Furious George Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Apparently. From what I've heard anyway. Not a lot of details at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latemodelchild Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Fot the wuck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattitheowl Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Michael yeah? Bit behind aren't we FG. Oh wait you mean Clinto.......... Fot the Wuck! Just not bothered... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Big Guns Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 wouldnt surprise me its obvious megson wants shut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B.A Baracus Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Wouldn't surprise me. Him and Megson hate each other. He's a bell end anyway and he's shybo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ak15 Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Good riddance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BoomTownOwls Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Wouldn't surprise me. Megson doesn't rate him and would allow him to bring somebody a bit different in. I know people have been praising Clinton but for me him and Madine together are not ideal. Neither runs the channels and neither can spin in behind. Added to that neither Lowe or O'Grady are rapid. A striker with pace would seem to give us a much better balance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0114 Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 If true this will just add to Megsons unpopularity at the moment. Getting rid of a player who has unquestionably been good this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DamnedOwl Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Can't say I'm too bothered if it's true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaminyPie Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 on loan or cut up his contract? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRADDAZ Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Won't be bothered if he does go. Yeah his work rate has improved this season, so he obviously looks a million times better than last season but his overall play is still pretty poo and in all honesty i've looked more threatening sat in the stands. Just won't score enough. Plus he'll be on a very decent wage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deano Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Timing is a bit off if true, with having only 2 fit strikers left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Big Guns Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Just cement boots and Reynolds and that's just about all Irvines crap gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BoomTownOwls Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 If true this will just add to Megsons unpopularity at the moment. Getting rid of a player who has unquestionably been good this season. He's hardly set the division alight has he? Anybody can see that the balance with Madine and Morrison is not right. Especially when we are away and the home team pushes onto the halfway line. We have no pace to get in behind. It is less of an issue when we are pressing more often at home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eaton_Swfc Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 He's been *better* this season . But *better* from totally flipping useless still isnt great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenhgate Owl Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 There is a god Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OxonOwl Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Don't think it is obvious. McGoldrick is surely cover for injuries. You can't afford to have just two fit strikers which would make it strange timing. If GM wants shot of him surely he'd wait until he had more than two to choose from. On the other hand if Clint thinks he sees the writing on the wall and a bit of good business can be done now, maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DamnedOwl Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 I suspect he is one of the higher earners at Wednesday, and let's face it, his performances (even this season) hardly represent value for money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike84 Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 It seems a strange decision if true with the fitness of our current forwards. I assume that either Lowe of COG will be back in the first team soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deano Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 There is only so long you can give a goal poacher, who doesnt score goals. If it is true i wish him luck, put in the effort, but his best days are behind him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now