Jump to content
Join Owlstalk and log in to join the SWFC discussion! ×

Be careful what you wish for

Guest billsaja

By Guest billsaja
in Sheffield Wednesday Matchday

 Share

Recommended Posts

DeeJayOne Grand Master

DeeJayOne

Posted
Posted

To surmise:

We have a thread conveniently titled enough to make Joe respond, by Billsaja who's intentions and integrity have been called into question in the past.

Joe responds and all of a sudden loads of 'spontaneously' researched piffle gets brought up dissing Joe, by aforementioned Billsaja.

Mysteriously (or conveniently), Geoff Sheard also turns up for he first time in ages and is seemingly best friends with Billsaja, despite them - apparently (and perhaps conveniently, again) - being mortal enemies just 12 months or so ago.

All this happens, as usual, after a poor result/performance and when the fans are at their most negative and susceptible to the FUD being spouted.

There are a few fishing rods out and plenty of biters here.

Thing is - people ought to look at history and integrity and ask if the people who are spouting off certain things have done or said anything in the past to warrant them being believed before taking any of it seriously.

As a soap-opera, it's fun to read - as a piece of legitimate prose on which to base any opinions on whatsoever, it's a load of bull and I hope people read it that way.

 SHEFFIELD SHOP

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Far Canal

Guest Far Canal

Posted
Posted

To surmise:

We have a thread conveniently titled enough to make Joe respond, by Billsaja who's intentions and integrity have been called into question in the past.

Joe responds and all of a sudden loads of 'spontaneously' researched piffle gets brought up dissing Joe, by aforementioned Billsaja.

Mysteriously (or conveniently), Geoff Sheard also turns up for he first time in ages and is seemingly best friends with Billsaja, despite them - apparently (and perhaps conveniently, again) - being mortal enemies just 12 months or so ago.

All this happens, as usual, after a poor result/performance and when the fans are at their most negative and susceptible to the FUD being spouted.

There are a few fishing rods out and plenty of biters here.

Thing is - people ought to look at history and integrity and ask if the people who are spouting off certain things have done or said anything in the past to warrant them being believed before taking any of it seriously.

As a soap-opera, it's fun to read - as a piece of legitimate prose on which to base any opinions on whatsoever, it's a load of bull and I hope people read it that way.

hi James

Not like you to spill the beans mate

Link to comment
Share on other sites
@owlstalk Grand Master

@owlstalk

Posted
Posted

To surmise:

As a soap-opera, it's fun to read - as a piece of legitimate prose on which to base any opinions on whatsoever, it's a load of bull and I hope people read it that way.

What does prose mean ?

I always thought they were them girls down neepsend with cold sores who nosh you off for a tenner ?

 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Batman Grand Master

The Batman

Posted
Posted

Tiny place.

I think Joe's a guy thats worked in finance for others but has now started up on his own and was involved in our deal due to his experience and obvious (see his blogs) knowledge of English football. thats just my theory I might be wrong but he hasn't done a lot wrong except let himself get wound up by Billy big b0ll0x. Who said in this thread C9S are GS with a website then C9S are real and might just pull this deal off then questions them again later in the thread, but we're all impressed by his big words and 'facts' so we believe him as we don't want to look foolish questioning him

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Weshallovercome Grand Master

Weshallovercome

Posted
Posted

To surmise:

We have a thread conveniently titled enough to make Joe respond, by Billsaja who's intentions and integrity have been called into question in the past.

Joe responds and all of a sudden loads of 'spontaneously' researched piffle gets brought up dissing Joe, by aforementioned Billsaja.

Mysteriously (or conveniently), Geoff Sheard also turns up for he first time in ages and is seemingly best friends with Billsaja, despite them - apparently (and perhaps conveniently, again) - being mortal enemies just 12 months or so ago.

All this happens, as usual, after a poor result/performance and when the fans are at their most negative and susceptible to the FUD being spouted.

There are a few fishing rods out and plenty of biters here.

Thing is - people ought to look at history and integrity and ask if the people who are spouting off certain things have done or said anything in the past to warrant them being believed before taking any of it seriously.

As a soap-opera, it's fun to read - as a piece of legitimate prose on which to base any opinions on whatsoever, it's a load of bull and I hope people read it that way.

You're getting good at this diplomacy malarkey..........is must be difficult, are you biting your lip as you type? :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
latemodelchild Grand Master

latemodelchild

Posted
Posted

To surmise:

We have a thread conveniently titled enough to make Joe respond, by Billsaja who's intentions and integrity have been called into question in the past.

Joe responds and all of a sudden loads of 'spontaneously' researched piffle gets brought up dissing Joe, by aforementioned Billsaja.

Mysteriously (or conveniently), Geoff Sheard also turns up for he first time in ages and is seemingly best friends with Billsaja, despite them - apparently (and perhaps conveniently, again) - being mortal enemies just 12 months or so ago.

All this happens, as usual, after a poor result/performance and when the fans are at their most negative and susceptible to the FUD being spouted.

There are a few fishing rods out and plenty of biters here.

Thing is - people ought to look at history and integrity and ask if the people who are spouting off certain things have done or said anything in the past to warrant them being believed before taking any of it seriously.

As a soap-opera, it's fun to read - as a piece of legitimate prose on which to base any opinions on whatsoever, it's a load of bull and I hope people read it that way.

Pigs will enjoy it though so its not all bad. That bomber command tailface will get some serious mileage out of this. Wonder if Lee has got neckache from all the head shaking he must be doing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
M Royds Grand Master

M Royds

Posted
Posted

Mysteriously (or conveniently), Geoff Sheard also turns up for he first time in ages and is seemingly best friends with Billsaja, despite them - apparently (and perhaps conveniently, again) - being mortal enemies just 12 months or so ago.

I don't get that impression. How do you?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...