieving the ball so promptly ran straight into Jones but was on the way down before hitting him. Jones did ok and as the game went on his confidence grew and he got better. His clearances need working on and distribution but these should improve as his confidence grows. He also put in a pearly of a cross. The yellow card he took showed me he does have some knowledge of playing left back. He has the spot now, he has pace, he can tackle. He needs to work on his strength and timing aswell as his belief in himself, He might end up being our first choice leftback but it is entriely down to him. If he puts the wok in and doesn't become fisrt choice then atleast he can hold his head high. If he doesn't then we don't want players like that anyway. We would have been punished though, against stronger opposition at least 1 of those 4 free kicks would have resulted in a goal. If Michael Tonge had been standing over the ball, it would have troubled the keeper or troubled the defender, fortunately for us Ipswich were incredibly wasteful on four separate occasions in extremely inviting areas of the pitch. Have you not learnt anything from the losing run we were on? Mistakes will lead to goals and punishment in this league, you can't afford to give away stupid free kicks away in dangerous positions. We did and like I've said Ipswich wasted them and failed to make it count, we were fairly lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Bach Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 His problem is that he is more like a wing back which doesn't fit into the English game. I like him but then I rated Reynolds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Leeswfc3 Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Daniel Jones is underrated for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DobbinTheDonkey Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 We would have been punished though, against stronger opposition at least 1 of those 4 free kicks would have resulted in a goal. If Michael Tonge had been standing over the ball, it would have troubled the keeper or troubled the defender, fortunately for us Ipswich were incredibly wasteful on four separate occasions in extremely inviting areas of the pitch. Have you not learnt anything from the losing run we were on? Mistakes will lead to goals and punishment in this league, you can't afford to give away stupid free kicks away in dangerous positions. We did and like I've said Ipswich wasted them and failed to make it count, we were fairly lucky. Are you sure it is 1 in 4 though and not 1 in 3 or maybe 1 in 5, **** me what if it is 1 in 2? Panic!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now